Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of technology in environment conservation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of technology in environment conservation
Daniel Duane addresses a pressing modern anxiety surrounding technology’s destruction of the natural world. Duane is an author of seven books and many articles featured in The New York Times and Food & Wine. Also an editor for Men’s Journal, Duane’s experiences in rock climbing, science, and the beauty of the outdoors make his writings seem more passionate and credible. He recently wrote the article “The Unnatural Kingdom” in The New York Times explaining his ideas towards technological advancements and their effects on wildlife. In his article, Duane offers insights to the question, “If technology helps save the wilderness, will the wilderness still be wild?” (Duane 1). He utilizes kairos, pathos, ethos, logos, and other rhetorical devices, …show more content…
One strength of his article is that it can easily elicit an emotional response from the more sympathetic readers and outdoor enthusiasts. Duane appeals to pathos when first setting the scene of a day in the wilderness. He describes what it would be like if one had the “good fortune” to spot a Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep in the wild. He writes, “You unwrap a chocolate bar amid breathtaking views . . . the sight fills you with awe and also with gratitude for the national parks, forests, and yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive” (Duane 1). For the audience that connects to this emotional appeal, this instantly draws them in to the article and can arouse feelings of amazement and wonder toward the sight described. It can likewise leave readers wondering whether or not this scene is truly so perfect. This statement can also appear too dramatic for those less passionate. When Duane writes, “The sight fills you with . . . gratitude for the . . . yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive,” it seems almost untrue, as most people do not think twice about the environmental regulations that keep animals in their …show more content…
He does this because his facts are shocking in themselves. Duane writes, “Grizzlies are the California state animal . . . despite the fact that no grizzly has been sighted in California since wolves disappeared, in 1924” (Duane 8). Duane also mentions, “People have always manipulated the natural world” (Duane 3), and then supports it with facts such as, “The most primitive farms are human-managed ecosystems; European aristocrats fenced off game reserves in Middle Ages . . . government agencies have long dumped hatchery-raised trout into streams so that we can have fun catching them” (Duane 4). These facts alone are self-explanatory and surprising. By additionally stating the facts in a negative manner and context, Duane enhances his
Cronon, William “The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature” ed., Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1995, 69-90
“If you want to think about why humans are so dangerous to other species, you can picture a poacher in Africa carrying and Ak-47/ better still, you can picture yourself, holding a book on your lap” (Kolbert 266). This excerpt alone sets up the dark narrative that lies within The Sixth Extinction. It is uncomfortable to think about the impact that humans have on the environment on a global scale; however, it is nearly unbearable to recognize individual actions such as reading a book, directly contribute to the devastation of the earth.
Environmentalist and desert-lover, Edward Abbey in his essay “The Great American Desert” warns readers about the perilous dangers of the American deserts while simultaneously stirring curiosity about these fascinating ecosystems. He both invites and dissuades his readers from visiting the deserts of North America through the use of humor and sarcasm. In this essay, he is rhetorically successful in arguing that the open spaces of the undeveloped deserts are sacred places in need of respect and protection through his clever use of pathos and logos.
While describing his trip to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, President Carter paints and appealing picture in the minds of Americans. He mentions a “brilliant mosaic of wildflowers, mosses and lichens that hugged the tundra” (paragraph 2). As these words roll off this tongue, a beautiful landscape rolls into the minds of Americans. Furthermore, President Carter details “As the never-setting sun circled above the horizon, we watched muskox … lumber along braided rivers that meander toward the Beaufort Sea.” (paragraph 2) After hearing this description, an elegant sunset and with innocent animals roaming about pops into mind. Picturing the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in this alluring manner will greatly decrease the desire to harm it. By utilizing imagery, President Carter convinces Americans of the beauty of the reserve and therefore the need to preserve
What does a man do when the canyon that he so dearly loves is transformed into an unrecognizable monstrosity at the hands of others that have no affinity to the area they have destroyed? Some may bemoan the destruction, yet lament that what’s done is done and move on. Others may voice their concerns with the unsightliness they see. However, rarely does one voice their views in such a poignant and direct way as to grab the attention of the reader and powerfully force the writer’s views into the mind of the reader. The essay “The Damnation of a Canyon” by Edward Abbey is a revealing look into the mind of an environmental activist and his dissatisfaction with man’s detrimental impacts on the environment and the natural world. Edward Abbey is acclaimed
The wild is a place to push yourself to the limit and take a look at who you truly are inside. “Wilderness areas have value as symbols of unselfishness” (Nash). Roderick Nash’s philosophy states that the wilderness gives people an opportunity to learn humility but they fight this because they do not have a true desire to be humble. Human-kind wants to give out the illusion that they are nature lovers when in reality, they are far from it. “When we go to designated wilderness we are, as the 1964 act says, "visitors" in someone else's home” (Nash). People do not like what they cannot control and nature is uncontrollable. Ecocentrism, the belief that nature is the most important element of life, is not widely accepted. The novel Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer depicts a young boy who goes on an exploration to teach himself the true concept of humility. Chris McCandless, the protagonist, does not place confidence in the universal ideology that human beings are the most significant species on the planet, anthropocentrism.
