Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories and constructs of race
Theories and constructs of race
Theories and constructs of race
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Omi and Winant’s concept of racialization is formed around the theory that race is a social conception while Bonilla-Silva’s is formed around the theory of racialized social systems. We will first look at Omi and Winant, and then we’ll move onto Bonilla-Silva’s concept of racialization. Omi and Winant say “Within the contemporary social science literature, race is assumed to be a variable which is shaped by broader societal forces.” (Omi & Winant 1986, pg. 3) The racial line in the United States has been defined and reinforced over centuries. Whites are seen as a “pure” while those who are mixed are categorized as “nonwhite.” This sort of thinking comes from the idea of hypo-descent. The theory of hypo-descent is as follows: no matter how small the African American ancestry a person has, they are still considered African American. Marvin Harris said “The rule of hypo-descent is, therefore, an invention, which we in the United States have made in order to keep biological facts from intruding into our collective racist fantasies.” (Omi & Winant 1986, pg. 3) The notion of “passing” began after the implementation of hypo-descent. Individuals who are categorized as “black” according to hypo-descent attempt to bypass discriminatory barriers by “passing” for white. When an individual is “passing” they try to assimilate themselves into the other race. “Passing” made it to the Supreme Court with the Takao Ozawa case. Ozawa, a Japanese male, filed for United States citizenship under the Naturalization Act of 1906. Ozawa stated that he had assimilated to the “white” way of life and should be considered “white.” The Supreme Court found that only Caucasians were white, and the Japanese were an “unassimilated” race. Omi and Winant in their c... ... middle of paper ... ...an see the white systems that put them there. They aren’t more racist than whites, they aren’t granted the privilege of denial that whites have. (Wise, The Pathology of Privilege) I hope that I have proved that Omi and Winant’s concept of racialization is the closest to the truth. They trace the social concept of race back to its earliest construction during the sixteenth century through the Federal Housing Administration discrimination polices following the Second World War. Like how the game of Monopoly was construction, so is race. The goal of both Monopoly and race is to leave others at the bottom and be the only one top. The courts in our country have upheld race through cases like Plessy v. Ferguson which keeps blacks from becoming white. The system of race in the United States is constructed in a way were whites are dominant and other races are subordinate.
The two articles that had a profound impact to my understanding of race, class and gender in the United States was White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack by Peggy McIntosh and Imagine a Country by Holly Sklar. McIntosh explains the keys aspects of unearned advantage (a privilege that one group hold over another) as well as conferred dominance (the act of voluntarily giving another group power) and the relationship that these factors hold when determine power of a social group. Additionally, the purpose of McIntosh’s article was to demonstrate the privilege that certain individuals carry and how that translates to the social structures of our society. Furthermore, conferred dominance also contributes to the power of the dominant group
In the case of Ozawa vs. United States in 1922, a Japanese man who had lived in the US for 20 years applied for his naturalization. According to him, his skin was just as white as any white man, and he followed the American way of life, so he deserved to gain a citizenship. However, he was blatantly rejected because the Supreme Court ruled that a white person was only one who belonged to the Caucasian race, and he, was from the Mongoloid race according to science. (www.youtube.com/channel/UClmZ97t1t-qJPRFyKYi0jLQ. "RACE: The Power Of An Illusion - Episode 3: The House We Live In (PBS Documentary" YouTube. YouTube, 2016. Web. 18 Sept. 2016). However, when an Indian man, Bhagat Singh Thind, heard of this ruling, he immediately appealed for his citizenship, claiming that if only the Caucasian race was allowed nationality, then he certainly was a part of it, according to the research. Upon hearing this, the Supreme Court responded by arguing that science doesn’t prove if he is Caucasian or not, it’s the way a person looks and
Race-thinking: what is it? Isn’t the world past the issue of race? Do races even exist and if so, what does it mean to have a racial identity? Is colorblindness possible and how important is it? These are the questions Paul Taylor addresses in the book “Race: A Philosophical Introduction”. Paul Taylor is a self-proclaimed “radical constructionist” who will maintain that race is very real in our world and in the United States as a whole (p. 80). Taylor takes care to ensure he addresses the real needs concerning racial dynamics in the U.S., referencing historical events, prevailing policy affairs, and even pop culture to explain that everyone capable of forming opinions ought to have some sort of grasp of the concept of race-thinking. As Taylor will analyze, race and race-thinking “has shaped and continues to shape private interactions as well as the largest political choices” (p. 8). In other words, race-thinking encompasses everything we do and every interaction we have. In this paper I will attempt to interpret and expound Taylor’s views and definitions of race, concepts associated with race, and input my own interpretations as they are appropriate.
The legal boundaries between white and non-white have been, at least partially, defined through the struggles between Asian immigrants and the U.S. government at the turn of the 20th century. This process culminated with the Supreme Court’s decision on February 23, 1923, ruling that Bhagat Singh Thind, an Asian Indian immigrant, should not be considered a white person despite his claims of having Aryan ancestry, thus belonging to the Caucasian race (Hind...
