The Role Of Immigrants In The Film Race II

660 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: African Americans in civil war

Throughout the film “Race III,” there were a lot of objectives in order to classify people of being white and being eligible of becoming naturalized U.S. citizen. We saw how immigrants started get categorized as a certain racial group. Depending on not only where you traveled from, but highly depending on the color of your body features. Biology was destiny. Which side you found yourself in the racial divide was a matter of life or death. Even those of lighter skin tones were sometimes subjected to being classified as non whites. States started to makes rules and regulations to classify these immigrants. Depending on the state you could change your race. This is because some stated ruled that having a certain percentage of African American in you makes you fully black. Most states varied, making it all extremely unfair. Whiteness was key to citizenship. In 1790 congress passed an act that only free white immigrants could obtain citizenship. After the civil war naturalization was offered to African American descent. Even though citizenship was granted to blacks, they still were treated as if they did not have the legal status. All the whites were the ones who had the better jobs, who had clear access to votes, were on …show more content…

Then, comes the judge deciding if you were white or black. There were many flawing in order to categorize blacks. Depending on the state you were in, they would subject you to being black by the different percentage of blackness you had in your ancestry. This leads to being able to legally change your race by crossing state lines. This is a very ineffective way to classify people. This way of classifying people was seen especially inefficient when the Armenians were ruled as whites. This lead to many different racial groups who have similarities to Armenians to petition whether or not they were white. The flaws were shown throughout this

Show More
Related

  • Takao Ozawa And Bhagat Singh Thind

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since 1790, the United States started to granted limited naturalization to immigrants of free white persons through the Naturalization Act of 1790 and established racial qualification to national citizenships. Immigrants regardless of who they were need to prove that they were of white race. This lead to the moment when defining who was white was through either scientific method or common knowledge. Into the early 19th and late 20th century, there were numerous of terms to include whiteness and non-racial qualification for immigration to the United States. As immigrants try to show how they were white, there were court cases, Takao Ozawa v. United States, 260 U.S. 178 (1922) and United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 (1923), which

    Read More

  • Summary Of Tommie Shelby's We Who Are Dark

    1480 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history in the United States, what it means to be a black person has taken on different meanings. This is a result of forced the segregation that occurred during the post slavery era. Whites wanted to keep the Caucasian race “pure” and in order to do so, anyone that had one drop of black blood in them was considered black. This is very different from the way today’s society identifies black people. Presently, a black person is more likely to be identified by the color of their skin or their phenotype instead of their genotype.

    Read More

  • The Great White Way Summary

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    For Dickerson if you were considered as non white, your privileges would be diminished, therefore, she argues that race is an arbitrary system for establishing hierarchy and privilege (51). People may not see it clearly, but there is no other purpose of focusing in one’s race. She uses black people as an example of having unequal opportunities. As she mentions in the article, Social Security program at first excluded black people, for she argues that it was an intentional racist program. They were not able to have a Social Security number, and the reason could be that it would be easier to put them away from “whites”. And this is just one example of how people were discriminated back on the days. In the same way, Coates also recalls that the only purpose of separate people between races is to organize a society, so this one can be favorable for those who considered themselves as “whites”. “The process of naming “the people” has never been a matter of genealogy and physiognomy so much as one of hierarchy” (Coates 551). All of the deal about the color of someone’s skin, the language, body traits was only to impose power and privileges. Racism goes beyond someone’s color or culture, and it is not the idea of being literally “white”, but of being

    Read More

  • Booker T. Washington vs. W.E.B. Dubois

    1164 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... same thing for blacks, first-class citizenship, but their methods for obtaining it differed. Because of the interest in immediate goals contained in Washington’s economic approach, whites did not realize that he anticipated the complete acceptance and integration of Negroes into American life. He believed blacks, starting with so little, would have to begin at the bottom and work up gradually to achieve positions of power and responsibility before they could demand equal citizenship—even if it meant temporarily assuming a position of inferiority. DuBois understood Washington’s program, but believed that it was not the solution to the “race problem.” Blacks should study the liberal arts, and have the same rights as white citizens. Blacks, DuBois believed, should not have to sacrifice their constitutional rights in order to achieve a status that was already guaranteed.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Citizenism

