Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about virtue ethics
Understanding virtue ethics
Understanding virtue ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about virtue ethics
In After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre maintains that the lack of virtues such as truthfulness, justice, courage, and relevant intellectual virtues corrupts moral traditions as well as institutions and practices. These derive their life from the traditions of which they are the contemporary embodiments. However in order to recognize this one must also recognize that MacIntyre wrote that “the existence of an additional virtue, one whose importance is perhaps most obvious when it is least present, the virtue of having an accurate sense of traditions to which one belongs or which confront me. This virtue is not to be compared and or confused with any form of conservative antiquarianism” (MacIntyre, 223). The purpose of this essay is to explain the …show more content…
Traditionalism is the upholding or maintenance of tradition, especially to resist change. The theory of traditionalism is a theory that all moral and religious truth comes from divine revelation passed on through traditions. In regards to morality, there are principles that concern the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. It is a particular system of values and principles that create a foundation for a code of conduct, especially one held by a specified person or community. So in regards to moral tradition it means that principles that concern the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior comes from revelation that has been passes on through traditions. When an individual lives in a moral tradition, they base their morality on the traditions that have been established in particular community. According to MacIntyre however, he believes that a moral tradition should become more based on Aristotelian virtue ethics. Modern virtue ethics gets its inspiration from the understanting of Aristotelian view of virtue and character. In order to achieve this goal according to MacIntyre, one must uphold an Aristotelian character which is primarily about a state of being. For example, the virtue of kindness deals with the correct arrangements of inner states and emotion …show more content…
MacIntyre acknowledges historical accounts of virtue and analyzes how they have become incompatible with theories of virtue and he concludes that these contrasting views are attributable to various practices that create differing conceptions of virtues and the virtues that are behind moral traditions. MacIntyre has argued for a radical change in the way that morality is viewed in regards to tradition. Whether it is a call for change the emphasis obligations, there is a return to a general comprehension of ethics or a tradition that unifies the practices that generate virtues. In the views of MacIntyre, he believes that if an individual follows tradition, then are achieving moral progress. Since MacIntyre upholds the view of an Aristotelian, if an individual upholds tradition in virtue ethics they are making moral progress. To be a virtuous person, one must fulfill the tasks of a virtuous person. It is important to acknowledge that a moral character particularly one who upholds a living moral tradition develops over a period of time. People are born with different natural tendencies; some may be positive tendencies such as friendliness and some may be negative tendencies such as jealousy. These tendencies are and can be encouraged and grow or thwart because of the influences an individual may exposed to when growing up. There are factors that play a vital role in this
The value attributed to the first virtue, wisdom, whose essence lay in “the perception of truth and with ingenuity,” concerns the comprehension of the nature of justice (7). In fact, Cicero asserts, within the public sphere, “unless learning is accompanied by the virtue that consists...
Conventionalism is the only view of ethical relativism that grounds morality in the group or culture. Pojman states that conventionalists focus on the morality of their own culture, and do not need to concentrate on the culture of others. For example, a young individual in the United States who was raised in a certain religion, and chooses to have premarital sex. In the eyes of their religion they are wrong for their decision, but in the open-minded attitude of the U.
On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com. ———. "
In today’s society, scholars often question a liberal arts education, not realizing the knowledge, wisdom, or virtue it could provide. The path to virtue is through a lifestyle in which harmony is achieved by the guidance of Divine Will or the Law of Nature. The effects of virtue, as stated in Seneca’s “Liberal and Vocational Studies” are represented by temperance, loyalty, and bravery. Seneca does not believe that the study of liberal studies can lead to virtue; only intrinsic factors, prompted by Divine Will and the Law of Nature, can achieve this goal.
Klagge, JC 1989, Virtue: Aristotle or Kant? Virginia Tech Department of Philosophy, Web version accessed 14 May 2014.
An Analysis of Matt Ridley’s The Origins of Virtue. Inwardly examining his own nature, man would prefer to see himself as a virtuously courageous being designed in the image of a divine supernatural force. Not to say that the true nature of man is a complete beast, he does possess, like many other creatures, admirable traits. As author Matt Ridley examines the nature of man in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the selfish and altruistic sides of man are explored.
