The Scientific Revolution
When comparing the views presented by both Aristotle and Copernicus, one must consider the circumstances under which these men lived to understand the differences. The most obvious of these is the time in history. Aristotle came almost 2000 years earlier in the astronomy field. While Copernicus had set out to glorify the great religion of his time, Aristotle's views came 200 years before Christ was even born! Although the book gives the impression nothing of significance in astronomy happened in the time between Aristotle and Copernicus, professional astronomy was a developing institution during that time. For nearly 2000 years astronomers had been tracking and organizing and refining the prevailing thoughts in astronomy so that Copernicus could look at them and make his judgment. This touches on perhaps the largest difference between Copernicus and Aristotle; while Aristotle was a pioneer in his field and was bringing a whole new theory about to explain the world to the people, Copernicus was merely evaluating and analyzing other people's theories. In fact, some would say there is no such thing as the Copernican theory, but merely a theory Copernicus believed. The major point where Copernicus disagreed with Aristotelian theory—that the Sun was the center of the universe—was taken from the Greeks. Even after deviating from the Aristotelian view, Copernicus did not question any of the other elements, such as celestial spheres and divine circular motion. While Aristotle and his views revolutionized the thinking of mankind for nearly 2000 years, Copernicus was so timid he did not even publish his works until the year of his death. Finally, while the Aristotelian theory was embrace...
... middle of paper ...
...just as Kepler had sought to make sense of Brahe's vast amount of data, Newton sought to make sense of all the recently discovered science. While Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo and others had achieved a piece of the puzzle, they had done more to destroy the old "universal" theory of Aristotle than arrive at a new one. It was Isaac Newton who finally published in his Principia the "Universal Gravitation Theory" and other laws of motion which explained the motion of every item and object in the universe, from Kepler's elliptical orbits to Galileo's metal balls. By combining the observation and theories from those before him, he was able to use the scientific method to mathematically derive this "synthesis", which led some to call him the "Supreme genius of the scientific revolution.
Bibliography:
Theories on Western Civilization, Random House, 1988
First of all, what Copernicus was trying to say about Orbit and the Earth that
Thomas Kuhn, an American Philosopher of Science in the twentieth century, introduced the controversial idea of "paradigm shifts" in his 1962 book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." This essay will discuss paradigm shifts, scientific revolutions, mop up work, and other key topics that Kuhn writes about in "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in great detail. This essay will explain what Kuhn means by mop up work, by drawing on the broader view of paradigms that he presents and explaining how paradigms are born and develop such that they structure the activities of normal science in specific ways, and this essay will show how this kind of mop up work can, in certain circumstances, lead to a new paradigm instead of more normal science.
During the Scientific Revolution, the struggle between faith and reason was exhibited through Galileo and his discoveries. The Catholic Church during the time period of the Scientific Revolution did not approve of any outside scientists who came up with new theories and observations. The Church believed that all information about how the world worked was in the bible and that was the only right source. In an excerpt from “What is Scientific Authority?” written by Galileo in 1615, it states, “Showing a greater fondness for their [Catholic Church’s] own opinions than for truth, they sought to deny & disprove the new things which, if they had cared to look for themselves, their own senses would have demonstrated to them…” Galileo Galilei himself knew that the Church was not willing to approve of new ideas from other scientists, but only from the teachings in the Bible. Later on in the excerpt, Galileo writes, “They [Catholic Church] hurled various charges &…made the grave mistake of sprinkling these with passages taken from places in the Bible which they had failed to understand properl...
Over the next 50 years Copernicus’s book would slowly make its way across Europe. In 1566 a second edition was published without the false preface. The church denounced the book and Copernicus for “going against the bible”, but eventually began to accept it and allow it to be taught. Copernicus’s work was profound and changed the direction of Astronomy. It dared to challenge the notion that the Earth was the center of the universe, and that heavenly matter was unchanging and perfect. Over the next several hundred years Brahe would observe, Kepler and Newton would pour over the numbers and they would find the Copernicus’s model had underlying truths, some flaws, but with tweaking and vigilant observations of the celestial motions it would be the basis that lead them to the model we know today. Bringing forth what we know as the Copernican Revolution.
Sir Isaac Newton made an enormous amount of contributions to the world of physics. He invented the reflecting telescope, proposed new theories of light and color, discovered calculus, developed the three laws of motion, and devised the law of universal gravitation. His greatest contribution to physics was the development of the three laws of motion. The first law was called the law of inertia; this law stated that, “Every object persists in its state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed upon it.” The second law is called the law of acceleration; this law stated that, “Force is equal to the chan...
In 1543 Nicholas Copernicus, a Polish Canon, published “On the Revolution of the Celestial Orbs”. The popular view is that Copernicus discovered that the earth revolves around the sun. The notion is as old as the ancient Greeks however. This work was entrusted by Copernicus to Osiander, a staunch Protestant who though the book would most likely be condemned and, as a result, the book would be condemned. Osiander therefore wrote a preface to the book, in which heliocentrism was presented only as a theory which would account for the movements of the planets more simply than geocentrism did, one that was not meant to be a definitive description of the heavens--something Copernicus did not intend. The preface was unsigned, and everyone took it to be the author’s. That Copernicus believed the helioocentric theory to be a true description of reality went largely unnoticed. In addition to the preface, this was partly because he still made reassuring use of Ptolemy's cycles and epicycles; he also borrowed from Aristotle the notion that the planets must move in circles because that is the only perfect form of motion.
