Analysis Of Traveling Through The Dark

1266 Words3 Pages

Traveling through the Dark by William Stafford and Woodchucks by Maxine Kumin are both short poems dealing with cruel acts perpetrated towards animals. In Traveling Through the Dark this takes the form of the author pushing a dead deer, pregnant with a still alive foal, off a cliff. Meanwhile, in Woodchucks the narrator attempts to gas and later shoots the title animal in a manner reminiscent of Nazi’s persecution of Jews in the Holocaust. While these poems are on similar topics, differences in their meaning appear when looking deeper. Woodchucks uses a fairly regular rhyme scheme and a series of short sentences and phrases, diction heavy with weapon references and allusions to historical atrocities, and detailed descriptions to create a maniacal tone, which is thus critical of many human actions. Meanwhile, Traveling uses a form similar to a couplet but lacking rhyme and meter and with an extra stanza, an emphasis on car diction and interesting use of pronouns, and description shifting from the deer to the car, creating a tone threat shifts from reverent to distant, making the actions of the speaker seem weighty, but necessary. …show more content…

One part of this difference in the structure of the poem, as Traveling has elements that allow it to be a slower more contemplative poem. While Traveling shares with Woodchucks a majority for end stopped lines, it lakes the latters rhyme scheme. This helps to keep the poem from building much rhythm. In addition, there are several examples of caesura in the poem such as “that road is narrow; to swerve might make more dead” and “and stood by the heap, a doe, a recent killing.” These inline breaks help to create natural pauses in the poem, much like the narrator stopping and thinking, which sharply contrasts to the quick, rushed pace of the narrator in

Open Document