Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plot summary of The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell
Gender role stereotypes in literature
Negative effects of stereotypes on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Revenge: Anyone Can Turn Insane in Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”
“You get treated in life the way you teach people to treat you” Wayne W. Dyer. This is relevant in “The Most Dangerous Game” because what it essentially means is what goes around comes around, which happened in the story. General Zaroff treated Rainsford badly, which resulted in Rainsford doing the same. “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a adventure story about a hunter Rainsford, who becomes in the care of another hunter, General Zaroff, after being stranded on “Ship-Trap Island”. It’s revealed that Zaroff wasn’t “fascinated” by hunting animals anymore, instead he began hunting humans. “The Most Dangerous Game” is a story about the fight for life or death.
In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” implies that well mannered people can turn insane if their life depends on surviving through characterization.
…show more content…
Connell conveys Rainsford as an individual who is turning savage in order to survive to show how humans can act if their life depends on staying alive.
While Rainsford is trying to lose General Zaroff, he reveals qualities of a person having a rush for the will of fear to survive. Connell writes “he had plunged along, spurred by the sharp rowels of something very panic like”(Connell 28). Connell highlights Rainsfords conversion on becoming deranged with “plunged along” and “something very panic like”. While Rainsford could've chose to stay tranquill, he let his temper get the better of him. Connell includes “something very panic like” to further draw attention to how Rainsford had been driven mad. Connell emphasizes on Rainsford slowly turning savage to ensure people may become uncivilized if their life depended on
it. Gradually, the idea of surviving becomes more and more important to Rainsford throughout the story, as he becomes more and more insane. While Rainsford appeared at General Zaroff's house, he revealed traits of a truly mad person. He is not smiling has a livid demeanor towards General Zaroff. Connell writes “Rainsford did not smile. “I am still a beast at bay”, he said in a low, hoarse voice, “get ready General Zaroff””(Connell 34). Connell further highlights how an individual can become insane with “Rainsford did not smile”. This reveals that Rainsford wanted revenge for General Zaroff attempting to kill him. “I am still a beast at bay” implies that Rainsford knew that he’d become mad. Connell stresses on Rainsford’s insane character to ensure that anyone can turn demented it depended on surviving. In Richard Connell’s, “The Most Dangerous Game” he implies that sane people can turn uncivilized if their life depends on it, through characterization. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game,” General Zaroff creates an game to kill humans, including Rainsford. Throughout the story, Rainsford had become more and more absurd the more he tried to survive. In the end Connell revealed how insane a person can actually be, by beating General Zaroff at his own game.
Within the article Stephen King continuously states that we humans all have insanity within us. In the article,
In the story The Most Dangerous Game a character named General Zaroff has a passion for hunting. He has been hunting since he was born. He has hunted every animal known to man, but, then he gets tried of hunting the same animal over and over. So he discovers a new animal human flesh. General Zaroff is person of bad character because he is cruel, cowardly, and untrustworthy.
Through the use of insanity as a metaphor, William Shakespeare, Edgar Allen Poe, William Blake, and Charlotte Perkins Gilman, introduced us to characters and stories that illustrate the path to insanity from the creation of a weakened psychological state that renders the victim susceptible to bouts of madness, the internalization of stimuli that has permeated the human psyche resulting in the chasm between rational and irrational thought, and the consequences of the effects of the psychological stress of external stimuli demonstrated through the actions of their characters.
He uses his prior knowledge to attempt to outwit his opponent. He tries a plethora of tactics in order to survive. Finally, he comes to a solution. “Twenty feet below him the sea rumbled and hissed. Rainsford hesitated. He heard the hounds. Then he leapt far out into the see…” (Connell 80). It is Rainsford’s superior judgment that allows him to swim back to Zaroff’s house and hide in the bedroom curtains. Eventually, Rainsford succeeds in his fight for survival. “I see,” he said. “Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford….” (Connell 80). At last, Rainsford wins. “He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided,” (Connell 80). Had Rainsford not thought deeply about his actions, he could be dead. It is Rainsford’s true courage and wits that allow him to withstand the worst and live in the
The most effective protagonist due to characterization out of several titles analyzed; would be Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game”, by Richard Connell. This can be illustrated as he has the strength of being quick-witted,brave, and is a man of moral standing. The concept of Rainsford being intelligent especially holds its truth as if this were to be false he would not have survived his multiple encounters with General Zaroff. Throughout the course of the story, the experienced hunter can be seen creating his own concoctions of traps, and even heads as far to cover his tracks - leading Zaroff into the wrong path. Therefore, this is even further conveyed in which the General allows the witted antagonist to live for another day as a result of serving a challenge to him. Moreover, several instances in
Humans have ruled planet Earth, as well as the animal kingdom for millions of years; in our wake we ravaged and have selfishly grasped the planet’s resources without remorse for the dwelling inhabitants. We have as well, turned on ourselves with our diversity and religious influences; this only led to more bloodshed and anguish among ourselves as well as anything and everyone in our path. The short stories “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, and “The Sniper” by Liam O'Flaherty have both shown empirical evidence pertaining my perspective connecting the universal theme; good and evil. Therefore, I strongly believe that humans are primarily evil and contain the most devastating greed on the face of the Earth.
