In 1450 through 1700 poverty was an issue. Almost half of the population in Europe were living at a subsistence level. For living in economically depressed war, poverty became extremely prominent. Almost all of the population in some regions had been susceptible to starvation. For perception of assisting the poor, religious and lower classes comes to play in advocating for helping the poor. Middle classes and merchants saw the poor as lazy and carefree, and major leaders viewed them as unworthy of assistants.
Throughout this time of poverty religious leaders have always advocated for helping the poor. In this time frame, there was no difference, all religious member wouldn't turn away the poor. A Catholic priest’s sermon said that if you give
…show more content…
the poor a penny in good healthy for god it’s worth more pennies after his or her death (Doc 1). The priests, in Europe really did believe that giving to the poor is of the most value because Catholics did not believe in materialism. Helping those who need it in the step which brings you closer to salvation. Vincent de Paul, a Catholic priest, founded a religious order that ministered to the poor. He also spoke about the importance of educating people to help the poor, he said what enabled bishops to become saints was their alms-giving to the poor (Doc 10). Vincent de Paul believed in helping the poor because as the sermon said it brings you closer to salvation. These people are reliable sources because they work for God, they have no reason to lie about how good things come out of helping the poor. De Paul has said that giving homes to the poor is just as valuable as giving money(Doc 10). This is a response to how the church feels about the poverty in Europe. Middle classes and wealthier groups were undecided on the matter.
For some, they’re sympathy or disgust for the poor depended on how willing a poor a person looked to find work or fix their situation. In the town council meeting in France, they stated how poor people don’t work but when they do they are lazy (Doc 5). They had decided that if the poor didn’t look willing for a job, they would be expelled from the city. Yet, if they looked willing but were unable to find a good sturdy job, they would be treated more respectfully. One thing they did not know was that they might need the lower class they expelled. This town council might be a bit too strict and be well absorbed in the thought of money. William Turner, an English doctor, wrote about his medicine practice. He also wrote about how, beggars would come to ask for alms, but wouldn’t accept his offer to heal them (Doc 6). He was an educated man in works that had steady finances. His opinion does not mean the law of why the poor class did not want to fix their situation. As a response, they decided to have a poorhouse. This Poorhouse regulation in Suffolk County said that for all rogues that enter will have 12 stripes to the bare skin on their back, for the young rogue and the idle loiter will receive 6 stripes in the same manner (Doc 7). This poor did not want to help the poor, or at least they thought they were helping. In reality, they were beating them to be
submissive. The Cardinal Richelieu, a royal councilor has mentioned how the sick are doomed, we are unable to help them, while the poor and starved can be helped and all that can help should (Doc 8). In Juan Luis Vives, a Spanish humanist said that if you help others will do the same naturally. They will follow in nature because humans want to solve problems (Doc 3). These two sources have the similar message just like document one and nine have. This picture has a man that is only helping for the good of God. A family that seems to be in need is at his door and this man is only peeking out of his door to give the alms (Doc 9). Emperor Charles V mentioned that people that do not help the poor will not receive salvation, as those who bring helpfulness to the less fortunate (Doc 4) unlike Jean Maillefer a wealthy merchant. He claims that the non-wealthy have an easy life they do not have a pinch of stress as the wealthy do (Doc 11). As a merchant who has a lot of finance does not understand the poor. Finally, the majority of the wealthy they talked of them as being lazy and detrimental to their countries. Poverty happens throughout time and space but do people feel and respond in the same way? Humans are different, they always have a bad ad good side for different topics. Poverty had both sides as seen throughout different sources.
As the Reconstruction Era ended, the United States became the up and coming world power. The Spanish-American war was in full swing, and the First World War was well on its way. As a result of the open-door policy, England, Germany, France, Russia, and eventually Japan experienced rapid industrial growth; the United States decided to pursue a foreign policy because of both self- interest and idealism. According to the documents, Economic self- interest, rather than idealism was more significant in driving American foreign policy from 1895 to 1920 because the United States wanted to protect their foreign trade, property and their access to recourses. While the documents also show that Nationalistic thought (idealism) was also crucial in driving American foreign policy, economic Self- interest prevailed.
In today’s society many countries and even citizens of the United States question the U.S. government’s decision to get in involved in nuclear warfare. These people deemed it unnecessary and state that the U.S. is a hypocrite that preaches peace, but causes destruction and death. Before and during World War II the U.S. was presented with a difficult decision on whether or not to develop and use the atomic bomb.
I bet it wouldn't take much effort for me to identify a time in my life when I was cruel towards people who were poor; critically judging them. Especially not knowing what their situation was. They could have had family or financial problems, maybe their house just burnt down. It could have been a number of things but any way you look at it, it was wrong.
To conclude, three sets of views existed in the 15th, 16th, and 17th Centuries regarding the destitute. In the 1400's, the poor were treated with sympathy and charity. In the next century, the poor were regarded with suspicion and hatred, which occasionally led to abuse. By the 17th Century, charity had resumed through private citizens and religious orders, though the wealthy still regarded the idle poor as worthless and undeserving of aid. These three often-conflicting sets of views had a profound effect on the lives of the European poor: they determined how the destitute were treated and socially regarded.
