Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Key influences that impact upon the learning process of individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Relationship Between Knowledge-Telling and Knowledge-Transforming Strategies
Murray and Martlew have two contrasting schools of thought, both
aiming to achieve effective writing. The following discussion will
explore the characteristics of the expert writer and the beginner and
what makes effective writing. I will examine and contrast the two
models of writing, shed light on the strengths of Murray’s and
Martlew’s statement in the context of understanding the effectiveness
of the use of the knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming
models. First, let us consider the aspects of elementary writing, we
can best understand this by understanding how most children write.
Children’s writing has a low tendency to be connected to particular
contexts, they may have poor or unclear logic in their writing (http://www.english.uiuc.edu/405/Witt/Writing-Project/writing-development.htm[26.11.01]).
Children while writing may have poor planning and they may write
whatever enters their heads with little concern as to whether the
writing connects to what was previously written. If more material is
required they may add information without selecting and noticing the
relevance of the added information
(http://www.english.uiuc.edu/405/Witt/Writing-Project/writing-development.htm
[26.11.01]). Bereiter and Scardamalia argue that the writing process
of a young student when compared to that of a mature skilled writer
will have a vast difference, they can’t be the same, the skilled
writer produces a different kind of writing process, the unskilled
writer is incapable of such abilities (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996, p.117).
According to Bereiter and Scarda...
... middle of paper ...
...ferences:
Beard, R. (1993) teaching Literacy balancing Perspectives, Hodder &
Stoughton, London, U.K.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987) The psychology of written
composition, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum cited in Theory and practice of
writing, Grabe & Kaplan.
Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R.B. (1996) Theory and practice of writing Addison
Wesley Longman Limited, Harlow, Essex, England.
Martlew, M. (1983) The Psychology of Written Language, Developmental
and Educational Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, U.K.
Protherough, R. (1983) Encouraging writing, Methuen & Co. Ltd, London,
U.K.
Ferneaux, C. Process writing,
http://www.rdg.ac.uk/AcaDepts/cl/slals/process.htm (26.11.01)
Writing Development,
http://www.english.uiuc.edu/405/Witt/Writing_Project/writing_development.htm
(26.11.01)
According to Runciman, there are many plausible reasons that students and other people don’t enjoy writing. Evidence, assumptions, and language and tone are the basis for which Runciman makes his argument. Overall, this argument is effective because reliable and well known sources are used in a logical fashion. Also, the assumptions made about the audience are accurate and believable. Runciman used his assumptions wisely when writing his claim and in turn created a compelling, attention capturing argument. The article was written so that students and teachers at any level could understand and easily read it. This argument is interesting, captivating, relevant through its age, and can relate to students and teachers at almost every academic level.
This assignment is a testament of growth and contributed to my outlook on strategies towards improving my writing through the importance of understanding how crucial, each component of the writing process is and how in depth you should take each process. Lastly, this reflection advocated how editing is the principal task of every good writer. “To write is human, to edit is divine,” Stephen
“Although both articles are exploring writing and the change that needs to or that does happen, Peter Elbow’s idea of growth in writing is a more naïve and simplistic approach to writing, where as Somers and Saltz’s article, while still very general, takes a more realistic point of view at the writing experience for students and new writers”.
In Donald M. Murrays’s essay “What is Practical Education” he explains his reasoning behind why he allowed his students to write badly. He shares his own experience with police-like teachers who drove him to hate writing. In hopes of helping his students find their voice he allows his students to write the words down as they come, no matter how awkward they sound. Often times they find out that they have more to say then they thought. Rhetorical devices are used to help the readers relate to his point of view on writing.
In my opinion it is very valuable to improve knowledge and practice continually. Everything changes with time so our knowledge and practice have to be kept up to date and also we must keep expanding our awareness. For example, learning new skills will help us improve our performance.
