Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis
The help literary analysis
Two kinds of literary analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
After reading “The legend of Sleepy Hollow”, “Rappaccini's Daughter”, and “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” and comparing them to their movies, the reader will find that the authors and producers had much to compare. There are several different literary components to compare and contrast between the texts and the movies. Three literary components that were most obvious to compare and contrast were plot, character, and setting. These three components had many similarities and differences between the text and the movie for each story.
One literary component that was comparable between the texts and the movies was plot. In most of the stories that were analyzed, the plots were not the same in both the movie and the text. For example, in “The
…show more content…
Legend of Sleepy Hollow” the rumor that went around the town was that the horseman’s head was taken off by a cannonball (Irving 17). However, in the movie, the horseman’s head was taken off by a sword (S.H. dir. The legend of Sleepy Hollow). The producer most likely made this change to the plot in the movie because the movie came out way after the story was written. During the time period in which the movie was made, swords were much more commonly used than cannons. Another change to the plot that was made by the producer of “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” is that at the end of the text Ichabod Crane is attacked by a horseman and goes missing. In the movie, Ichabod Crane is chased by a horseman that ends up being fake, and he continues on with his normal life. The probable reason that the producer made this change was so more events could take place after Ichabod Crane was attacked by the horseman and the movie would last longer. Also, in the text Ichabod Crane disappears and Brom Bones marries Katrina, whereas in the movie Katrina moves to New York with Ichabod Crane. The plot is also changed several times in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”. In the text, as Giovanni is looking through his window he notices that the lizard and butterfly die when they are touched by the moisture from the purple plant (Hawthorne 66). However, in the movie, Giovanni never sees either one of them die so he does not know that the purple plant is poisonous (D.M. dir. Rappaccini’s Daughter). The producer most likely made this change to create a more mysterious atmosphere in the movie. Another change to the plot that was made in “ Rappaccini’s Daughter” is that in the text the maids were not introduced until further on into the story, but in the movie the maids were introduced right away. Also, in the text several people had seen Beatrice before, however, in the book Beatrice has never been seen by anyone. When Beatrice dies, Giovanni and Rappaccini start to argue in the text unlike the movie where they both say nothing to each other when she dies. Another example of the plot being changed between the text and the movie is in “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall”. In the text, granny lays in bed the entire time (Porter 698). In contrast, granny was very active in the movie (R.H. dir. The Jilting of Granny Weatherall). The producer probably did this to make the movie more entertaining and more comprehensible. another example from “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” where the plot was changed is that in the text the entire story occurs over one day, but in the movie the entire story occurs over two days. Another literary component that was comparable between the texts and the movies was character.
For example, in “The legend of Sleepy Hollow”, Ichabod Crane believes in supernatural occurrences in the text (Irving 17), but in the movie he does not believe in supernatural occurrences, but instead believes strictly in science (S.H. dir. The legend of Sleepy Hollow). Most likely, the reason the producer made this change is because most of the time when supernatural occurrences happen in a movie it seems so unrealistic that the audience loses interest. One similarity between The Legend of Sleepy Hollow text and movie is that the characters that were used were the same in both. However, in the text, Ichabod Crane is a strict school teacher. In contrast, the movie characterizes Ichabod Crane as a constable who goes to Sleepy Hollow to investigate murders. The characters are also changed between the text and the movie in “Rappaccini’s Daughter”. Throughout the entire text Giovanni’s feelings toward Beatrice's were expressed many times (Hawthorne 62-92). However, in the movie Giovanni’s feelings toward Beatrice were shown very few times (D.M. dir. Rappaccini’s Daughter). The reason the author most likely expressed Giovanni’s feelings more in the text was to keep the reader's attention and to allow the reader to put himself into the characters shoes. Another difference between the text and the movie is that at the end of the text, the author revealed that Bagaloni really just wanted to be a better scientist than Rappaccini, yet in the movie Bagaloni wants to help Beatrice escape and fall in love because of the garden. In “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall”, the characters were also changed between the text and the movie. In the text, Granny is a very passive person and is alot less controlling and demanding over people (Porter 698-703). In contrast, she was very controlling and bossy in the movie (R.H. dir. The Jilting of Granny Weatherall). The reason the producer made her