Robbins, Jim. Last Refuge: The Environmental Showdown in Yellowstone and the American West. New York: Morrow, 1993. Print.
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
In Wallace Stegner’s “Wilderness Letter,” he is arguing that the countries wilderness and forests need to be saved. For a person to become whole, Stegner argues that the mere idea of the wild and the forests are to thank. The wilderness needs to be saved for the sake of the idea. He insinuates that anyone in America can just think of Old faithful, Mt. Rainier, or any other spectacular landform, even if they have not visited there, and brought to a calm. These thoughts he argues are what makes us as people whole.
At the same time Thoreau often lamented science’s tendency to kill poetry. The scientific writings of others and his own careful observations often revealed life to him, but at other times rendered nature lifeless. (4) Modern-day Thoreauvians are also aware of science’s role in the imperialistic conquest of nature. We love the wild, yet science has largely become a tool for control, commodification and increased consumption, rather than for the appreciation and protection of nature. (5) The proper role of science in human society and in our own lives is thus an important issue.
It is interesting to think that society today can justify or criticize its action with a piece of literature or movie. Today, humans can be blamed for the maltreatment toward nature, as well as all the issues that have resulted from it. These issues, as a result of treating nature as an object that continuously yields necessities for humans, like water, only causes us to approach nature as a symbol of necessity, rather than an entity whom provides the population of the Earth with stable nutrition and habitat for survival. From this, it can be determined that popular culture reflects human treatment and view of nature, mirroring the scarring of nature by human interaction and degradation of nature.
By the end of this short story you can see that Forester wanted to make sure that his point was made clear to his audience. “To breathe in the silence of nature, appreciate the scent of beauty and enjoy the fruits of creation in its lakes, streams and the tinkling of poplar leaves during the autumn. Without a doubt, this experience and the presence of wildlife enhance an escape from the stress of our everyday lives.” (Provencher) Nature is an element of life that every human being needs to experience. So, we must be careful to not let the advancement of technology rod of us of this joy.
Nature has been by and large expressed through the color green in art, film, photography, and life. For some of us, nature is a memory; a green place buried in our minds of a vacation to the Sequoias, an apple orchard, the home garden, or a television program on the planet earth. It’s no mistake that nature simultaneously awakens all our senses and makes us aware of its presence. There are many cultural movements today who defend the habitat of nature; with full-hearted attempts to hold corporations responsible for their neglectful destruction of “nature”.
The road to preservation has always been a difficult one. With a rapidly changing world the environmentalists have to present their way of thinking in a manner that is appealing to the modern age. Edward Abbey and David Brower faced this challenge in their field as they worked to persuade others that the development of nature is not always the best option. Edward Abbey’s area of focus was national parks, monuments and forests, and how industrial tourism is hurting their pureness. He explains the problems with industrial tourism and how it can be stopped in the way of removing cars, stopping road building and encouraging more active park rangers in National Parks. David Brower takes a different approach by combating acts of developments as they occur. He manages to go head to head with Charles Park, Charles Fraser, and Floyd Dominy, three men with goals of development in various parts of nature with their own beliefs on development and how it should be handled. As Brower and Abbeys life are analyzed their similarities and differences become more apparent and it becomes obvious that they had very similar mind sets.
Ecology was a field of particular interest during the early and mid-1900’s, as farming across the Midwest grew and game and fur hunting had reached a new popularity. Aldo Leapold, for one, foresaw the environmental impact of overhunting first hand. Wanting to increase the deer population, hunters were encouraged to kill predators of the deer. Before long, the increased deer population began to cause problems in the ecosystem, as the removal of predators severely shifted nature out of equilibrium. By studying this sort of relationship between predators and prey, Leopold then extrapolated this relationship to all parts of an ecosystem, including humans’ interactions with the land. Leopold summarizes this in his Land Ethic, where he claims “the land ethic changes the role of Homo sapiens from conqueror of the land-community to plain member and citizen of it” (Leopol...