One important aspect is the teacher can target the individual needs of each student during a guided session through observation and review of their work as they are writing (Fellowes & Oakley, 2014). The educator can assist a child’s skill in writing purpose through providing the topic of the writing and manufacturing the type of text that will be written. A guided writing approach enables students to organise their thoughts into a structured scenario through a prior planning where students plan out what and how they want to put their words into composition (Lan, Hung & Hsu, 2011). Vygotsky emphasised the importance of a scaffolded classroom, where in groups children of lesser skill, for example in grammar, can be supported and guided by those who are more competent in that skill (Gibson, 2008). In a guided setting, the teacher would maintain control of the group by setting the context of the activity, then as the students begin to write they gain responsibility of their writing with the teacher available for support to the individuals in the group who need a little extra assistance with grammar or text organisation (Hyland,
Although many will argue that great writing will require time and practice, opponents claim that great writing is like a puzzle which means one can put the pieces together to create an astonishing puzzle. This was the case when I was a 10th grade. As a tyro, I didn’t know much about writing elements and styles. Fortunately, one of my English teachers, Mrs. Roberson, change my outlook on writing. She taught me countless techniques. From that point, I started reading books to increase my knowledge and vocabulary. This was an incredibly wondrous experience for me. I was learning new information while expanding my learning capacity. This was stupendous. It was a life-changing moment for me. Throughout my high school journey,
I fully agree with the author’s agreement due to that I have seen the difference between grade school, high school, and college writing skills. In elementary school, children are being taught how the student’s state is requiring them to learn how to write an essay. Thus, allowing the students to have a firm foundation of technique and style, but little creativity when it comes to assignments.
I’ve chosen to emphasize on the “Writing Process” as the subject for this reflective introduction, using my literacy narrative paper, “Mother Knows Best,” as an example on how significant this learning outcome has been to my growth in this course and as a writer. I chose this learning outcome because as I look back I remember that I had the same thought process with each project that was given to us. After much deliberation, the writing process is an essential part of making a good paper, and will become important to me with future papers in both school and hopefully, my career.
In this era, that we called knowledge workers era, knowledge is extremely important in order to gain sustainable competitive advantage according to Yaghoubi (2014). Organization can obtain, capture and utilize knowledge with the help of management to protect and keep the sustainability in long period. Knowledge management is use to maintaining success of organization. Knowledge management is process of creating and developing knowledge in organization with systematically effort to find, to create, to make access and to apply all intangible resources and to flourish the learning process in organization.
Nancy Sommers directs her attention to the student-teacher comparison of writing. Sommers lecture, “Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers” explains the different point of views students, the unskilled writers, and the professors, the well-skilled writers point of view of revision strategies. For instance, the way teachers explain revision strategies are by their form and engagement throughout their writing. On the other hand, students believed rewording was the finest way
When thinking of the knowledge we have today, we realize that some of it is different to what it may have been in the past. The knowledge issue that arises from the statement, “That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow,” is on what we can believe to “know” today, if it can be proven false tomorrow. “Knowledge that is accepted” is another way of saying that it’s what is generally believed by everyone, but that it’s sometimes “discarded,” which is another way of saying that some knowledge is updated or cast away as false. The problem is that people strive to gain knowledge, which can be classified as false, which makes gaining knowledge pointless after a time. I’ll be focusing on how the areas of knowledge, history and the natural sciences to be specific, are major proponents of this concept. Knowledge has never been concrete because of the way people change their views on the histories and natural sciences. I think history is consistently recorded and “revised” by many historians, and consistently gets discarded when it isn’t necessary anymore. What is accepted universally in the natural sciences is that there is always more to be discovered when it comes to what is already known, which in turn can disprove itself. It’s important to note that we are bound by the ways of knowing, as well, because it’s about how our reason and language are used, that also result in new knowledge being formed while old knowledge becomes rendered useless. There is also the counter-argument that knowledge in mathematics because it follows the principle of only having one correct answer, thus it can never be proven wrong. But, to start off, history is usually full of information that is important then gets buried with new ...
Writing and Learning Disabilities International: Overcoming Learning Difficulties 6.3 (2006): 347-67. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.
Rather than seeing pre-writing, writing, and revision as three separate and linear stages, Flower and Hayes point out that “revision, as it is carried out by skilled writers, is not an ‘end-of-the-line’ repair process, but is a constant state of ‘re-vision’ or re-seeing that goes on while they are composing,” (367). Similarly, in my protocol analysis, I do not perform writing and revision as two separate stages. Instead, I’m constantly reworking sentences as I write them, melding these two stages into a single, continual process. Additionally, Flower and Hayes point out that these concrete stages limit the writing process and that “the sharp distinctions stage models make between the operations of planning, writing, and revising may seriously distort how these activities work,” (367). Similarly, my protocol analysis would reflect this notion—that the perception of writing as a series of stages does not actually reflect how many people think about writing. Although it can be used as a pedagogical tool for inexperienced writers, the expectation that more experienced writers write in such a disjointed manner does not reflect the cognitive processes that go into
Knowledge can be interpreted in many different ways. Some may see knowledge as learned education. Others may see education as intelligence. None of these perspectives of knowledge are right or wrong. Every person is entitled to their own definition, source, and use of knowledge in their lives. I view knowledge as the wisdom and insight that one may acquire over time, by personal experiences and influences in life.