Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of working in partnership
Why is it important to work in partnership
Advantages and disadvantages of working in partnership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In relation own experience in adult and/or children’s services in health and social care settings this section explains the philosophy of working in partnership. There has been promotion of integrated health and social care services within national policy, which can be achieved through partnerships/ inter- agency teams. Dickinson (2006) and Coxon ((2005) concur with the earlier statement and point out that in recent years, the concept of partnership and collaborative working have come to the fore within the UK and other European countries. Partnerships have been core to the way New Labour envisioned modern health and social services. Working in partnership means working together across the different sections, or divide resulting in better outcomes for service users (Dickinson, 2006) . The practice of working in partnership takes place in various ways for example; there can be partnerships in integrated care whereby service sectors such as health and social care work together. It can also take place between professionals for example, nurses, social workers and doctors and between settings, that is, within hospital and community, primary and secondary care (Petch, 2012). Partnership can also take place between types of care for example in acute and long term (Coxon, 2005). There is evidence that suggests that working in partnership improves inter-professional understanding and relations (Pickard 2008) and access to services for service users is enhanced (Brown et al. 2002). When professionals work in partnership it brings about a range of benefits such as economy, efficiency and effectiveness. There are a range of benefits accrued to the service user such as enhanced quality of care in terms of support in out of clinical areas... ... middle of paper ... ...and through their education and qualification they are ranked to be of higher status (Wistow and Hardy, 1991). For example, doctors have higher status and power over nurses. However, such a power difference may be allowed in hospital because the doctors make most decisions concerning patient care which the nurse acts upon. Conversely, if a doctor were to work in collaboration with social workers they may still perceive themselves to have higher power and status. The inferiority of status imposed then becomes a problem of working in partnerships. For partnerships to work, each professional and staff within it has to be treated with mutual respect and all services seen as vital to patient/ service user. Also, poor understanding of the aims of a partnership and poor attention to the development of skills of all people involved are a barrier to effective partnerships.
...10) K101 An introduction to health and social care, Unit 4, 'Developing Care Relationships', Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Using examples involving human service workers, discuss how interprofessional practice is defined. Discuss the barriers to interprofessional practice and how these might be addressed. Interprofessional practice is essentially the collaboration of multi-disciplinary professionals to achieve a common client-centred goal and in doing so, better assist with the complexity of the clients’ challenges (Chenoweth & McAuliffe, 2015, McCallin, 2014). Whilst the ability to work in partnership with other professionals is essential in creating the best outcomes for a wide variety of client care (Pecukonis, Doyle, & Bliss, 2008), social workers face a range of boundaries that may limit their ability to work coherently, including miscommunication, lack
rofessionals from different disciplines collaborating to provide care to patients. Effectively coordinated and collaborative inter-professional teams are essential to the care and treatment of patients (Rowlands & Callen, 2013; Doyle, 2008; Ruhstaller, Roe, Thürlimann & Nicoll, 2006; Simpson & Patton, 2012, p. 300). Communication is a process of conferring information between individuals through use of speech, writing or various other means, and is critical to the success of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) (Higgs, McAllister & Sefton, 2012, p. 5; Rowlands & Callen, 2013; Sargeant, Loney & Murphy, 2008). An MDT must use multiple strategies to enhance communication and ensure their success (Doyle, 2008). An effective MDT generates opportunities that benefit healthcare, which is the reason for the recent dominance of inter-professional care in health practice (Simpson & Patton, 2012, p. 300; Rowlands & Callen, 2013). Many barriers prevent effective communication within inter-professional teams. Lack of communication within MDTs presents challenges to their success, leading to numerous consequences, including the failure of the MDT (London Deanery, 2012; Sargeant et al, 2008). Communication between professionals is the key factor underpinning the potential success or failure of inter-professional teams, the outcome of the functioning of MDTs will either benefit or impair care of patients.
