Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Into the wild character analysis
The stronger character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Into the wild character analysis
Adrian Golebiewski
Writing a story is pretty difficult. Writing a short story is even harder, there is so much that has to be accomplished; in both commercial and literary fiction! The plot, the structure, whether it has a happy, unhappy, or indeterminate ending. There must be artistic unity, chance, coincidence, rising action, climax, falling action. Most importantly there must be characterization. Characters make the story! “anyone can summarize what a person in a story has done, but a writer needs considerable skill and insight into human beings to describe convincingly who a person is” [page 168]
Authors present their characters either directly or indirectly. In all good fiction all characters are dramatized. There are flat characters, they can be summarized pretty quickly. There are special types of flat characters one of which is called a stock character; characters we recognize right away (a sheriff or detective) On the other hand are round characters, which have qualities of real people and are many-sided. The static character is the same person from beginning to end, and finally there is the developing character which undergoes some kind of change, this character usually undergoes an epiphany. “Ultimately it is the quality of the characterization by which a literary story stands or falls”. [page 173]
There is three things necessary to make a convincing or developing character; “first It must be consistent with the individual’s characterization as dramatized in the story, second It must be sufficiently motivated by the circumstances in which the character is placed, and finally the story must offer sufficient time for the change to take place to be believable.” [page 172]
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Con...
... middle of paper ...
... flask and and went home and thought to himself two things; how difficult it would be to replace Ivan, and how Rainsford escaped him. This is where the final step needed for a convincing character comes into play. It took from beginning to end but the change was there. The General congratulated Rainsford for winning the game after he surprised him by standing in his room.
“Rainsford did not smile, I am still a beast at bay,” he said, in a low hoarse voice. “Get ready, General Zaroff.” The General made one of his deepest bows. “I see, splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On Guard. Rainsford…” [page 76]
“He has never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided.” [page 76] The final step was completed in the last line of the story. Richard Connell did an excellent job making a convincing character.
Rainsford is an intelligent man. Early in the story, “Rainsford remembered the shots. They had come from the right, and he doggedly swam in that direction” (34). Rainsford had just fallen in the water, swam fifty feet further out, but he kept his senses in the right direction. In total darkness, Rainsford used his intelligence and intellect to reach the land. Also, I don’t think that Rainsford knew he was being sized up when Zaroff was staring at him, but when “Rainsford’s bewilderment showed in his face” (100), he quickly understood what Zaroff was leading too. Rainsford wasn’t a murderer. Sure he liked to hunt game, but he wasn’t bored as Zaroff was. Rainsford never bought into all the old tales. ‘“One superstitious sailor can taint the whole ship’s company with fear”’ (20). He never got worked up or stressed out.
“Rainsford’s second thought was even more terrible. It sent a shudder of cold horror through his whole being. Why had the general smiled? Why had he turned back?” This quote is important for us to know because it creates suspense overall in the story and helps to keep it interesting. It also helps to show more of the dynamic change that Rainsford is going through. “Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” At the beginning of the story, Rainsford was overconfident and was not fearful of much.
How do fiction storytellers reveal a character’s actions and or characteristics? Fiction storytellers use things like conflicts, diction, and imagery to add a better description to a book. Most of these examples also hook the reader to want to learn more. The mood of a story is also revealed when using this examples. In The Looking Glass Wars Beddor uses conflicts and challenges to inform the reader about Alyss’ characteristics.
In this story there was two main characters Rainsford and General Zaroff. General Zaroff was a very untrustworthy authority figure from Russia who escaped the Russian Revolution. “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my house.” In the beginning he was very welcoming to Rainsford and shared dinner and clothes with him. Rainsford started to believe he was safe and was going to be able to head home soon. Then they
Rainsford headed off and had spent two hours making his way across a bush all the while repeating the phrase, “I must keep my nerve” (Connell 11). Rainsford tried to keep calm in a terrifying situation because he wanted to live. He was being motivated by the idea of living so he kept persevering. Rainsford had jumped into the sea to get away from the General and it had worked because later that night Rainsford snuck into the General's room and challenged him. Rainsford ultimately won the game and won the privilege of sleeping Zaroff's excellent bed, because we can infer that Rainsford killed him (Connell 15). Rainsford took a chance and jumped into the sea because he knew he wasn’t going to give up without a fight. When Rainsford showed up in his room he knew the general would not let him leave so he challenged him in order for him to stay alive, again taking a chance in order to live. Throughout the story Rainsford had changed, leading up to this moment when he won the game, stayed alive, and killed the general. In the beginning Rainsford was motivated by the great sport of hunting, but then near the end Rainford's only motivation was to stay
We can see that Rainsford was intrigued with the general until the point when he realized that the general was hunting humans.”But no animal can reason” here Rainsford still does know but then when he says this “but you can 't mean” he then starts to piece it together and begins to realize that he was wrong. He was killing animals recklessly but when it came to humans he stopped immediately.
