More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast between books and movies
Similarities and differences between movies and books
The differences between books and movies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast between books and movies
And then there were none the book and the movie were alright and the movie version of a wrinkle in time were ok but they did have differences. I mainly found small differences in A wrinkle in time and with that being said most of my differences are going to be small. And then there were none had some bigger differences. One of them really just said hey the movie ends this way and that is that. Then it skips over some stuff in a wrinkle in time. In a wrinkle in time it has smaller differences and these impacted a little bit. One is I don’t remember Mrs. murray having a short discussion with mrs.whatsit mrs.who and mrs. which, this is weird because it is at the end of the movie version. This made things different in the way that it isn’t this
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
In And Then There were there were lots of things that were different than Clue. One thing that was different than Clue is that And then there wasn't on an island. Also in And Then Were None the movie was made in two different periods of time than the clue. Also in And then the butler was killed. In and then there were none the characters had a British accent. In and then there were none the characters were also British.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
In the movie, they missed things or changed parts, but they also quoted the book quiet a lot and make the story more a like. Most of the most important parts were in the movie. They missed one of the camps that Corrie was sent to and the didn’t show much of the 100th year party of the watch shop besides a picture. I liked the book way more than the movie because the book had more detail and made you understand what that part of WWII was like more than the movie does. In the book Corrie is learning how to have more faith and trust in God more but in the movie, she had a lot of faith the whole time and she didn’t struggle with that as much. I enjoyed reading about that because it made me feel like I’m not the only one that struggles.
And Then There Were None is a successful book written by Agatha Christie. It has sold over 100 million copies since its release in 1939. The And Then There Were None series has been adapted 25 times for film/tv and they have even made a video game based on it. And Then There Were None is a locked door mystery about ten criminals who are invited to a island and are slowly killed off one by one, based on a nursery rhyme. The first of the adaptations was a movie made in 1945, directed and produced by René Clair. There are some significant changes between the book and the movie. The movie failed to capture the dark mood of the book. The happy ending, people being innocent, the dry humor and romance really ruined the movie for fans.
According to the Internet Movie Database's exhaustive records, Louisa May Alcott's novel "Little Women" has seen itself recreated in four TV series, four made for TV movies and five feature length movies since 1918. The most recent version appeared in 1994 and features Winona Ryder, Claire Danes, Kirsten Dunst, Samantha Mathis, Eric Stoltz, Susan Sarandon, and Gabriel Byrne. As a long time fan of the novel, who has happily carted her large leather bound gold-gilded unabridged edition whenever she has moved, I find that I was disappointed in this newest movie version. As a movie lover, however, I found the movie to be an enjoyable experience.
For a long time, when anyone thought of a war movie, they immediately thought of Darryl F. Zanuck’s, The Longest Day. Cornelius Ryan, who was the author of the book by the same name, and happened to be a D-day veteran himself, wrote the movie. The book meticulously recreates the events preceding and during the invasion. It is filled with detailed descriptions of multiple occurrences during the invasion. It explains everything from mass attacks on beaches and towns to humorous anecdotes. The book wasn’t exactly a story involving characters, and neither was the film. The Longest Day is more a story of tragedy, glory, and courage surrounding one very important day. And even though mainly American and English filmmakers produced the movie, the movie and book both portray the Germans fairly. But the film added so much to the story that the book could not. Without some of the stunning visuals that the five (Zanuck went unaccredited, but was said to have directed over half the movie) directors put in the film, it would have been impossible to comprehend the scale of it all.
The film Big Eyes, is based on the true events of Margaret Keane, a painter, whose paintings of children with oversized eyes were falsely sold as her husband’s, Walter Keane.
The name of the book is Unbroken: A World War II Story of Survival, Resilience, and Redemption. Unbroken was written by Laura Hillenbrand about the Olympic athlete and war veteran Louie Zamperini. Unbroken the novel was released in 2010. The movie is called Unbroken and it was directed by Angelina Jolie. Louie Zamperini was played by actor Jack O'Connell. The movie Unbroken was released in 2014. The main prominent characters in Unbroken are Louie, Phil, and The Bird. Although most of the things that happen in the book happen in the movie, there are a few differences that slightly change the story. The book was received better than the movie because the movie had quite a few differences from Louie’s true story.
Madeleine L'Engle a French author uses a creative mixture of science and fairy tale magic for building the story line in her book A Wrinkle in Time. From beginning to end Meg, Charles Wallace, and Calvin go through adventure after adventure bursting with animated fairy-tale characteristics. This book has a model preteen coming-of-age theme. The three are intertwined naturally, and work well within the science-fiction twist of this very unbelievable fantasy tale.
I think that the book Wrinkle in time mostly fits the genre of fantasy. In the book A Wrinkle in Time the character Meg Murphy is a very smart child who is trying to find her father because he has been gone for a long time. Meg murphy goes on a journey to find her father and discovers herself meeting Ms.Who, Ms.Whatsit, and Ms.Which. On her way to finding her father she encounters many different ways of traveling and new things. For example she saw this beautiful transformation by ms. whatsit as she became a centaur. I saw this in the reading when Meg had seen Ms.Whatsit turn into a centaur in Chapter 3, page 73. “She was a marble white body with powerful flanks, something like a horse but at the same time completely unlike a horse.” This means that In this evidence it
The book A Wrinkle In Time is better than the movie because of the plot. One example of how the book’s plot is better is when the Calvin, Meg and Charles Wallace were transported to Camazotz. On page 115 it says, “Then, all at once, they saw the same thing, and stopped to watch. In front of one of the houses stood a little boy with a ball, and he was bouncing it.
In the movie productions of And Then There Were None and A Wrinkle in Time, the directors did not follow the original storyline. The changes made in the films caused a great impact on the story. In both films, the introduction and finale were different compared to the book. The two movies also strayed away from sequence and details. All of which made the directors of the films depart from the original plot.
The book A Wrinkle In Time is better than the movie because of the plot. One example of how the book’s plot is better is when the Calvin, Meg and Charles Wallace were transported to Camazotz. On page 115 it says, “Then, all at once, they saw the same thing, and stopped to watch. In front of one of the houses stood a little boy with a ball, and he was bouncing it. But he bounced it rather badly and with no particular rhythm,