Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The great gatsby: film and novel comparison essay
The great gatsby novel vs film analysis
Criticism for change in the great gatsby
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The great gatsby: film and novel comparison essay
Maria Selgado
Ms.Tobias
English III GT- 4th
12 January 2017
The Great Comparison
Novels are very unique things to read. They contain so much detail and information it’s almost hard to comprehend. Sometimes these unique novels are translated into movies and while most movies disappoint the reader by not capturing the complete essence of the novel, I felt that The Great Gatsby did not disappoint. Sure, there are some differences between the two but not enough to make the movie a complete disappointment. In this essay, I will begin by comparing the two together, the two being the novel and movie, then I will gradually move in the contrast of this essay.
There are many similarities presented to the audience between the movie and the novel. One
…show more content…
comparison I found that was constant throughout the entirety of the movie and novel was the eyes of T.J. Eckleburg as a sign that “God sees everything” which is said by Wilson in both the movie and the book (Fitzgerald 167). By comparison to the movie and the book, Nick and Gatsby are portrayed beautifully, in my opinion. Gatsby obviously has an extraordinary life in the book and is seen throughout the movie in the many parties. You can also tell that his behavior in the movie and the book resonate very well through the way Nick describes Gatsby on pages 69-71. Just as the characters and the settings are similar from movie to book, so is the scene where Gatsby and Tom get into the argument at the Plaza (Fitzgerald 135-142). Almost every detail was right on the dot all the way to way Gatsby began to act excitedly once Tom accused him of bootlegging in the hotel (The Great Gatsby). Gatsby is seen frantically trying to talk to Daisy just as it was described in the book. As I’ve said before, there are differences but in my opinion, I do not think there are many.
Although most of the characters were portrayed the best that they could be, Daisy was not. In the book Daisy is said to have “The voice of money” (Fitzgerald 127). However, in the movie she talks more sweetly and not at all how I expected her to be played. In the novel, Gatsby’s father shows up to the funeral and shows Nick the journal that Gatsby had had when he was younger and talks about how proud he is of Gatsby but unlike the novel, the movie does not have this scene (Fitzgerald 180-182). However, the movie shows that no one came to Gatsby’s funeral except all the paparazzi that showed up to take pictures of him in his casket (The Great Gatsby). I feel this should have really been included because it showed a little more insight into the life of Jay Gatsby. The last and final difference I have about this comparison is about the scene where Daisy is going to visit Nick for tea. The book really did not include many details about how Nick’s house looked after Gatsby had sent everyone over to “get it ready” (Fitzgerald 89-90). When this scene occurred in the movie, I was really thrown off because of how decorated it was. Especially all the flowers that had been brought over to Nick’s house. It was filled to the brim with flowers which made the scene more awkward than it should have
been. This novel should have been a very difficult novel to translate into movie format but this was done beautifully. Because there were little differences between the movie and the book, I thought that the movie was better done only because of the way the book was written which was a great weakness for me. It was a little hard to read at times and the movie made it more bearable and understandable. A unique and new insight that came from comparing the movie and the book was just how much drama went on in the 1920’s. I knew that it was time for partying and having fun but this also showed the darkness that happens behind the curtains. One item I would change to improve the movie would be to include the scene with Gatsby’s father. I cannot stress that one enough. It would have made for a very good scene as well due to the rawness of the father being there for the funeral. Overall, The Great Gatsby was a great read, and a great watch. Works Cited Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner, 1992. Print. The Great Gatsby. Dr. Baz Lurhmann. Warner Bros. Pictures. 2013. Film
There are few similarities between the book and the movie. Usually most movies are similar to
F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel, “The Great Gatsby”, and Baz Luhrmann’s film, “The Great Gatsby”, both have similarities and contrasts between the two of them. The Great Gatsby is a novel and film taken place in the 1920s filled with wild parties, mysterious people, The American Dream, and most of all, love. There are several things that can be compared between the novel and film; such as the characters and the setting. There are also contrasts between the two as well; which is mainly involving the character Nick.
New Essays on The Great Gatsby. Ed. Matthew J. Bruccoli.
