Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Filmmaking process
Wrinkle in time movie and book comparison
Visual Techniques in film
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Filmmaking process
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same. In the book A Wrinkle in Time the director, John kent Harrison, changes many scenes in this movie, but manages to stay true to the the main idea of the story. For example, there was a scene in the book where Calvn came over to the Murray's house. When he comes inside he wonders around the living room until he stops before a picture on the piano showing Meg's father with a group of men. On the other hand, in the movie Calvin is shown a series of pictures and videos of Meg’s father on a tv screen. Another example is when the Aunt Beasts communicate with humans. In the book the Aunt Beasts can not see, but they can feel the world through their emotions. They can only communicate through their tentacles, but in the movie version the Aunt Beasts were given a mouth to talk to Meg and the others. These changes may have occurred because the director wanted these scenes to be better understood. By giving the Beasts a mouth, it would help the readers understand what Meg …show more content…
For starters, the ending of the movie was very different from the book. Instead of Vera hanging herself and everyone ends up being dead like in the book, the director of the movie makes a plot twist to make the movie end with two survivors. Philip Lombard and Vera Claythorne are the two survivors who find out who the killer is. They are the only ones alive to escape. Another small change that occured was when some of the victims died for example, Emily Brent. Instead of expecting that everyone dies and there being no resolution, the director decided to make that change so that there could be hope for the
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Another example is when Chance watches television. In the book, the narrator explains that when Chance changes the channel, he feels like he is changing himself. As he changes the channel, he gets caught up in all the different images he sees. In the movie, all you see is a man watching television, which doesn't explain too much. In the movie, the only time we find out what Chance thinks of television is when he is talking to someone else.
A Wrinkle in time similarities and differences between them both the book and the movie
Should a film always follow how the storylines of a book goes on? It is not always necessarily required for it to occur. People normally read the novel before watching the film. After seeing both the movie and the book, one will start to compare the similarities and differences, all affected by the director’s choices. They will also notice the director’s choices that affect how the story goes out. Similarities, differences, and director’s choices impact and enhance the story in a novel and a film in many ways.
And then there were none the book and the movie were alright and the movie version of a wrinkle in time were ok but they did have differences. I mainly found small differences in A wrinkle in time and with that being said most of my differences are going to be small. And then there were none had some bigger differences. One of them really just said hey the movie ends this way and that is that. Then it skips over some stuff in a wrinkle in time.
Also within the book you get much more detail than what a movie could ever fit into it reasonably though leaving out intense scenes such as the knife fight between Rose Mary and Rex. The two often fought though some conflicts were left out or altered to fit the story line of the movie and not the book’s. Within the book reader engagement was higher with the knife scene though without being in the movie viewer’s captivity was
The second difference I found was Lily and Zach's relationship. In the book it seemed like they fell in love however in the movie it seemed like they were nothing but friends that worked for the Boatwright’s. I feel that the director did that to focus more on Lily trying to figure out if her mother had really been killed by her or if she just ran away like the first part of T. Ray’s story.
Isn’t it odd how Movies and books tend to differ from each other? Honestly, whether it be a scene added into the movie or another one completely left out (maybe due to time or the people who made the movie seeing the particular scene as not quite relevant to the plot.) Either way, i’ll be seeing to a particular book and the movie that came out because of it.
“Growing a Lady”, a look into the development of the female main characters in A Wrinkle in Time and The Secret Garden
Some of the small differences in the movie do not change the movie. How they call Ben-Hur number 41 on the galley ship in the movie and number 60 in the book is an example of a small difference. Another small difference is how Judah's house was not waxed when he got back in the movie. Either way, he still entered the house and finds Amrah/Esther there. One more small difference is that in the book, Judah knocks the tile down. In the movie Tirzah knocks the tile down. The tile still hits Gratus and Messala tells who the family
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie, hoping it will be exactly the same? Let me guess, you were probably disappointed. For my first quarter book report, I read and watched The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. I think the book was very detailed, interesting, and fun to read. However, I was unfortunately let down by this movie. The movie did not follow the storybook like I thought it would. Some of the characters had different names, and most importantly the events that happened in the book either were totally different in the movie, or did not happen at all. This movie did not follow the storyline of the book!
In the movie the story is told in chronological order, but in the book the events seem to happen almost randomly. The movie focuses on Henry’s point of view. His story starts whwn he travel...