Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Traditional school calendar
History of a traditional school calendar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Traditional school calendar
Family vacations, pool memberships, and corn de-tasseling; these have been the experiences of traditional Midwestern summers. For centuries young American children have attended school during the winter months, during farming off seasons when their families could afford to be without them. Families have grown accustomed to a traditional school calendar that provides time for bonding throughout the year. Students have grown accustomed to an eight week break during the summer months where they are allowed to refresh their minds before returning for a new school year. Unfortunately, these traditional experiences and practices are now in jeopardy. In today’s race to improve student achievement, traditional school calendars have become a point of contention. Today more and more school districts and parents alike have begun to debate the pros and cons of an alternative school calendar.
According to writer Vanessa St Gerard from The Education Digest, a traditional school year is defined as “large blocks of instruction with inter-spread week-long breaks, all culminating with a long summer break” (2007). This structure is most familiar to Americans today, however the new alternative schedule presents a variance in the time allocated for breaks throughout the school year. “During a modified school year, instruction periods typically are broken up into 45-or-60-day sessions with each of these being divided by breaks lasting three to four weeks” (St Gerard, 2007). In the alternative calendar, schools would still break for a summer session, but in most cases the break would consist of about five weeks rather than eight. While the calendars might differ in session times, they would both meet the federally mandated 180 days of ins...
... middle of paper ...
...l). Year-Round Schools Look Better All the Time. The
Education Digest, 72(8), 56-58. Retrieved November 29, 2011, from Education
Periodicals. (Document ID: 1253545861).
Thomma, S. (2009). Politics. Obama Presses for Longer School Year | Seattle Times Newspaper.
The Seattle Times | Seattle Times Newspaper. Retrieved December 01, 2011, from http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2008838703_schools11.html
Werner, Erica. (2010, September 27). Obama: School Year Should Be Longer. Breaking News
and Opinion on The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 01, 2011, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/28/obama-school-year-should-_n_741338.html
UBIÑAS, L. A., & GABRIELI, C. (2011, August 22). Shortchanged by the Bell. New York
Times. Retrieved November 30, 2011, from
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/23/opinion/shortchanged-by-the-school-bell.html?_r=
The change of the system to include summer breaks was due to issues not quite under their
One of the most talked about issues of schooling today, would be year round schooling. The program started as a new way to learn. The old way and still the way most schools calendar is set up was designed the way it is due to harvest times, when the United States was a farming country. There have been many studies done, and some schools have already implemented this program. The studies and the schools that have gone ahead and implemented the program have seen both good things and bad things in their findings. There will be both pros and cons for every issue, and some may see pros and cons differently. Year round schooling is the idea of attending school for an entire year, not all 365 days, but continuously throughout the year. Year round schooling operates on a different schedule to incorporate the same amount of classroom time as a typical school schedule has. The only difference is that the breaks are shorter, but there are more of them in year round schooling. This is the basis of most of the arguments for and against year round schooling.
The United States has a long and proud history of providing public education to its citizen’s children. The fundamental idea behind the creation of this educational system was that it be available to all, regardless of geographical location or family status. In the era that this initiative was generated many of America’s families lived and worked on farms, and children were a vital part of this lifestyle. The founders of the United States’ public schools had to create a plan that included all children, even those who were expected to perform agricultural work in the harvest season. Thus, the nine-month school calendar was brought into use, allowing farming children a three month break from school in the summer to aid their families in the crop yield. In time, youth participation in farming became outdated and obsolete, and this arrangement slipped from necessity to simply being a tradition held on to through the years. In our modern era, a year-round school calendar would benefit the teachers, students, and finances of America’s public schools.
This research indicates that those in support of this type of calendar see many benefits, but the most strongly supported evidence is the reduction of summer learning loss experienced by students, especially for English as a second language (ESL) and low income students. For those who oppose the balanced school year, some believe summer learning loss does not exist and some strongly argue that changing the school calendar is only warranted with proof of increased academic achievement for students. The Vancouver School Board is considering implementing a calendar change; in a June 2010 memorandum sent for review, “Balanced School Calendars: Pros and Cons” by Superintendent of Schools Steve Cardwell, the report summary states “the ever changing composition and needs of the students in this district make it reasonable to question whether a traditional school calendar remains the most beneficial option for our students” (1).... ... middle of paper ...
