Understanding Cultural Sensitivity in Emerging Markets Leadership

1018 Words3 Pages

Cultural sensitivity, need to be considered in formulating an effective leadership style in the case of emerging markets. Cultural Sensitivity is western cross-cultural academia is a frequently used word. Simply put, to make their views and opinions culturally sensitive, and must be talking about the similar phenomenon of free hugs (free hugs) to realize the same behavior under different culture background have a different understanding. Occasionally saw the discussion about free hugs, I think the controversy on this phenomenon the reason lies in introducing free hugs people in carrying forward the spirit of love care of at the same time, then forgotten its Cultural background and environment. The different culture caused many details of …show more content…

Egalitarianism and Empowering were recommended more strongly in western cultures but less so in Asian and similar cultures. However, servant leadership dimensions of Empathy and Humility more strongly endorsed in Asian cultures than Western cultures. Such a leader by example, willing to become a servant to serve to lead; Its leadership is also the result of the to extend its service function. Servant leaders encourage cooperation, trust, seer, listening as well as the power of moral purpose. Servant leadership is not necessarily formal leadership positions. The advantage of servant leadership: the first is the servant leadership is a long-term work, the way of life evolution, it can stimulate positive changes within the community. The second one is Servant Leadership often compared with Transformational Leadership. The latter also attaches great importance to the collaboration. When both are shown to be the leader of grave concern, servant leadership more highlight its service characteristics, and the aspirations of transformational leadership are the leader in the service of organizational goals. Center of gravity in the organization for leadership is lead employees; this is the watershed of transformational leadership and servant leadership. However, the limitations of servant leadership: the first …show more content…

Is one type of leadership superior to the other one in the Chinese culture?” To answer these questions, a model puts forward a model to illustrate trust and harmonious mediation effect of the relationship between leadership style and its effectiveness, and explain the relationship between the adjustment force generated paternalistic and transformational leadership trust and harmony. Transformational leadership is beyond the cause of the exchange, through the development of staff, mental incentives to encourage the staff to group goals, tasks, and prospects for development and the interests of the superego, achieve the desired performance goals. And focus on longer-term goals, emphasizing on the development of vision, encourage employees to play to the innovation ability, and change and adjust the organization system, to create a good atmosphere to achieve the expected goal. To guide employees to not only the development of others, and take more responsibility for its evolution. Transformational leadership can create excitement in the organization, have a powerful influence and impact. Can also help people find the value of work and life with excitement. But if the goal and value systems, in contrast to the civilized society the basic principles, will pose a significant threat to society. Transformational leadership theory relates each leader and subordinate role, and try to

Open Document