Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on human nature
Effects of technology on human nature
Introduction of technology influences the lives of individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on human nature
Today, we are a civilized civilization, with new technologies being invented every day. From the computer, to the iphone our innovations have made our lives easier in many ways. However, what we neglect is our attention and noticement of the natural world. Poets Stephen Boyer and William Carlos Williams both address this theme in their poems “#uploading nature” and “The Red Wheelbarrow.” In both of these poems, the poets displays how the separation between the natural, pure world and the modern, materialistic world, affect our actions. The use of a form of transportation is a common thread in both poems that create the separation between the natural world and the modern world. While the form of transportation differs between the two poems, …show more content…
In general, as humans we are more apt to go with the more popular idea, yet both poets portray that the speaker is thinking for themselves and taking the time to value both sides. William Carlos Williams uses a specific word, besides, to portray this thematic importance. “Beside the/ white rabbits.” The juxtoposition of the rabbits to the wheelbarrow portray the differences between the modern and natural world. The use of the world besides, tells that the speaker is not immersed in either side and is stuck in between. This indecision is also present in Boyer’s poem. Boyer’s indecision is shown by the separation in ideas, instead of the use of placing nouns. “?”. The speakers in both poems act as a microcosm for the feeling of many people at this time period and the indecision that exists about whether or not to join the modern world. Both speakers have a sense of connection towards nature, yet are pushed into the natural world by others. Both Boyer and Williams, however, speak about while indecisiveness exists, the push is towards the modern world and people are not trying to hold on to the natural past. However, Boyer and Williams are trying to hold on to their natural roots as depicted by the speakers inability to full connect with either
Williams’ minimalist writing style employed free verse and by maintaining simplicity allowed the wheelbarrow to be the center of attention. He accomplished this task by breaking up the poem, which consisted of one sentence, into eight lines and further divided it into couplets. The beginning line of each couplet was longer than the second line, which only had one word. This formation allowed the reader to focus on specific words before moving to the next line. This is best illustrated in the opening lines, “so much depends/upon,” (Williams 288). Already, Williams has established the importance of the object by conveying to the reader that many things are dependent on the object. It is also significant that none of the words in the poem are capitalized nor did Williams
In nature, someone can hear the sounds of a creek flowing and birds chirping and insects buzzing; in civilization, someone can hear engines roaring, people chattering, and buildings being built. In nature, one feels happiness and contentment; in civilization, one feels guilt and misery and sorrow. These simplicities of nature are what appeals to William Cullen Bryant in the poem ‘Inscription for the Entrance to a Wood’. The poem tells the reader that nature is a happier place than civilization and that nature gives one the answers to their existence and problems of life that civilization created. Civilization is ugly and corrupt while nature is beauty and tranquility.
Lopez invites us to partake in the spiritual connection we share with nature and history, which awards us both independence in our world and compelling attachment to it. He bids us to notice the "complexity of [nature's] beauty" (54), and-like the effect it continues to have on Barry Lopez time and time again-to let it render us speechless.
To show their audience that their appreciation for nature is very strong and dear, both authors use diction to describe the beauty and feeling of being surrounded by nature. In his poem, William
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
Daniel Duane addresses a pressing modern anxiety surrounding technology’s destruction of the natural world. Duane is an author of seven books and many articles featured in The New York Times and Food & Wine. Also an editor for Men’s Journal, Duane’s experiences in rock climbing, science, and the beauty of the outdoors make his writings seem more passionate and credible. He recently wrote the article “The Unnatural Kingdom” in The New York Times explaining his ideas towards technological advancements and their effects on wildlife. In his article, Duane offers insights to the question, “If technology helps save the wilderness, will the wilderness still be wild?” (Duane 1). He utilizes kairos, pathos, ethos, logos, and other rhetorical devices,
Richard Louv’s Last Child in the Woods shatters the rose colored lenses in which we view the world. No longer is nature respected, as we have always thought, and rising technology is as Louv writes “ quickly becoming the hottest add-on since rearview mirror fuzzy dice.” This nostalgic reference is one of many in this passage, and brings the reader to think about how much the world has changed. No longer is a simple fuzzy die on your car mirror sought after. Now it’s the new GPS system in the dash or the rear seat television for some “little backseat peace” to Louv this is one of many examples of how separated we have become with a simplistic nature. Louv’s use of rhetorical strategies, such as nostalgia, pathos, and ethos, proves his belief that humans have become separated from nature.
