Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare book and movie
Differences between a book and a movie
Compare book and movie
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare book and movie
Nakiayah Williams Mrs. Baldatti English
March 29, 2016
There are a lot of differences between Ben-Hur the movie and Ben-Hur: A Tale of Christ. The movie has more details than the book. Because there are so many details, the differences between the movie and the book are mostly from small details. Even though most of the differences are small details, there are still many big differences like change in characters, characters names changing, and the time that things happened. At the beginning of the movie, Judah and Messala are not nineteen and seventeen, but in the book they are. This is an example of how there are small details that are different in the movie. In the book, Amrah was a faithful slave who helped the family before and after they were separated. In the movie, Esther is the faithful slave who loves Judah and helps his family before and after they were separated. This is an example of
…show more content…
The book starts with Messala and Judah meeting when Messala returned. This is an example of a big difference that makes the story's plot more understandable in the movie. In the movie Mullach does not have a tongue. He is also said to be Simonides' legs. In the book Simonides only tells Mullach go follow Ben-Hur and befriend him. Mullach has a tongue and is not just known as Simonides' legs in the book. This is also a big difference because, in the book Mullach is the one that takes Judah to the circus.
Some of the small differences in the movie do not change the movie. How they call Ben-Hur number 41 on the galley ship in the movie and number 60 in the book is an example of a small difference. Another small difference is how Judah's house was not waxed when he got back in the movie. Either way, he still entered the house and finds Amrah/Esther there. One more small difference is that in the book, Judah knocks the tile down. In the movie Tirzah knocks the tile down. The tile still hits Gratus and Messala tells who the family
This is my view on the movie and book. I likes the movie better the book because the
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
There are many differences in the movie that were not in the book. In the movie there is a new character in the movie that was not in the book. This character was David Isay.
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
There are many differences between the book and the movie of The Giver. The first main difference was Asher and Fiona's Assignments. This was an important difference because when changing their assignments, they were able to help Jonas in the movie. The second main difference was a similarity between all receivers.
For all the differences the film had from the novel, it was basically the same story just told in a more cheerful way and was more about the Joad family. However, the differences did not take away from the film; they might have made the film even better. No matter how different the film was from the novel, they both have succeeded in their own respective fields and remain classics to this
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
However, both versions of Animal Farm, have the same storyline with a couple of differences here and there. The movie included most of the events in the book. Old Major's speech about the Rebellion, the mass murder of the “enemies” of Animal Farm, and the building and destruction of the windmill all took place in both the book and the movie.
Aaron, Hannah’s brother, was in the book, but not in the movie. Aaron was the one Hannah told stories to and she missed his blue eyes and him when she wasn’t there, if it weren’t for Aaron she might not have thought of things to do to entertain the girls but that also created her reputation as a storyteller so not everyone believed what she said. In the book Rivka was someone she met at the camp who was more experienced and helped them survive, but in the movie she was her cousin so she didn’t have much experience and went through a stage of depression from her mom dying and wasn’t that much help. Shmuel wasn’t her uncle in the movie, he has been just a character of the town they were from. Shmuel and Fayge actually got married in the movie, and Fayge didn’t die from jumping out to save Shmuel. They also skipped Hannah obtaining a tattoo by a guy whose daughter was also named Chaya but had died in the camps. In the movie they added a character, Hannah and him had feelings for each other, but he tried to run away even though she warned him it was a trap. There also was a woman who was pregnant in the movie, and had the baby in the camp, but their baby was found and the mother and the baby were killed, that’s also how Grace died. In the book Grace didn’t die in the camp, but lived afterwards in America, but in the book she died trying to save a woman and her
Even though they are alike, there are some differences like, in the movie they were neighbors and in the book they lived across the street. Also in the movie they played basketball at school and in the book they didn't.
Ben-Hur was transformed from bible scripture to a movie because it is the most read scripture in the Bible. The scripture tells the story of a man, Judah Ben-Hur, who trades his life as the prince of Jerusalem with the life of a slave. The story tells of his journeys and triumphs as a slave. The story starts with the five wise men as their journey to find Jesus. When they arrive in Bethlehem they come bearing gifts for the newborn king.
Other events are expanded a great deal more in the movies than in the book. Despite this, the setting of the movies is nearly identical to that of the books. An example of this is Thranduil’s hall, which is depicted as having a “bridge that led across the river to the king’s doors. The water flowed dark and swift and strong beneath; and at the far end were gates before the moth of a huge cave that ran into the side of a steep slope covered with trees” (Tolkien 155). The movie follows this description very closely. Similarly, the Shire, Rivendell, and the Lonely Mountain closely resemble what the book describes. This helps familiarize readers with the setting of Middle-Earth, and connects it to certain locations from The Lord of the Rings. On the other hand, the filmmakers have added multiple action scenes to the movies in order to attract an older audience who are fans of The Lord of the Rings. Among these is a chase scene near Rivendell and a duel between Azog and Thorin in the first Hobbit film. In The Hobbit the Desolation of Smaug, a fight scene involving the dwarves in barrels is added, along with another skirmish in Laketown. Also a battle between Smaug and the dwarves is present in the movie, but absent from the book. Events regarding the elves and Bard the Bowman are also largely prolonged in the movies. Lastly, the most important battle in the book is the battle of the five armies, which we only witness a small portion of it through Bilbo’s eyes as “a stone hurtling from above smote heavily on his helm, and he fell with a crash and knew no more.” (Tolkien 252). In the book Bilbo wakes up after the battle is over, but in the movie we get to witness the battle while Bilbo is unconscious. While the battle’s description is relatively brief in the book, The Hobbit the Battle of Five Armies, the final movie depicts it in greater detail. By showing the battle in great detail the motion