High Noon And The Most Dangerous Game Comparison

560 Words2 Pages

When I hear the word hunting I think of a man in the woods shooting animal, but I've never thought of a man hunting a man. In the story "The Most Dangerous Game", Rainsford is washed up on a mysterious island. He sees nothing but a dark house, so he goes up to the door and immediately is welcomed in by a man named Zaroff. They're having a good dinner until Zaroff explains that he's a hunter. He is not like most hunters though. He hunts humans. As soon as Rainsford realizes this, he wants to get out the island, but it won't be that easy. Zaroff makes Rainsford hide in the woods, if he can make it three days without being hunted he can leave. In the movie we watched, called "high Noon", a murder named Frank Miller is coming to town to get revenge. Frank Miller is back to kill the main character Will Kane. In both stories the men are alone and must fight for their life. …show more content…

In both stories the main characters are isolated. In the The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford is completely alone on Shiptrap Island and he must stay alive on an island he is unfamiliar with for three days. "Bleak darkness was blocking out the sea and the jungle" (Connell 215). This quotes shows that Rainsford was alone and isolated, and had to use his instincts to fight and defeat General Zaroff. In High Noon the setting is the same, Will Kane is left alone to fight four men. Will Kane is completely abandoned by everyone in his town. "Street from Kane's point of view. It is completely deserted" (Foreman 326). This quotes shows that Will Kane is left in a deserted town to fight for his life against Frank Miller. In both stories the men have to defeat the bad guys in completely isolated

Open Document