Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intelligence and psychological testing
Essay on the importance of intelligence testing in education pdf
The importance of intelligence tests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Intelligence and psychological testing
The Unconscious Bias of Intelligence Tests
In the chapter entitled “The Hereditarian Theory of IQ:
An American Invention” in The Mismeasure of Man (New
York: Norton, 1996), Stephen Jay Gould analyzes the reasoning
behind intelligence tests. Gould begins the chapter by
stating how Alfred Binet, who studied the measurement of
intelligence, began this endeavor in order to institute special
education for learning-disabled and other disadvantaged children.
Gould continues his analysis by reporting that three of
Binet’s followers, H. H. Goddard (who brought Binet’s scale
to America), Lewis M. Terman (who developed the Stanford-
Binet scale), and Robert M. Yerkes (who persuaded the army
to test the intelligence of 1.75 million men in World War I),
corrupted Binet’s work and used his tests to measure an element
they called “intelligence,” which ultimately resulted in
peoplebeing labeled as either “intelligent” or “stupid.” In this
chapter, Gould successfully demonstrates that the work of
these three men was affected by their unconscious biases and
preconceived ideas.
According to Gould, Alfred Binet developed his scale for
a sensible, effective motive. The original purpose of Binet’s
scale was to identify children whose poor performances in
school suggested a need for special education. Unlike previous
tests, Binet’s scale utilized a variety of distinct activities, such as
counting coins and comprehension, which tested a child’s different
abilitites: “Binet decided to assign an age level to each
task, defined as the youngest age at which a child of normal
intelligence should be able to complete the task successfully”
(179). The age parallel with the last task the child could successfully
complete was that particular child’s “mental age.” A
child’s level of intelligence was determined by
subtracting his/her mental age from his/her true chronological
age. Those children whose mental ages were a great deal
behind their chronological ages were recommended for special
education programs. In 1912, W. Stern suggested instead of
subtracting the mental age of a child from his/her chronological
age, the mental age should be divided by his/her chronological
age, and thus the intelligence quotient (IQ) came into
existence. Binet never once labeled IQ as inborn intelligence;
he simply used his scale to identify those children who were
learning-disabled, in an effort to direct them to places where
they would receive special help.
H.H. Goddard was the first person to make Binet’s scale
popular in America. However, Goddard distorted Binet’s scale
and relied on it to identify the allegedly intellectually defective
people in the country; he even relied on his preconceived notions
to label these individuals “feeble-minded” and “morons”
from the Greek word meaning foolish. All people whose actions
went against moral behavior were designated “morons.”
These people included criminals, alcoholics, and prostitutes.
According to Gould, Goddard believed “morons” should be
Authors in the 1900s created short stories by writing short books that they could sell for quick cash. This is how the genre of short stories came about. As more and more stories were published, shorts became very popular because they were so short. Many people loved the idea that they could finish an entire story in one sitting. As the stories became more popular, Kurt Vonnegut, a short story writer, developed a list of 8 rules that make a perfect short story. He executes his rules in his short stories giving many examples of what the standard for short story writing should be.
The final Faux-TAT picture was showed a few people on an extraterrestrial planet. The instructions again remained the same and for this picture Steven response was, “This story is about the first people that landed on the planet Saturn. It was five people that landed on the planet and they were happy. But three of them discovered gold and they did not want to share with the others. So they thought that it would be a good idea to kill the other two and keep the gold. They thought they killed the other two but it turns out that they were wearing bulletproof vest and stayed alive. And here it shows right before they attack the three and stole the gold from them. And then the returned to earth, kept the gold, and never told the truth about the
Lewis Terman created the IQ tests that many schools used to test student’s intellect capacity. This test caused many students to only be taught how to work in factories rather than learning material that could get them into better careers.
Ever since the end of racial segregation, Americans have struggled with equality and have been caught between racial tensions and incidences that portray racial prejudice in the existing society. Sociologists and physiologist Anthony Greenwald with two of his other colleagues designed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) that evaluates the autonomic associations individuals have based on their reactions towards certain topics such as race. I recently took the test and the results were absolutely not surprising to me. According to the results of the IAT the following percentages depict the percentage of test takers’ autonomic preferences to either black or white: 48% have a strong autonomic preference to whites, 13 % moderate to white, 12 % slight preference to whites, 12% little or no preference to whites, 6 % slight preference to black, 4 % moderate preference to black and 6 % Strong automatic preference for Black people. The test portrayed me as having no automatic preference between white or black; which is true based on my experiences. As I grew up in Nairobi, Kenya, my association towards whites was that of wealth because the only white people who would come to Kenya
Writing a story is pretty difficult. Writing a short story is even harder, there is so much that has to be accomplished; in both commercial and literary fiction! The plot, the structure, whether it has a happy, unhappy, or indeterminate ending. There must be artistic unity, chance, coincidence, rising action, climax, falling action. Most importantly there must be characterization. Characters make the story! “anyone can summarize what a person in a story has done, but a writer needs considerable skill and insight into human beings to describe convincingly who a person is” [page 168]
A good way to do this is to develop cooperative tasks between students with disabilities and other students. Develop activities that the student with disabilities can be successful in which will result in everyone involved have a much more positive attitude.