Winant, Howard. 2000 "Race and race theory." Annual review of sociology ():-. Retrieved from http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/faculty/winant/Race_and_Race_Theory.html on Mar 17, 1980
Describe the Culture of Omelas and how you do you Think it got That way.
Racism is a problem that most people cannot see in today’s society. It hides itself in our everyday lives and we just tend to ignore it. It is well hidden because over the years it has changed its form from what we are used to into something that we just see as life screwing us over. In Howard Winant’s “Racism: From Domination to Hegemony,” he talks about how racism has changed from being about how one race dominates another to racial hegemony. He defines racial hegemony as “the routinized outcome of practices that create or reproduce hierarchical social structures based on essentialized racial categories” (Winant 129). Winant’s points that he declares in his essay is also seen in current events, such as the police brutality and the goals
The United States used racial formation and relied on segregation that was essentially applied to all of their social structures and culture. As we can see, race and the process of racial formation have important political and economic implications. Racial formation concept seeks to connect and give meaning to how race is shaped by social structure and how certain racial categories are given meaning our lives or what they say as “common sense” Omi and Winant seek to further explain their theory through racial
Racism and discrimination are common factors that current society faces, but these are not only contemporary problems. For instance, research has shown that since the nineteen century, “when cultural anthropology became an established academic discipline, one of the underlying objectives of the scholars in the field was to probe that blacks and other nonwhite ethnic groups were genetically and cognitive inferior than whites.” (The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 24) Through history constant studies and techniques have developed in order to test theories that justify discrimination, and as the quote states, one common goal was to establish white superiority among all races. This racist pattern has been repeated in America since the times
“White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools and blank checks” (McIntosh, 172). White privilege is all around us, but society has been carefully taught
First, let’s review our main terms that ties up the argument. Racism is a system of advantage based on race. This system of Advantage of race promote terms such as “The Dominate Group/Race” and “White privileges” by allows the creation of policies and practices that mostly benefits “The White Man”. “When racial prejudice is combined with social power- access to social, cultural, and economic resources and decision-making – leads to the institutionalization of ra...
Explanations that justify the use of racism directly relates to differential treatment of minority groups and contributes to racism’s existence as an unstoppable social problem. The foundations of these explanations are based on the common misunderstanding of the definition of race. Thus, problems that tend to concentrate in one race are mistakenly judged as “race problems”. This judgement leads to the establishment of a system of inequality between a superior race and inferior races. However, the logic behind these explanations don’t account for the true reasoning behind minority individuals value status. In fact, these explanations contribute to minority individuals’ further struggle in life.
Omi and Winant (1986) stated that Racial categories often consolidate its meaning by the particular social relations and history context(p.19). Bonilla-Silva(2003) purported that the early colonizer from the Europe named the people in the land which they invaded as “negro” and “Indian” to distinguish them from the noble European (p.34) In the early stages of United State, the race introduced as the tool for the slaveholder and other white class to legitimized the practice of slavery and disenfranchised the natural rights of African Americans. Even the other white immigrants were considered as an individual race when they first migrate to the United State. Thus the meaning of race are constantly shifting within the change of social relation and political background. For example, in the article written by M.Lee, the 1900 census has only five race categories comparing to the 1990 census which has more than ten race option, which means the conception of race are continuously shifting(p.4). Beside the social relations, we also discern race through the preemptive notion of what each racial groups looks like. The African American are generally portrayed as the people who have thick lips and black skin. An Asian American usually have small eyes and feeble physique. Those stereotypes about the people 's physical appearance forge the content of race and become the common way which we utilize to confirm one 's race
Throughout the film “Race III,” there were a lot of objectives in order to classify people of being white and being eligible of becoming naturalized U.S. citizen. We saw how immigrants started get categorized as a certain racial group. Depending on not only where you traveled from, but highly depending on the color of your body features. Biology was destiny. Which side you found yourself in the racial divide was a matter of life or death. Even those of lighter skin tones were sometimes subjected to being classified as non whites. States started to makes rules and regulations to classify these immigrants. Depending on the state you could change your race. This is because some stated ruled that having a certain percentage of African American in you makes you fully black. Most states varied, making it all extremely unfair.
You never really know how much impact a simple class may have on you until you really take it. I have taken enough classes all of which gave me the same outcome, which is a step closer to my degree however; there are some classes that you will always remember. Most of the time the classes that you should remember are the ones that teach about the ins and outs of the specific career you wish to pursue. Sometimes those classes are not even the ones that stick to you. Sometimes the classes that you will always remember are those easy electives that you sign up for in hopes of getting an easy A. I remember signing up for one class thinking that it would be a breeze to take, but my predictions were definitely wrong. From taking a simple Spanish