There are various models of YRS that can be implemented, all of which are reconfigurations of the traditional, nine-month calendar. In some areas these models are known as alternative or modified calendars (Shields & Oberg, 2000) and they all have unique characteristics. Because of theses differences, school systems should spend some time analyzing which model will be best for their particular school; educators may find that some models work better than others depending on the school. Estimates on the exact number of year round schedules vary, although it has been estimated that at least 50 different scheduling patterns exist (Palmer & Bemis, 1999). The most common alternatives include the single track calendar and the multi-track calendar.
They change how the March Break looks as a break compared to the Winter Break, so it would be like from an enjoyable March Break to just a couple of days off school. If teachers are willing to give up a week for March Break, they might as well just give up another week.... ... middle of paper ... ... March is the arrival of a beautiful season, spring.
Today however, the role of the modern public school is beginning to change. The United States is no longer an agrarian society. As a result, people feel that the traditional school calendar is too old-fashioned a...
Rivera, E. (2003). It’s August, but for some, vacation’s over; Arlington Elementary pupils begin test of year-round school. The Washington Post, B.01. Retrieved March 3, 2005, from Proquest database.
The traditional school calendar is what is comfortable. It is like the childhood blanket that no one wants to give up, but eventually it must be. It just simply does not make sense anymore. Dr. Daniel A. Domenech opens his article, “Should Students Attend School Year Round?” with this idea. He says that this typical schooling system was established originally to allow students time to help out on their family farms. (Domenech). Domenech not only taught for 36 years in public education, but he was also President at American Association of School Administrators, Inc. He obviously is extremely familiar with this topic and also the debate about whether all schools should begin to operate on a full year calendar. He goes forward by saying that it is no longer a mostly agricultural society and is an extremely outdated calendar. Mary O’Sullivan agrees with Domenech and further explains why the system was originally practical in her essay, “The 10-Month School Year: Are We Ignoring Educational Research in order to Preserve Summer Vacation? Finding a Compromise Between Educational Advancement and Over-Schooling.” O’Sullivan says, “…the majority of the school-aged c...
When we think of year-round schooling, we automatically think of no summer vacation. Across the country, schools are changing their schedules to a year-round curriculum. A year-round curriculum means that students and teachers no longer have two months of summer vacation. Some parents and teachers have enjoyed the year-round schedule, others do not approve. There are some schools that are implementing the year-round program to have more consistent instruction, while other schools are doing it in order to save money. Each schedule has its own pros and cons.
Imagine your self in the middle of July the sun is shining the birds are chirping with no clouds in the sky and you are sitting in a classroom with no air condition. All you can think about is going outside to play but you have to learn. This is what would happen if schools turned to year round schooling. So year round schooling is a bad idea.
“As determined by the New York State Board of Regents (1978), this school schedule encouraged forgetting. Longer breaks between formal instruction inhibited a student's ability to retain information.” (Woodward, 1995). Many year-round school advocates also argue that year-round school will ease overcrowding, enhance student learning and retention, and reduce cost. (Ballinger, 1988). Alcorn (1992) stated, "If students' longest break from the classroom is one month instead of three, it is possible to avoid what can be called the long summer of forgetting”(p.13). Ballinger (1988) asserts that it is time for a change in the school calendar because “the customary long summer vacation disrupts the continuity of instruction that curriculum planners desire.” He states that a less interrupted flow of instruction will help and enhance the knowledge learned of most able students by not reviewing at the beginning of each year and wasting time.
First I need to explain that this is different from extending the school year; on a year round schedule, students attend school the same number of days-180-as students on the traditional nine-month calendar. The difference is that year round education (YRE) students have several short vacations rather than one three-month summer break. Most year-round schools operate on a multi-track calendar, and group students in three or four tracks with different vacation times. While one group is on vacation, another track is using the building.
Many people automatically disagree with the idea of year round schooling. It sounds daunting and like there would be way too much work. However, this is not necessarily true. Year round schooling would still give the same amount of time off as getting the summer off, except the breaks would be divided into shorter 2 to 4 week breaks throughout the school year. There are more advantages as well, some of which we will now look over.
First of all, the year-round schedule doesn’t add any more school days than the traditional school calendar, it just distributes vacation time more evenly and frequently. Likewise, if your school ends up adapting year-round schooling, breaks will become shorter but you still get the same amount of days on vacation overall. After summer break, teachers can