Imagine. You are sitting in complete silence, even the nearby crickets won't dare to let out even the slightest of croaks. You stare down at your cluttered, dimly lit desk. Your hand grasps your pen, and the other rubs back and forth across your temple in angst. Your eyes pass over each paper, containing each incomplete thought, and your mind floods with memories of your past. Trapped by writer’s block, you are all alone with only your experiences, surroundings, and philosophy aiding you in the fall that is the dark reality of alcoholism and depression. For renowned authors F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway, these influences all played a crucial role in identifying their style techniques, as well as determining similarities and differences
Gross, Dalton, and Maryjean Gross, eds. Understanding "The Great Gatsby": A Student Casebook to Issues,
For example, Leonardo Dicaprio’s character of Gatsby was focused on emotions. I enjoyed that Redford was very calm and cool about everything and the way he approached the character but, Dicaprio made such an open and outgoing character which made the movie more entertaining. DiCaprio captured Gatsby’s intensity and charm and brought out the crazy mood swings and took his character and the audience to a more emotional place. Both Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio had their own way of approaching the character and really selling Gatsby but Leonardo DiCaprios was better. Another reason I prefer the 2013 version of the 74’ is because of the bond and friendship Nick Carraway played by Tobey Maguire and Gatsby had MaGuire was able to bring a true and strong meaning to their friendship that made his and Gatsby’s bond feel organic and real and you were able to see that clearly unlike with Waterston where you just saw the friendship and didn’t feel any emotion. But I felt much more of a connection with his character than I did with the ’74 version. If you have read the book and seen the original film, then you understood where Nick was coming from in the scene where he was furious with Gatsby, after he believe he killed Myrtle only to find out that Gatsby wasn’t the one driving the car that killed Mrytle, MaGuire, did a fantastic job in showing his emotions and how what happened to Myrtle and the person that killed Myrtle affected him. I loved that Nick was a lot more real in this movie. He didn’t hold back and he gave the audience a reaction that anyone in life would have had if they were in his situation. Nick had the major issue of being dragged into situations because of people he knows. I thought Maguire did a great job of showing ...
An example is when Nick proves his non- judgemental attitude by not judging anyone in the movie. For example when Tom brings up the book about white supremacy he keeps his mouth shut, and his thoughts to himself even though he knows Tom is a fool. Just like the book he is a modest character with good morals and treats everyone with respect to a certain extent. Although in the film Nick isn’t as big as a narrator as in the book so it takes away from Fitzgeralds portrayal of Nick because it is not truly Fitzgerald speaking as Nick it is more Nick the character talking about his opinions. As for Gatsby he is exactly the same in the movie as he is in the book and clearly depicts what Fitzgerald envisions himself being.
Forward, S. (2013) The Great Gatsby; following the dream The English Review. Volume 24 No 2. Journal
This novel explains the differences of these two important settings of the great gatsby. In the
The Great Gatsby is a parody of itself. While Fitzgerald tries hard not to make Gatsby and especially Daisy laughable personalities, this is where he ultimately fails. There's not enough ironic distance to his characters. As Gatsby, at least in the eyes of many critics, should represent the idea of the American Dream, the presentation of his character puts the whole concept in question again, without being intended as criticism. This is mainly the fault of another weak character in the novel, Nick Carraway.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby demonstrates what Marie-Laure Ryan, H. Porter Abbott and David Herman state about what narratology should be. These theorists emphasize the importance of conflict, human experience, gaps and consciousness, among many other elements, in order for a story to be considered a narrative. The Great Gatsby shows these elements throughout the book in an essential way. This makes the reader become intrigued and desperate to know what will happen next. The Great Gatsby is unpredictable throughout the use of gaps, consciousness and conflict.
Although there was glamour in the party scene, it was highly impersonal. The characters in the movie seemed as if they were trying to hard to mimic the ones in the book. The characters in the movie didn't really bring their characters personalities to life. Though there is an exception to this, Leonardo DiCaprio did portray Jay Gatsby properly. The only problem with his character in the movie was that when he died no one shows respect come to the funeral, but in the book, his fathers comes and gives Nick some insight to the real James Gatz. The book was thoroughly quoted, but in times the quotes were cut and replaced with other translations of the actual line. That removed a lot of depth from certain quotes and
is Nick. In the novel Nick is a man who comes from a poor family who
In conclusion, Baz Luhrmann's version of the film adaptation to The Great Gatsby was in fact very successful and faithful to the novel. The casting was indeed almost perfect because most of the actors such as Toby Maguire (Nick Carraway), Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio), Carey Mulligan (Daisy Buchanan), Joel Edgerton (Tom Buchanan) and Jason Clarke (George Willson) all portrait their character wonderfully as described in the novel. The sceneries were great because it was very descriptive compared to the scenes in the novel. The use of Computer Generated Imagery technology was perfect because it highlighted the sceneries making it very vivid, realistic and pleasurable to the eye. The costuming used in the film was very creative, wonderful and perfect because it suited each of the characters class, personality, and it also suited the time period of the 1920s.
Movies can enhance the experience of a story, but they aren’t always completely accurate to the book. The movie, The Great Gatsby, by Baz Luhrmann, is a good representation of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel; however, there are quite a few differences between the two. Some differences include; the portrayal of the characters, the importance of symbolism, and events that were either added or taken out of the movie.