The Scientific revolution in the 16th and 17th centuries changed the way that people views the world. Scientific philosophers such as Galileo and Descartes threw out the old teachings of the church and challenged them with new ways of thinking. These men sought to prove that rational thought could prove the existence of God. They also challenged that it was an understanding of a series of rational thoughts, not faith, would bring understanding of how the world worked. Traditional ways of thinking were ultimately challenged by logical and sensible rationale.
Nicolaus Copernicus was a scientist and religious man born in 1473 in Poland who studied law and medicine in Italy while the Renaissance was in full swing. In 1543, the year of his death, his great work On the Revolution of the Heavenly Spheres, was published and this arguably marks the beginning of the Scientific Revolution. Since the second century AD, Claudius Ptolemy’s geo-centric solar system was widely accepted as the truth. Ptolemy’s description was based on observation of the paths drawn out by the planets as viewed from the Earth. From the position of the Earth, it appeared that the orbit of the Sun and moon were circular and that the paths of other planets seemed to loop back on to themselves. This model survived for a surprising 1400 years. Copernicus took a step back and asked an important question: What would the motions of the planets look like viewed from another position in space, like the Sun? He discovered that he could describe all the motions predicted by the Ptolemaic system with one answer; that all the planets except the moon moved round the Sun in circular orbits, including the Earth itself. This discovery was revolutionary for this time period, for this was not only an astronomical discovery. It had repercussions in that it contradicted the Christian doctrine, which said that the
Perhaps one of Newton’s most famous findings was the law of gravity. This momentous discovery explained why things fell to the earth as well as the force that keeps the solar system in its place and as it should be. Newton’s laws of gravity as well as his other prominent ideas were published in the form on a book in 1687. Newton states “ Nature follows uniform laws. All motion in the universe can be measured and described mathematically.” This statement makes a tremendous connection to all forms of sciences, especially physical science and astronomy. The works of Isaac Newton led to the development of calculus, a form of mathematics still applied today, to mathematically explain his theories and laws. The works of this influential scientist, Isaac Newton, are still used in the modern world and heavily impacted today’s education. If it were not for his incredible works, the world would be deprived of the knowledge of gravity and acceleration, as well as why things are as they are. Newton introduced his idea that reads “ To every action there is always opposed an opposite reaction”. (Newton’s Third Law of Motion) Isaac Newton had developed the Principa which was proclaimed “the greatest science book ever written.” The world would be completely different and perhaps unknowledgeable without the works of this great
The Scientific Revolution took place in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. It was not a "revolution" in the classic sense as it did not involve rapid political changes nor large numbers of people, but it was revolutionary in the sense that it completely changed people's way of thinking and their outlook on the world we live in. It was definitely one of the most important events in history as it marked the birth of modern science. With the Scientific Revolution, man became more curious about nature. He wanted to learn more about natural phenomena and the mechanisms of nature, and he also adopted a new method for the study of nature.
Thomas S. Kuhn’s, “The Nature of Necessity of Scientific Revolutions” want us to understand that the nature of the universe is evolving because people gain new knowledge in science. He addresses that as the universe is evolving human beings aquire new knowledge in science. In Kuhn’s work he mentions, “Simultaneously we have had to alter the fundamental structural elements of which the universe to which they apply is composed.” From this I understood that the universe is growing and human beings are expanding their knowledge and discovering new things, all thanks to the evolution of the universe.
Throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, radical and controversial ideas were created in what would become a time period of great advances. The Scientific Revolution began with a spark of inspiration that spread a wild fire of ideas through Europe and America. The new radical ideas affected everything that had been established and proven through religious views. "The scientific revolution was more radical and innovative than any of the political revolutions of the seventeenth century."1 All of the advances that were made during this revolutionary time can be attributed to the founders of the Scientific Revolution.
1687: Sir Isaac Newton published his book Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, often known by the simpler title Principa. Principia included details on his law of motion as well as Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation. Sir Newton took Galileo’s theory where objects are pulled toward the center of the Earth and expanded the concept, showing that the same gravitational force results in the orbit of planets in the solar system. “He used the Latin word gravitas (weight) for the force that would become known as gravity and defined the law of universal gravitation” (New World Encyclopedia,
Science may be described as the key to the prevailing mode of life in a so-called developed community. We revel on the idea that we are living in a modernized world which has been given a new look and shape due to science. Science has in fact transformed the world into one of wonders and blessings as well as one of deceit and curse!
The expansion and endorsement of intellectualism by the many important forward thinking scientists created a desire for social revolution, which, in turn, created an atmosphere conducive to further intellectual study. The Scientific Revolution was, in essence, both a social and intellectual revolution. During the Scientific Revolution, scientists such as Nicolaus Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Francis Bacon, Rene Descartes, and Christiaan Huygens wrestled with questions concerning God, human intellectualism, and their scientific views of the universe, its purpose, and how it functions. Ultimately, the implications of these new scientific discoveries began to change the way people thought and behaved. People began to question the widely accepted and Roman Catholic Church endorsed Aristotelian views of the universe. This led to the questioning of the traditional views of the state and societal structure. The geocentric Ptolemaic model was no longer blindly accepted. The earth was now no longer easily explainable or thought to be the center of the universe. Beliefs that were hundreds of years old were now proven to be false.