The Most Dangerous Game Rainsford Character Analysis

444 Words1 Page

The most effective protagonist due to characterization out of several titles analyzed; would be Rainsford from “The Most Dangerous Game”, by Richard Connell. This can be illustrated as he has the strength of being quick-witted,brave, and is a man of moral standing. The concept of Rainsford being intelligent especially holds its truth as if this were to be false he would not have survived his multiple encounters with General Zaroff. Throughout the course of the story, the experienced hunter can be seen creating his own concoctions of traps, and even heads as far to cover his tracks - leading Zaroff into the wrong path. Therefore, this is even further conveyed in which the General allows the witted antagonist to live for another day as a result of serving a challenge to him. Moreover, several instances in …show more content…

A following idea that is widely portrayed within the story is that Rainsford is brave. This is further illustrated as over the course of his interactions with Zaroff - where one might easily panic and cause unease leading to them giving into their feelings of panic- he never seems to do so. In fact, Rainsford manages to be for the most part calm and collected; at least for his situation. This mentality, which can be considered to be bravery, allows him to survive his encounters with the General. As a result, Rainsford conveys himself as a figure of bravery due to the fact that he remains collected while encountering the enemy where a normal man may have given up and into his panic. Another characteristic that Rainsford aids in having strength in, is the moral code he demonstrates a while finding that the General kills men for the amusement of it solely - to escape his boredom for the time being. In the event in which he realizes this, he responds with disgust and refuses to hunt others with

Open Document