more controlling in the movie is most likely to portray what kind of person granny really was. Also, Galton was an added character into the movie and was not a character in the book. One similarity between the text and the movie is that the reason Haspy is granny’s favorite child is because of her hair in both the text and the movie. The last literary component that was comparable between the texts and the movie was the setting. In most of the stories that were analyzed, the setting was not the exact same in both the text and the movie. For example, in “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” Ichabod Crane lives in a place called Greensburg. It is a town that is very close to Sleepy Hollow but is not considered to be Sleepy Hollow(Irving 16). In the movie, Ichabod Crane actually lives in Sleepy Hollow (S.H. dir. The legend of Sleepy Hollow). The producer most likely slightly changed the setting so that the audience would be less confused as to whether or not Ichabod Crane was a resident of Sleepy Hollow. One similarity between the setting in the text and movie in “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” is that they are both set in the middle of nowhere surrounded by woods. This setting was most likely created to set a mysterious and fantasy like atmosphere. In “Rappaccini’s Daughter” the setting in the text and the movie were very similar though there were a few differences. In the text most of the story took place in Giovanni’s room and Rappaccini’s garden (Hawthorne 62-92). However, in the movie a lot of the scenes took place out on the streets, especially when Giovanni was conversing with Bagaloni (D.M. dir. Rappaccini’s Daughter). The producer most likely did this because in the movie Giovanni and Bagaloni talked to each other a lot more and the only place that would have made sense for them to both be would be in the streets. Bagaloni would have no reason to be in Giovanni’s room and Giovanni would have no reason to be at Bagaloni house, especially since he is not a scientist. The setting is also changed between the text and the movie in “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall”. In the text, the story was set in Granny’s bedroom almost the entire time (Porter 698-703). Granny stayed in bed and kept going in and out of sleeping. However, in the movie there were several different setting. The main ones were Granny’s porch, Granny’s kitchen, and Granny’s bedroom (R.H. dir. The Jilting of Granny Weatherall). The producer probably had the movie set in more than one place so there was more for the audience to see. If the entire movie was just set in Granny’s bedroom then the audience would lose interest. Also, the audience was able to better understand the plot of the story when the setting changed throughout the movie. After analyzing the literary components of both the movie and the texts for “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow”, “Rappaccini’s Daughter”, and “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” the reader will find several literary components to compare and contrast between the texts and the movies. In these contemporary and modern selections it is very easy to identify the similarities and differences between each story's text and movie. Plot, character, and setting were the three literary components that had the most obvious comparisons throughout each story. Often times producers will make small changes to the literary components from the text to make the movie more entertaining and enjoyable for the audience.
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
There are many differences and similarities in the short story of “A Sound of Thunder” and the movie.
Many novels are transcribed from their original texts to films. Some of the movies are similar to the original plots, others do not follow the authors work. Alice Hoffman’s novel Practical Magic is altered when it is made into a movie; and Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible which was also made into a movie, was extremely similar to his original writing. There are multiple variables that account for how a movie is made some of them include; the amount of income, how much can be changed, and the author’s approval. The two recreations previously mentioned, have two completely different outcomes, the results all depend on the amount of creative licensing the movie company has.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
Many evenings during the winter, Ichabod spent with the old Dutch wives. They would tell ghost stories as well as other super natural beings and demons while sitting by the fire. There was a certain story that was never left out, the legendary Headless Horseman, or sometimes known as the Hessian of the Hollow. The story went on that there was a soldier who with a cannon ball had gotten his head shot off and since roamed through Sleepy Hollow looking for his lost head while on his horse. The Headless Horseman has a jack-o-lantern that sits in replacement of his head. In addition, a love story is part of “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” however many find it to be more of a pure lust or greed story. There was girl named Katrina Van Tassel who was
There are many similarities presented to the audience between the movie and the novel. One
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Although at times it is easy to get carried away with the adventure of a story, noticing the elements a writer has put into his work is very important. In reading “Young Goodman Brown” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” you can see both similarities as well as differences of how both Nathaniel Hawthorne and Washington Irving chose to illuminate their romantic writing styles. The writers both use a mystical woodsy setting with supernatural twists to draw in readers. Underlying you will find the differing romantic themes each writer used, as well as how each writer chose to end their work.
What is better than “Sleepy Hollow” ? Here are some ideas about Sleepy Hollow. Its two men name Ichabod Crane and Brom Bones they both fell in love with a woman name Katrina. Ichabod and Brom have some ways that they are alike but they are different in many many many ways. Lets get into more details about “Sleepy Hollow.”
Adaptation of any kind has been a debate for many years. The debate on cinematic adaptations of literary works was for many years dominated by the questions of fidelity to the source and by the tendencies to prioritize the literary originals over their film versions (Whelehan, 2006). In the transference of a story from one form to another, there is the basic question of adherence to the source, of what can be lost (Stibetiu, 2001). There is also the question of what the filmmakers are being faithful to or is it the novel’s plot in every detail or the spirit of the original (Smith, 2016). These are only few query on the issue of fidelity in the film adaptation.