The poetry by these two poets creates several different images, both overall, each with a different goal, have achieved their purposes. Though from slightly different times, they can both be recognized and appreciated as poets who did not fear the outside, and were willing to put themselves out there to create both truth and beauty.
Blackmur's remarks apply equally well to The Waste Land, where syntactical sequence is given up for a structure depending on the perception of relationships between disconnected word-groups. To be properly understood, these word-groups must be juxtaposed with one another and perceived simultaneously. Only when this is done can they be adequately grasped; for, while they follow one another in time, their meaning does not depend on this temporal relationship. The one difficulty of these poems, which no amount of textual exegesis can wholly overcome, is the internal conflict between the time-logic of language and the space-logic implicit in the modern conception of the nature of poetry.
One part of this difference in the structure of the poem, as Traveling has elements that allow it to be a slower more contemplative poem. While Traveling shares with Woodchucks a majority for end stopped lines, it lakes the latters rhyme scheme. This helps to keep the poem from building much rhythm. In addition, there are several examples of caesura in the poem such as “that road is narrow; to swerve might make more dead” and “and stood by the heap, a doe, a recent killing.” These inline breaks help to create natural pauses in the poem, much like the narrator stopping and thinking, which sharply contrasts to the quick, rushed pace of the narrator in
...the role of the individual's relationship with the rest of the world and also the nature of individuality. They emphasize how the society might influence ones perception and ideas but reveal that ultimately it is up to the individual to choose in what to believe. The ideas shared between the two poets are centered on the desire for a more personal
William Carlos Williams was fascinated by the ways in which living organisms and inert matter occupy space--how they move in it, or cannot move, are cramped or allowed to roam freely--and how the space inside organisms and matter is charted, perceived, and manipulated. Williams's preoccupation with actual space in the material world is paralleled by his formal experimentations with the placement of words on the page. "Without invention nothing is well spaced" (P 50), Williams writes at the beginning of "Sunday in the Park," raising the question, what does "well spaced" mean for Williams? How can the world and how can poetry be well spaced? The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between Williams's use of what I will call spatial rhythms and the vision of poetry that emerges in "Sunday in the Park"--a section of Paterson particularly important for thinking about Williams's late poetic style because it contains the famous section beginning "The descent beckons / as the ascent beckoned," marking Williams's invention of the triadic stanza with "variable foot," a form he would begin to use frequently in the 1950's. My hope is to offer a new perspective on Williams's poetics by showing how it is rooted in a conception of space, both external and internal or biological, that is constantly moving in a rhythmic fashion.
Both “The Clan of One-Breasted Women” and “An Entrance to the Woods,” gives a viewpoint on the human relationship with nature. Terry Tempest Williams critizes man for being ruthless when it comes to nature and other humans. Wendell Berry believes similarly the same thing. He believes that man needs nature just as much as they need civilization. However, regardless of the differences, both writers offer an insightful perspective on the forever changing relationship between man and nature. And this relationship is, and always will be, changing.
Nature and civilization have always shared a strong bond and; as seen throughout history, when human interaction challenges this bond a tension between Mother Nature and humankind arises. One job of the poet is to reveal this tension through his or her poetry in an attempt to quell the quarreling. Percy Shelley was one such poet that viewed society as being fractured from nature and throughout his poetry one can find examples of this as well as of the benefits from society becoming synchronized with the world. Timothy Morton’s “Within You Without You”; a section within The Cambridge Companion to Shelley, attempts to summarize Shelley’s argument in his poetry that mankind and Mother Nature are in a state of disagreement and need to reconcile to be harmonious. Although Morton accurately analyses the majority of Shelly’s works, which leads to theories that can apply universally in his poetry, some of the statements Morton presents challenge what the poet wrote.
Although the poetry was produced in different years and each has different authors, the similarities undeniably outweigh the differences. Thus, attempting to contrast the two pieces is simple because of the common ties each poem posseses. Due to the similarity in topic, the additional differences that exist between writers appear to weaken leaving the unifying focus certain.