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    The only group of people that have ever felt a sense of belonging in the modernized United States are Caucasian people. Why? It’s not that they owned the land, or rightfully claimed it. No, it’s because their ancestors have used influence and power to take what they greedily lusted for. To make their stolen country succeed, they forcibly enlisted several slaves, and used the people they invited, to keep their iron fist credible. If the people could not rely on the government to feel protected, entitled, and successful, then they would combine forces to seek other forms of management. Similar to the formation of the Americas, and the Civil War, when the South’s protection (the possession of slaves to promote their economic success) was threatened.

    Read More

  • Discrimination Against African Americans In The 1800s

    413 Words  | 1 Pages

    Back in the early 1800’s, America was having a hard time accepting others. The Americans did not like having immigrants living in the same area, and they really hated when immigrants took their jobs. Many Americans discriminated against African Americans even if they were only ⅛ African American. Americans were not ready to share their country and some would refuse to give people the rights they deserved. This can be seen in the Plessy vs Ferguson and Yick Wo vs Hopkins. In Plessy vs Ferguson, Plessy was asked to go to the back of the train because he was ⅛ African American.

    Read More

  • Black and White: A Visual Interpretation of Racism during the Vietnam War

    667 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...judicial belief that it was proper to separate white and black people for the benefit of white people.

    Read More

  • Omi And Winant Sociology Essay

    2669 Words  | 6 Pages

    Omi and Winant’s concept of racialization is formed around the theory that race is a social conception while Bonilla-Silva’s is formed around the theory of racialized social systems. We will first look at Omi and Winant, and then we’ll move onto Bonilla-Silva’s concept of racialization. Omi and Winant say “Within the contemporary social science literature, race is assumed to be a variable which is shaped by broader societal forces.” (Omi & Winant 1986, pg. 3) The racial line in the United States has been defined and reinforced over centuries. Whites are seen as a “pure” while those who are mixed are categorized as “nonwhite.” This sort of thinking comes from the idea of hypo-descent. The theory of hypo-descent is as follows: no matter how small the African American ancestry a person has, they are still considered African American. Marvin Harris said “The rule of hypo-descent is, therefore, an invention, which we in the United States have made in order to keep biological facts from intruding into our collective racist fantasies.” (Omi & Winant 1986, pg. 3) The notion of “passing” began after the implementation of hypo-descent. Individuals who are categorized as “black” according to hypo-descent attempt to bypass discriminatory barriers by “passing” for white. When an individual is “passing” they try to assimilate themselves into the other race. “Passing” made it to the Supreme Court with the Takao Ozawa case. Ozawa, a Japanese male, filed for United States citizenship under the Naturalization Act of 1906. Ozawa stated that he had assimilated to the “white” way of life and should be considered “white.” The Supreme Court found that only Caucasians were white, and the Japanese were an “unassimilated” race.

    Read More

  • Race in the United States: the 1940s

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    Race relations within the United States in the United States did improved, because of African Americans’ war efforts. This was because all of the African American fighting in the army were fighting for the United States, together with the whites, and the whole cause of the war was because a massive racism against the Jewish people in Europe, which made people wonder at why they were fighting against racism in Europe if they had it back in the United States. Besides this, many in the United States who fought against the fascist governments in Europe felt the equality that was given to them from the Europeans, but when they came back, they wondered why they fought for something that they did not receive back home.

    Read More

  • The Long Struggle for Civil Rights

    2179 Words  | 5 Pages

    African Americans have a history of struggles because of racism and prejudices. Ever since the end of the Civil War, they struggled to benefit from their full rights that the Constitution promised. The fourteenth Amendment, which defined national citizenship, was passed in 1866. Even though African Americans were promised citizenship, they were still treated as if they were unequal. The South had an extremely difficult time accepting African Americans as equals, and did anything they could to prevent the desegregation of all races. During the Reconstruction Era, there were plans to end segregation; however, past prejudices and personal beliefs elongated the process.