"Get ready, General Zaroff.". This type of statement is that which is unlike pre-game Rainsford would have said, he has become more animalistic in the way he acts. In the beginning he is, in every way opposed to this “game”. Trying to bring reason into Zaroffs strange mind, so he avoids this situation entirely. To no surprise however, he fails. Rainsford is then thrust into this life and death mode, everything he does will determine his fate directly. Having to use every ounce of ingenuity he can muster in order to save his life. That mindshift is what changed the way Rainsford thinks and acts. The amount of adrenaline that would have been pumping through his body is absurd. And after days of several close encounters and adrenaline highs, he most likely would have felt a wish for another adrenaline rush. Seeing the only way to reach that high is to become involved with Zaroffs game, he leaves the reader in awe with his statement “I am still a beast at
He needs to keep himself calm, when his conscious is telling him otherwise. Rainsford kept telling himself: “‘I must keep my nerve. I must keep my nerve.’” (11) He was being hunted down, and it put a lot of stress on him, so he had to stay calm and not lose his nerve. He does a great job of it, and it works in his favor. He stays calm and is able to function properly. Rainsford also needs to make himself realize that animals actually do feel fear. He needs to do this so he can work like an animal does. After being hunted himself, he realizes that animals do get very scared. Rainsford especially needs to make himself block out all his fear. He needs to keep a clear mind so he can think better and so he can make proper choices. He overcomes his fear and beats
trying to convey, which is that just about anyone can be driven into madness and that the narrator in this story is not very different from any other person.
Cases feature such extreme examples as stalking ex-boyfriends and close friends who have disrupted intimate relationships through telling lies about infidelity. In these cases, the reader can identify with the person telling the story, placing himself or herself in the teller’s position and identifying with the extreme emotions involved and, perhaps, the desire to murder. It is this feature that then most effectively supports Buss’s argument about normality and evolutionary function and permits connection with the reader in his text. Though the statistics and other evidence show some compelling support, the link to Buss’s claims is not always as clear as it is in the personal accounts, which do seem to support the idea of mentally healthy people being those who most often murder, as opposed to the severely mentally
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, a man whose name is Sanger Rainsford faces a disagreement which is based on what he thinks about a deserted island. This island was totally unpopulated except the one man who lives there, General Zaroff. General Zaroff loves to hunt but he hunts not only animals but human beings. Actually, General Zaroff got tired of hunting just animals as he claims that it was too easy for him since he was such an excellent hunter. He wanted more than that and wanted to make the hunting a challenge. Rainsford comes to know that General Zaroff has hunted humans before, therefore he is a murderer. A critic has reviewed, “Ironically, General Zaroff’s belief in his invincibility weakens him and causes his defeat.” I agree with this critic several reasons.
This is shown by the multiple times the man calls himself a genius, often having a distorted perception of insanity. Repeatedly, the man says that he is not moronic, which is the clearly false converse of the statement:”If you are at the mental age under 10(in other words, idiotic), then you are insane.” What our protagonist has done is he has taken the inverse, or rather reciprocal, the converse of the conditional if put into mathematical terms. “If you are insane, then your mental age is under 10.” It is clear that the man has deemed this converse to be true, thinking that insanity can only be represented by the keen aspects of one’s knowledge, unable to grasp at the truth, making excuses thinking that a lie can become a truth. “Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded --with what caution --with what foresight --with what dissimulation I went to work!”(Poe, 1843). Thus, shows how he has only a fragmented view of the standard person, or rather put it, unable to perceive the limits and extents to distinguish the fine line of sanity and insanity. Although this may be the case, the man clearly stated how he planned and executed his premeditated act, as evidence for a death sentence. Nevertheless, it is clear that he has shown actions of narcissism and hallucinations caused by
In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the main character, Hamlet, is often perceived by the other characters in the play as being mentally unbalanced because he acts in ways that drive them to think he is mad. Hamlet may very well be psychotic; however, there are times when he “feigns insanity” in order to unearth the truth surrounding his father's death. This plan seems to be going well until Hamlet's mental state slowly begins to deteriorate. What began as an act of insanity or antic disposition transitions from an act to a tragic reality. After studying Hamlet's actions, one will notice that as the play progresses, his feigned insanity becomes less and less intentional and devolves into true mental illness.
In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, insanity is defined as an illness or disease that sends the mind into sheer madness. This “disease” deprives the mind of reason and awareness, creating a human being of complete disorder. “A common notion of insanity is that those laboring under it are very violent or very suicidal or talking nonsense” (Kellogg). Kellogg states the actions of those affected by insanity; he provides clear knowledge of behavior associated with an individual that has been introduced to madness.
While Sanger Rainsford is being chased by General Zaroff, he begins to feel the terror of being hunted. Connell writes: