Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“‘I’ll wager you’ll forget your notions when you go hunting with me. You’ve a genuine new thrill in store for you Mr. Rainsford.’
‘Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer’” (Connell, 70). Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, portrays a hunter, one who feels no pity for the ones he hunts, who is suddenly in their shoes. He becomes the huntee when he meets a psychopathic murderer, and declines to hunt with him. However, he will not be let off the hook that easily. He gets three days to hide from his hunter, and if he’s discovered, he loses the “game”. It’s a game of cat and mouse, where at times the hunter will be underneath his prey, but with a gun in the hunter’s hand, the prey can’t retaliate. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell uses setting, characterization, and conflict in order to convey an anxious, haunting mood.
…show more content…
Initially, Richard Connell uses setting to establish that the mood of the story is anxious and haunting when we follow Sanger Rainsford as he begins his journey on Ship-Trap Island.
When Rainsford first encountered the château, “His eyes made out the shadowy outlines of a palatial château; it was set on a high bluff, and on three sides of it cliffs dived down to where the sea licked greedy lips in the shadows” (Connell, 64). The description of the hungry lips causes a sense of anxiety because it feels like it could engulf you suddenly and erase your existence permanently. Furthermore, the details of where the château is located gives off the effect that the château could possibly be a haunted house; and something evil could be lurking inside, causing the mood to become haunting and
anxious. Secondly, Connell uses characterization to disclose the mood of the story when we were introduced to Zaroff. When he meets Zaroff, “Rainsford’s first impression was that the man was singularly handsome; his second was that there was an original, almost bizarre quality about the general’s face” (Connell, 66). General Zaroff produces an anxious and haunted feel because there is an unknown, and bizarre factor to him that is unrecognizable. Lastly, the mood of “The Most Dangerous Game” is revealed using conflict, when we are stuck in Rainsford’s despair as a man was approaching his safe spot. “It was General Zaroff. He made his way along with his eyes fixed in the utmost concentration on the ground before him. He paused almost beneath the tree, dropped to his knees, and studied the ground” (Connell, 76). The waiting and suspense gives you anxiety about whether or not Zaroff is going to discover and shoot Rainsford. It gives off a haunting, terrifying feel knowing Zaroff is so close to his prey, our protagonist; the one we’re rooting for. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell uses setting, characterization, and conflict in order to create an anxious, haunting mood. So in the situation of hunter and prey; which side do you fall onto?
Both “Full Circle” and “The Most Dangerous Game” have many differences with how the murder is presented in the story, but both also have many similarities. In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” the murder was done for fun and sport, General Zaroff killed his victims to fulfill a hunting sensation. But in the short story “Full Circle”, the murder was done out of jealousy, because the Terry was rejected. Throughout my paper I hope to show the similarities and differences of the murder cases within the two stories.
Where does the line of sport and murder intersect in hunting? Is it when the species being hunted is able to reason? Or is it when the species being hunted looks just like the hunter? In both movie and film, we see a man fight for his life and another going against all codes of ethics. While Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Ernest B. Schoedsack’s film adaptation both have several similarities, the difference are also apparent in each respective media.
In the short story “The Hunter” the author Richard Stark introduces Parker, the main character of this book. The main character is a rough man, he’s a criminal, a murderer, and even an escaped convict. He’s described as crude and rugged and though women are frightened by him, they want him. Parker is not the classic criminal, but rather he’s intelligent, hard, and cunning. In this story the author carefully appeals to his audience by making a loathsome criminal into a hero, or rather, an anti-hero. The author, Richard Stark uses ethical appeal to make his audience like Parker through the use of phronesis, arête, altruism and lastly the ethos of his audience.
For many people, hunting is just a sport, but for some it is a way of life. In Rick Bass’s “Why I Hunt” he explains how he got to where he lives now and what he thinks of the sport of hunting. There are many things in the essay that I could not agree more with, and others that I strongly disagree. Overall this essay provides a clear depiction of what goes through the mind of a hunter in the battle of wits between them and the animal.
A skilled hunter sprints desperately through the woods, realizing the futility of hiding from his greatest foe: his own kind. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is the story of a hunter that becomes the hunted. The story explores the sense of extreme terror the protagonist feels being pursued by a psychopath living on a mysterious island. This protagonist, Rainsford, has many traits that aid him in his battle with the general. By demonstrating his cunning, sly, and remorseful traits, Rainsford shows the story’s theme of “walking a mile in someone else’s shoes”.
In the beginning of the story, Rainsford has a conversation with his friend, Whitney, about hunting animals. Rainford does not care about the animals that he hunts. He believes hunting is only a sport to kill innocent creatures. “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels?’” (1) Showing the reader exactly what he thinks of hunting. Rainsford does not understand that the animals he hunts are like the people that Zaroff hunts. They are innocent, and he is murdering them when he hunts them. Rainsford thinks that Zaroff is insane for murdering people, but Rainsford is also a murderer. When Zaroff hunts Rainsford, the protagonist realizes the terror and pain the jaguars must have felt when he hunted them. Now the roles are reversed, and Rainsford is the one being hunted. “The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse. The general was saving him for another day’s sport! Then it was that Rainsford knew the full meaning of terror.” (17) Rainsford has changed his feelings about hunting animals now, and he has become a better person. He now takes into account how his prey feels. His interactions with people will also be different, because instead of being extremely overconfident, he realizes that he is not perfectly adept at hunting, and everyone has feelings that matter. In conclusion, Rainsford is now more humble and less overconfident than he was when he began his
Lyga, Barry. I Hunt Killers. 1st ed. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2013. Print.
As a member and supporter of the earth’s weak little peacekeepers (small humans with loud voices), I can say that despite Rick Bass’s honorable honesty, I found “Why I Hunt: A Predator’s Mediation” to be a threat to womankind. Not all women are vulnerable, but with weapons the hunter can make most anyone his prey. There are predators in the United States who hunt women the way Bass hunts elk. If Bass’s non-human targets are replaced with women and children, the essay has quite a different effect on the reader, though the arguments don’t change. When Bass describes his love of “sitting in some leaves, completely hidden and motionless—waiting, and waiting” (63), I picture him waiting in a park for an unattended child or an unaccompanied woman. My concerns about Bass’s instincts aren’t neurotic. I’m a loving woman who occasionally hugs trees and wants to feel safe in the world—not a card carrying member of PITA.
The general's eyes had left the ground and were traveling inch by inch up the tree. Rainsford froze there, every muscle tensed for a spring. But the sharp eyes of the hunter stopped before they reached the limb where Rainsford lay; a smile spread over his brown face. This story is filled with the same type of fear Connell experienced in his life. Perhaps he felt 'hunted' at one point in his life and decided he had to run away from all the pain and anger. For instance, his father may have been abusive to him, so he decided to run away from the fear of being emotionally as well as physically hurt[ADM5]. Rainsford slid down the tree and struck off again into the woods... Following the trail with the sureness of a bloodhound came General Zaroff. Connell ran and ran and ran, but no matter how far he ran, his fears were always behind him. Connell would soon figure out what to do.
“The Most Dangerous Game” offers a clever play on words, with “game” carrying two different meanings. The first being the animals and humans hunted, and the second being the competition aspect between Zaroff and Rainsford. The title advocates hunting other people is the most dangerous game, and people themselves are the most dangerous prey to hunt.
To Mr. Rainsford, hunting is like football to a NFL player. Hunting plays a huge role in his li...
When I hear the word hunting I think of a man in the woods shooting animal, but I've never thought of a man hunting a man. In the story "The Most Dangerous Game", Rainsford is washed up on a mysterious island. He sees nothing but a dark house, so he goes up to the door and immediately is welcomed in by a man named Zaroff. They're having a good dinner until Zaroff explains that he's a hunter. He is not like most hunters though. He hunts humans. As soon as Rainsford realizes this, he wants to get out the island, but it won't be that easy. Zaroff makes Rainsford hide in the woods, if he can make it three days without being hunted he can leave. In the movie we watched, called "high Noon", a murder named Frank Miller is coming to town to get revenge. Frank Miller is back to kill the main character Will Kane. In both stories the men are alone and must fight for their life.
Thesis: Although someone can seem normal in every way they may unexpectantly come at you with a dark side. Through compare and contrast “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Child by Tiger” we will see the darker side of human nature.
Have you ever thought a certain way to later have that thought process changed? In The Most Dangerous Game written by Richard Connell was original published in 1924 and won the respected O. Henry Memorial Award in both 1923 and 1924 which goes to show that this story is well worth reading. Although this story integrates literary fiction, it is classified as a commercial fiction because it is merely for entertainment. This story has a lot of suspense and mystery behind it and will keep the reader entertained throughout its entirety.
Judith Wright's poem `The Killer' explores the relationship between Humans and Nature, and provides an insight into the primitive instincts which characterize both the speaker and the subject. These aspects of the poem find expression in the irony of the title and are also underlined by the various technical devices employed by the poet.