    Read More

  • Critical Race Theory Essay

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    Muhammad Ali, a famous boxer, once said, “Hating People because of their color is wrong. And it doesn’t matter which color does the hating. I’s just plain wrong” (Goodreads, 2015). For many centuries, ethnic conflict between the humans have existed immortally due the never changing differences of culture and values, spinning the cycle of war. Fortunately, some have ended however some still remain immortal in the eyes of those who have experience struggle to this date. The lack of awareness of problems in a cultural crisis concerning those who fall victim to a system and society that discriminates and alienates. With assistance of Critical Race Theory, this essay will examine how the role of race with has affected has caused consequences within the lives of marginalized groups within society through the lives and their relationship with those in their communities.

    Read More

  • Racial Formation Essay

    1303 Words  | 3 Pages

    That is where we see that the state and government have enormous power when it comes to defining what race actually is. The state can fundamentally shape your social status within their means. They have all access to one’s economic opportunities, including employment, and they also can control your political rights. The government pretty much has control of how you look and define yourself, but more importantly the control how others will define you. The state controls medical and research facilities and can influence all that fall under these categories, creating things such as race based

    Read More

  • Assimilation and U.S. Immigration Policy

    1558 Words  | 4 Pages

    America is a country that has an unspoken immigration policy, and that is based entirely upon race. This policy has been in effect since we began racial classifications. In J.L. Hochschild’s paper titled “Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850-1930 Mulattoes, Half Breeds, Mixed Parentage, Hindoos, and the Mexican Race. Studies in American Political Development.” The reorganization of races was rooted in who is and who isn’t white. What we honestly know is that being white carries a cache and that has never changed. It’s like having a backstage pass to the greatest rock concert ever performed. Everybody you tell wishes they were there too. Within that frame work a determination of whom would be included and who would be excluded would have to be made. Did Native Americans have the ability to assimilate, would Mexicans be included in the Jim Crow laws, and whether all Asians should be excluded from entering the country were questions white people would determine. (J. L. Hochschild 1) And, these questions would form the basis of each groups place on America’s racial totem pole. The focus of Professor Hochschild’s paper is that the Census Bureau is deeply implicated in the social construct of race, and precious little has changed in all that time.

    Read More

  • Race Essay

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    Broadly speaking, race is seen or is assumed to be a biologically driven set of boundaries that group and categorize people according to phenotypical similarities (e.g. skin color) (Pinderhughes, 1989; Root, 1998). The categorical classification of race can be traced back to the 16th century Linnaen system of human “races” where each race was believed to be of a distinct type or subspecies that included separate gene pools (Omi & Winant, 1994; Spickard, 1992; Smedley & Smedley, 2005). Race in the U.S. initially began as a general categorizing term, interchangeable with such terms as “type” or “species”. Over time, race began to morph into a term specifically referring to groups of people living in North America (i.e. European “Whites”, Native American “Indians”, and African “Negroes”). Race represented a new way to illustrate human difference as well as a way to socially structure society (Smedley & Smedley, 2005).

    Read More

  • The Naturalizing Act And The Naturalization Act

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    On March 26th in 1790 the congress enacted the Naturalization Act in the U.S.. Eight years later on June 18th President John Adams signed the Act into power in the U.S.. This Act was the first of four laws known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. The law was when immigrants moved into the U.S. they would have to live in one place for 14 years to have a chance to become a citizen. After their 14 years they would also have to add an additional 9 years in America. Also this law was to protect the nation from the enemy that wanted to weaken the inexperienced U.S. government. However the Democratic- Republicans did not agree and attacked the law as unconstitutional. It allowed immigrants that were not part of a nation that the U.S. was at war with at the time of application to become citizens. This of course left out indentured servants, slaves, and most women from being able to become citizens. This event is important to America because it is the first part of the sequence of laws that allows us to either be citizens of the USA or not to be citizens.

    Read More

More about The Role Of Immigrants In The Film Race II

Open Document