This assignment will give a reflective account of two main communication skills that are important for relationship-based practice in social work. Relationship based practice is important in social work, this establishes a positive relationship with professionals and service users. In agreement of Carl Rogers (2012) and Threvithick (2012) it is vital to establish relationship based practice because it demonstrates social workers are trustworthy and dependable, this will enable the service users feel more confident to disclose information, be more open rather than distrustful and taking all the support in consideration rather than being wary. Relationship based practice supports unpretentious approach with service users and carries out progressive
Interagency working is where different professionals use their skills to work together in order to reach a common goal and vision (Ovretviet et al, 1997). This is desirable because it provides a higher quality service, and a holistic approach towards helping children and families. In addition, interagency working leads to resources being used more effectively (Hallet and Birchall, 1992). Yet, despite this, agencies often fail to collaborate with one another, leading to inadequate service provisions and serious implications for service users. This essay will first look at the reasons behind key failures of interagency working in social work practice, by reviewing some serious case examples in child protection, and will discuss how these challenges can be grappled with.
Service user involvement and participation has become a standard principle in guiding social care planning in order to improve in the developing and delivery of service to meet diverse and complex needs in a more effective way. Key pieces of legislation states plainly that service users through a partnership approach should be enabled to have voice on how the services they are using should be delivered (Letchfield, 2009). The Scottish Executive (2006a:32) helpfully state ‘Increasing personalisation of services is both an unavoidable and desirable direction of travel for social work services. Unavoidable in the sense that both the population and policy expect it; desirable in the extent to which it builds upon the capacity of individuals to find their own solutions and to self-care, rather than creating dependence on services’
One of the five key principles of care practice is to ‘Support people in having a voice and being heard,’ (K101, Unit 4, p.183). The key principles are linked to the National Occupational Standards for ‘Health and Social Care’. They are a means of establishing and maintaining good care practice. Relationships based on trust and respect should be developed between care receivers and care givers, thus promoting confidence whilst discussing personal matters without fear of reprisal and discrimination.
This definition provides a goal for teams to strive for and outlines the important outcomes of high quality interprofessional collaboration. Highlighted in this definition is the need for participation and on-going collaboration and communication among caregivers who are focused on provision of seamless care. According to the WHO Study Group on Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice, (2008), collaboration is “an active and on-going partnership, often between people from diverse backgrounds, who work together
Intro- Collaboration with the interdisciplinary team plays a big part in the care of a patient.
Social workers in the healthcare field can be very beneficial to an interdisciplinary team. Throughout the semester we have looked at how social workers bring their professional and distinct skill set and beliefs to these teams. There are many stereotypes and biases surrounding social workers and other professionals on interdisciplinary teams. Social workers also have different views than other healthcare professionals and use their skills in communication to help the clients they serve, along with various other skills that are unique to social workers differing from other professional in the healthcare field. A social worker’s skill set can be extremely useful when working with specific populations at risk. The relationship between health and the role of the social worker can be different from other social worker roles in different fields. However, it is clear that social workers and interdisciplinary teams can be beneficial for everyone.
The practice of using inter-professional teams in delivering care is not a new concept but current health policy requires professionals work within a multidisciplinary team Department of Health (2001) and entrenched in the Nursing and Midwifery Council (2008) Code. The principle focus of this essay is to discuss the importance of inter-professional collaboration in delivering effective health care and what challenges and constraints exist. The integration of a case study will give an insight into inter-professional collaboration in practice.
Because interprofessional teams meet and discuss the goals of the patient, it improves the care of the patients by increasing the coordination of services. There is a more efficient use of time when all the team members are on the same page and want to meet the same goal. Additionally, interprofessional team care will highly benefit patients as professionals can gather the services or resources that apply to the patient for a better quality care. Social workers make a great addition to an interprofessional health care team because social workers can help patients feel empowered when it comes to decisions made as a
Davis, C; Finlay, L; & Bullman, A. (2000) ‘Changing Practice in Health and Social Care, London: Open University Press
Social work is a multifaceted, ever adapting profession, which has had many purposes and identities through the years. It is imperative for the vocation to constantly evolve alongside the social climate and the new ways in which we identify and treat those who are in need of support. Social workers can be required to take on the role of counsellor, advocate, case-worker, partner, assessor of risk and need, and at times (as the government seeks to push social work further and further towards the health and education sectors) a servant of the state. The profession is dramatically subject to affection by societal change, thus demanding social workers have a duty to be up to date with the latest developments in understanding how and why people get to the point of requiring social work intervention, and how best to prevent and cater for it.
Glouberman & Mintzberg (2007) discusses the traditional roles within the health sector by separating them into four quadrants – care, control, community and cure. Although they work collectively for the wellbeing of patients, the roles discussed in the report also have individual focuse...