East Asia from 1450-1750, including China, Japan, and Ming China, used many different strategies for empire and state building including taking voyages around the world to get ideas for their empire, having a good educational system and a strong, powerful government, including women in schooling and political events, having different views on religious freedoms and having a tough military.
The Dark ages is the time between the 500’s and 1400’s. The Dark ages was a time of civil wars, Death, diseases, invasions and thief. There was a lot of invasions and to protect them self from that communities made a code call The code of Chivalry as (Doc 5) states “Europe in the Middle Ages was a dangerous place. Invasions from Muslims, Mongols, Vikings, and other tribal groups were common. War between lords was also common. The value of protection and warriors created a social code called Chivalry. Knights fought for lords and ladies, and lived by a gentleman- warrior code of Chivalry.” And other big thing in The Dark Ages was Diseases. Diseases in the dark ages was deadly because there was not antidote and even Doctors were scared of
The institution of slavery, from the year 1830 to 1860, created a divide between the northern and southern regions of the United States. Southerners, who relied on slaves to maintain their plantations, supported the institution, as it was a major part of their economy. Meanwhile, northerners, many of whom depended on slave produced cotton for textile mills and goods for the shipping industry, were divided on the slave issue, as some saw it as a blessing while the abolitionists saw it as a horrific institution. Overall, attitudes toward the institution of slavery, due to a variety of causes, differed in the varying regions in the United States from 1830 to 1860.
Throughout Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, nations were filled with poor and less fortunate individuals. While the nobles of countries such as France and England ruled their lands, many forgot about the underprivileged that roamed the city streets begging for alms. As a result, the opinions towards these lower class people were very differentiated. However, three main opinions stood out. All in all, the views of the poor in fifteenth – eighteenth century Europe included those who believed individuals should help the poor because it is the right thing to do, those who believed individuals should help the poor for God, and those who believed the poor were just idlers
Although poverty has minimized, it is still significant poverty which is characterized by a numerous amount of things. There are two types of poverty case and insular. “Case poverty is the farm family with the junk-filled yard and the dirty children playing in the bare dirt” (Galbraith 236)Case poverty is not irretraceable and usually caused if someone in the household experiences “ mental deficiency, bad health, inability to adapt to the discipline of industrial life, uncontrollable procreation, alcohol, some educational handicap unrelated to community shortcomings” (Galbraith 236).Case poverty is often blamed on the people for their shortcomings but on some levels can be to pinpoint one person's shortcomings that caused this poverty. Most modern poverty is insular and is caused by things people in this community cannot control. “The most important characteristic of insular poverty is forces, common to all members of the community, that restrain or prevent participation in economic life and increase rates of return.
In the novel Poor People, written by William T. Vollmann asks random individuals if they believe they are poor and why some people are poor and others rich. With the help of native guides and translators, and in some cases their family members, they describe what they feel. He depicts people residing in poverty with individual interviews from all over earth. Vollmann’s story narrates their own individual lives, the situations that surround them, and their personal responses to his questions. The responses to his questions range from religious beliefs that the individual who is poor is paying for their past sins from a previous life and to the rational answer that they cannot work. The way these individuals live their life while being in poverty
The Impact of Legislation on the Problem of Poverty in the Sixteenth Century The legislation for poverty in the sixteenth century was affected by a concoction of factors. The most prominent ones being, the conducting of the legislation, the changes in belief, and attitude of the people and the economy. The impact of the legislation is so difficult to measure as there were a number of local schemes, which emerged at the same time. The evidence from this period suggests that the local schemes were like customised versions of the national schemes, some carrying out little of the national legislation. The way in which they adapted the laws was found to have consequences on their effectiveness.
It is hard for me to understand that some people have to live in poverty, and small run down houses without running water and such. When I read this quote I could just imagine a little girl sitting up looking at the nun in her tattered clothes and saying..yes this is where I live. I can just imagine her feeling like she is nothing compared to others.
Since I spoke about rich people, I should talk about poor people. I feel compassion, admiration, and generous when it comes to poor people. I feel they have a rough life but always tend to put on a smile and look happy. I always want to be kind and friendly to poor people and make them feel like they have a friend who will help and support them if needed. I think poor people are kind and generous. I previously said that rich people are stingy about their money, but poor people are the exact opposite. Even though they lack mone...
John Barton remarks on the rich knowing “nothing of the trials of the poor” (I). He continues, adding a religious dimension, “we pile up their fortunes with the sweat of our brows, and yet we are to live as separate as if we were in two worlds; ay as Dives and Lazarus”
One of the most basic teachings in the Catholic Church is to ?Love one another as I have loved you.? This can be implied towards people living in poverty as we can follow the steps that Jesus had undertaken to love other people even if they are your enemies. By showing love and compassion we can create a world that is aware of poverty issues and help the declination of poverty. Countless organisations are heavily involved in carrying missions to help ultimately eradicate poverty. These charities and organisations include CARITAS, World Vision, Oxfam, St Vincent de Paul and many other non profitable organisations which help carry out work to help those who are in need.