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, there are two main characters, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff. The story starts off with Rainsford and Rainsford’s hunting partner, Whitney, on a yacht heading to Rio de Janiero to hunt big game animals. Rainsford ends up becoming trapped on Ship-Trap Island, and that is where he and the reader are introduced to General Zaroff. Unfortunately for Rainsford, General Zaroff is not your normal General. General Zaroff and Rainsford are similar and different in many ways, and even though Rainsford believes that Zaroff is a sick individual, at the end of the story he becomes more like Zaroff than he realizes.
Rainsford had the unfortunate opportunity to choose to be hunted or forced unto the disposal of Ivan, a man d...
Rainsford overcomes many obstacles, and in return he receives that special feeling of satisfaction in his body. To start, he overcomes the thought of him being weak. Furthermore, he conquers learning the value of even an animal’s life. Not to mention, he defeats becoming the hunted, when he is the hunter. In the short story Sanger Rainsford outwits General Zaroff in the battle of “The Most Dangerous
In order to obtain humans to hunt, he got lights to “indicate a channel where there is none; giant rocks with razor edges…” (pg. 9) He knew how to lure in ships and collect survivors of the crashed ships, which he would later hunt. Zaroff also owned a pack of dogs to locate anyone that was able to escape the Generals grasp, but only “One almost did win. (Zaroff) had to use the dogs.” (pg.9) As Zaroff was hunting Rainsford “he made his way along with his eyes fixed in utmost concentration on the ground before him.” (pg.12) to look for signs to figure out Rainsford's whereabouts. As the general is hunting Rainsford he almost fell into a trap but “Even as he touched it, the general sensed danger and leaped back with the agility of an ape.” (pg.13) The general was very keen on killing Rainsford on the third day the General starts to become even more developed in his own
Throughout the story Richard Connell has the readers at the edges of their seats by making the story suspenseful. At first Rainsford is being chased by General Zaroff and the reader doesn't know what might happen next. While Rainsford is being hunted, he keeps his cool until he realizes Zaroff is messing with him. In the story it says,"The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day’s sport! The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse.
“I suggest to one of them that we go hunting. I give him supply of food and an excellent hunting knife. I am to follow, armed only with a pistol of the smallest caliber and range” (11). Zaroff explains to Rainsford the game which seems unfair since Zaroff had a gun and the other person had a knife. Rainsford thought that something was wrong when Zaroff was explaining him the game, but Rainsford did not pay a lot of attention. “Rainsford did not believe what his reason told him was true, but the truth was as evident as the sun that had by now pushed through the mists. The general was playing him. The general was saving him for another day’s sport. The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse” (15). Rainsford realized that Zaroff was cheating and lying to him since the beginning. After all the things that happened, Rainsford knew that he should have listened to his instincts. Zaroff showed his real personality which is conceited, rude, crazy, and an hypocrite, even though at the end he ended up losing against
What elements are needed to create a good short story? As John Dufrense quoted "A good story has a visionary quality, a personal voice, a signature gesture(1969). The elements used should be used so strongly that it pulls you in; forcing you to connect to the people in the story. Not every story is written well enough to be capable of doing this. This also creates a connection with the reader; leaving some type of effect or impacting the reader along with the characters’ lives. Although there are many elements in writing but one of the greatest things of writing is the ability to make the reader empathize with the characters. This goes beyond than just a connection with the characters; when the reader is able to apprehend with the characters he or she is truly relating and reaching out to them. The author has accomplished something truly special when the reader has the ability to feel the agony that a character is feeling.
In the story this happened when Zaroff dogs found rainsford. Rainsford knew that Zaroff had a advantage with the dogs. The lights from the windows sent a flickering illumination that made grotesque patterns on the courtyard below, and Rainsford could see moving about there a dozen or so huge black shapes; as they turned toward him, their eyes glittered greenly.(9). Since Zaroff had a lot of advantages, it made rainsford work hard to survive. Rainsford had to make traps and he had to kill Ivan. At the end of the story Rainsford showed up in Zaroff's room. Rainsford slept in the bed and Zaroff slept with the hounds. Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. Rainsford didn't have anything to kill with. He had nothing to survive. Zaroff had weapons and dogs. Rainsford tried but believe he couldn't win while Zaroff didn't try and believed that he will win. As the result of Rainsford surviving he won the
Characterization in a novel is an incredibly important tool for the author, as it sets up what the character will be like for the rest of the novel. Thus, characterization can never