Virtue ethics is a moral theory that was first developed by Aristotle. It suggests that humans are able to train their characters to acquire and exhibit particular virtues. As the individual has trained themselves to develop these virtues, in any given situation they are able to know the right thing to do. If everybody in society is able to do the same and develop these virtues, then a perfect community has been reached. In this essay, I shall argue that Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unsuccessful moral theory. Firstly, I shall analyse Aristotelian virtue ethics. I shall then consider various objections to Aristotle’s theory and evaluate his position by examining possible responses to these criticisms. I shall then conclude, showing why Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unpractical and thus an unsuccessful moral theory in reality.
Hursthouse, R. (2003, July 18). Virtue Ethics. Stanford University. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue
Virtue is a word that is often associated with having the highest honor and integrity. Everyone has a slightly different definition of virtue. I would like to examine: how has the definition of virtue changed throughout the years? I will analyze Nichomachean Ethics, by Aristotle, and The Prince, by Machiavelli. Aristotle wrote Nichomachean Ethics around 350 BC, while The Prince was written in the early 1500’s. With a nearly 2,000 year time period between these two great works, how has the idea of virtue changed?
In After Virtue, author Alasdair MacIntyre critiques the state of modern morality and proposes an argument in favor of Aristotelian virtue ethics. For MacIntyre, he believes that a lack of community driven morality is the cause of moral decline in society, and that this decline began during the age of Enlightenment. He explains that the Enlightenment brought society into a state of disruption because the intense focus on individualism drove people to philosophical emotivism. Emotivism is defined by MacIntyre as being “the doctrine that all evaluative judgements and more specifically all moral judgements are nothing but expressions of preference, expressions of attitude or feeling, insofar as they are moral or evaluative in character” (11). Emotivism (like relativism) leads to a subjective form or morality, which MacIntyre’s thesis explains to be deeply flawed. MacIntyre favors virtue ethics because he believes it to bring about a more objective moral value system.
Is virtue all we need? Virtue epistemology is the theory that all of the things we believe are done so through an ethical process. They play an important role, in that our own personal experiences and intellectual facets are what drive this process. The fundamental idea of virtue epistemology is that knowledge is a form of a more general phenomenon, namely success through abilities. Which is turn means: knowledge is a cognitive achievement through cognitive abilities (perception, memory, experience, etc.). Knowledge doesn’t need to be anything beyond a justified true belief.
Virtue theory is the best ethical theory because it emphasizes the morality of an individual in which their act is upon pure goodness and presents as a model to motivate others. Aristotle was a classical proponent of virtue theory who illustrates the development habitual acts out of moral goodness. Plato renders a brief list of cardinal virtues consisting of wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. This ethical theory prominently contradicts and links to other theories that personifies the ideal being. However, virtue theorists differ from their own expression of these qualities yet it sets a tone that reflects on the desire to express kindness toward others.
Both Kantian and virtue ethicists have differing views about what it takes to be a good person. Kantian ethicists believe that being a good person is strictly a matter of them having a “good will.” On the other hand, virtue ethicists believe that being a good person is a matter of having a good character, or being naturally inclined to do the right thing. Both sides provide valid arguments as to what is the most important when it comes to determining what a person good. My purpose in writing this paper is to distinguish between Kantian ethics and virtue ethics, and to then, show which theory is most accurate.
Thus, when virtues involves in some personal pain, the idea of purpose or need become very important as it deeply depends on self-control. Self-control becomes extremely important when virtues entails stepping out from person’s comfort zone, here you can distinct a virtuous person from others. A virtuous person can control himself and abide to rules and morals whatsoever, while people with no self-control but claiming being virtuous might forget their morals and values in some situations. In conclusion, I argue that there is a connection between virtues and happiness, however I have showed some situations that virtues may lead to unhappiness or confusion.
For the purposes of this essay human virtue is defined as a trait or ability such that one who has that trait or ability would be considered excellent and thus virtuous by human standards. Additionally it is important to keep