The method primarily used throughout research was the Implicit Association Test (IAT). This test is a measure used in the study of social psychology that is used to predict a person’s first association between different mental representations in one’s memory. In these particular studies the IAT is used to detect one’s behaviors, judgements, and decisions suggestive of ethnic and racial discrimination (Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Jaccard, & Tetlock, 2007). This test is usually done through technology. In the race IAT, participants would sit in front of the computer and be shown a variety of black faces and white faces. They were also told that one button on the keyboard is associated with the word “old” (negative),
After a close analysis of “America” by Tony Hoagland, the poem warns and points out the problems with our consumerism. Hoagland uses metaphors and imagery to describe the actions of American, while throwing in counteracting themes. And uses thoughts and dreams to bring in metaphors that complex the poem.
How standardized are standardized tests? In America, we strive to perfect them as well as give our students an education they deserve but at what cost? Standardized tests have been the easiest way to ultimately evaluate a student against every other student in America. However, standardized tests are not as great as they are made out to be. We need to take a step back and look at the faults of standardized tests. Quite simply: Standardized tests are not standardized.
Growing up in a very accepting and forward home, I always found myself to be free of most bias. Having been the target of some racial prejudice in the past, I always told myself that I would make sure nobody else had to feel the same way. While this may be a great way to think, it really only covers the fact that you will not have any explicit bias. What I have realized during the course of this class is that implicit bias often has a much stronger effect on us than we might think, and even the most conscious people can be affected.
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
Human intelligence is an eel-like subject: slippery, difficult to grasp, and almost impossible to get straight [3]. Many scientist and psychologist have made numerous attempts to come up with an explanation for the development of human intelligence. For many years, there has been much controversy over what intelligence is and whether it is hereditary or nurtured by the environment. Webster's dictionary defines intelligence as "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge; which includes a sensing an environment and reaching conclusions about the state of that environment [7]. In this paper I am going to examine the factors, which make up ones intelligence. I will be investigating whether or not intelligence is fostered by genetic heritance or nurtured by ones environment.
As minors commit violent crimes without being held accountable, they can grow up to be real criminals and they can be very dangerous. Without a solid foundation of what is right and wrong, these minors will grow up believing that their actions are the norm. For this reason, minors need to be held accountable. They need to be taught that they cannot get away with their crimes. In 2007, courts with juvenile jurisdiction handled an estimated 1.7 million delinquency cases. Delinquency cases include vandalism, shoplifting, robbery, and murder. These are just some of the crimes minors can commit. This was up by forty-four percent from 1985. If a minor grows up believing that crime is acceptable, they will repeat the pattern. Without interrupting the pattern and making them accountable, these minors will always have a twisted sense of right and wrong. A sense of what is right and wrong is important and can be learned at any age. Minors learn very young, what...
There is a great deal of controversy over the trying and sentencing of juvenile offenders today. Many will argue that because the severity of Juvenile crimes has risen, the severity of its consequences should rise; however, no matter how serious the crime is, juvenile offenders tried as adults receive far worse than they deserve. The majority of Juveniles tried as adults are hardly given any form of human rights. Adult jails are not the environment children should have to experience, especially those sentenced for misdemeanors and nonviolent crimes. There are other solutions to reducing juvenile crime. It does not take adult court to straighten out kids on the wrong path. Most children are not even able to recognize that what they had done is wrong. There may be no perfect solution to reducing juvenile crime, but there are ways far more effective than adult trying and sentencing.
On the ‘nature’ side of the debate is the psychometric approach, considered to be the most dominant in the study of intelligence, which “inspired the most research and attracted the most attention” (Neisser et al. 1996, p. 77). It argues that there is one general (‘g’) factor which accounts for intelligence. In the 1880s, Francis Galton conducted many tests (measuring reaction times to cognitive tasks), (Boundless 2013), in order to scientifically measure intelligence. These tests were linked to the eugenic breeding programme, which aimed to eliminate biologically inferior people from society. Galton believed that as intelligence was inherited, social class or position were significant indicators of intelligence. If an individual was of high social standing, they would be more intelligent than those of a lower position. However he failed to show any consistency across the tests for this hypothesis, weakening his theory that social class correlated with intelligence. Nevertheless, his creation of the intelligence test led many to continue to develop...