Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employee Rewards and Recognition
Challenges in employee retention
Employee Rewards and Recognition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Employee Rewards and Recognition
Retention: Employee retention is a practice in which the employees are convinced to stay in the organization for the most period of time or until the accomplishment of the plan. There is no scarcity of opportunities for a capable person. There are countless organizations, which are looking for such employees. If individuals are not satisfied by the job they are doing, they might switch over to some other more appropriate job. In today’s upbringing it turns out to be very imperative for organizations to retain their employees (Dibble, 2000). Employee retention is supportive for the organization with that of the employee. Employees today are diverse. They are not the ones who don’t have first-rate opportunities in hand. As soon as they dissatisfy with the current organization or the job, they switch over to the next job. It is the duty of the organization to keep their paramount employees (Phillips and Connell, 2003). Employee retention concerns taking measures to convince employees to remain with the organization for the most period of time. Today employees’ retention has become the major issue for organizations. Hiring knowledgeable workers for the job is essential for an organization. However retention is even more crucial than hiring (Inkson, 2007). (Huselid, 1995) found that investments in HR activities such as incentive compensation, selective staffing techniques and employee participation resulted in lower turnover, greater output, and improved organizational performance through their impact on skills advancement and motivation. The prioritization of employees is important to competitive advantage and therefore business success has understood that specific notice has been given to the retention of highly skilled or except... ... middle of paper ... ...o Denisi and Arup Varma,2000 • Phillips and Connell, A. O. (2003), Managing Employee Retention: a strategic accountability approach. Amsterdam; Boston, MA; Alexandria, Va.: Butterworth-Heinemann. • Patricia K. Zingheim, Jay R. Schuster, and Marvin G. Dertien(2009) Compensation, Reward and Retention Practices in Fast-Growth Companies, Article published in WorldatWork Journal, Volume 18 No.2, pages 22-39 • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT BY ROBERT BACAL 1999 • Schuster, F. 1986. The Schuster Report. New York: John Wiley and Sons. • Schein, E.H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45, 109-119. • Singh, K., 2005. The effect of human resource practices on firm performance in India, Human Resources Development International, 6 (1): 101-116. • Wimbush, J. C., 2005. Spotlight on human resources management, Business Horizons, 48: 463-467.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2007). Managing Human Resources (5th
After reviewing Holland’s organizational strategy and exit interviews from the last seven years it is certain that through the new and effective compensation and benefits program created for Holland Enterprises, it will decrease the turnover rate, increase employee satisfaction and engagement and benefit the organization’s overall profits. Through careful consideration of pay structures, incentive awards, internal and external equities and the organizations benefits package Holland Enterprises new compensation benefits package will provide an effective and competitive compensation program. Henderson (2010) writes, “To survive and be successful in a global economy, an organization must be competitive. A major factor underlying organizational competitiveness is labor costs. Not only must an organization pay its workforce a competitive wage within its geographic region, but it also must vary the kinds and amounts of rewards offered, recognizing differences in individual contributions.” (p. 13)
Organizations’ other resources can be hired, retained and discarded at any time but human resources needs special treatment. It needs to be carefully hired, deserve an extra effort to retain it and requires training & development to upgrade and improve its capabilities. Other resources depreciate with the passage of time but when the human resource gains more and more experience, it becomes more beneficial for the organizations. These characteristics have brought human resources to be the central element for the success of an organization. (Mohammed, Bhatti, Jariko, and Zehri, 2013, pg. 129, para. 2)
Employee retention strategies help organizations. They provide effective employee communication to improve commitment and enhance workforce support for key organization initiatives. Retention strategies build customer loyalty by distinguishing and positioning an organization’s unique products and services in today’s crowded marketplace.
In my opinion, HR practices can make positive contributions to organisational performances, because except the unpredictable external environments, human resource management can improve the most factors that affect employees’ performances which finally influence organisational performances in long-term perspectives. This essay is aim to prove human resource practices can positively effect organisational performances based on literature discussion and empirical evidences. The next section briefly brings few negative views about the limitation of HRM related to improving organisational performances. The third section discuss the positive relationship between HR practices and organisational performances are established by applying HRM processes of hiring, selecting, placing employees as well as creating employment relationships within organisations. The final section is going to analyse an example company Mark & Spensers successfully utilised HR practices to improve their organisational performances and created competitive advantages.
A continued globalization of markets, hostile takeovers and rapidly advancing technology has made it very difficult for the organization to achieve competitive advantage. Employees are one of the most important determinants and leading factors that determine the success of an organization in this competitive environment. Every organization must address its employee needs in order to maintain a productive work force. In today’s fast paced society turnover rate of the employees is quite high and employees keep switching among different jobs. One of the reason behind this that employee may not feel any sense of association with the organization and that they may not feel a sense of shared goals with the organization (Ackoff, 1999). Managers are interested in maximizing their workers’ level of commitment, as the costs of hiring and training new employees are high. Generally, it is expected that employees are more likely to stay with their organization and be highly committed when they can see a strong linkage between the organization and their work. One crucial reason of high turnover of the employees may be that the employee may not feel committed to the organization. When employees are dissatisfied at work, they are less committed and will look for other opportunities to quit. If opportunities are unavailable, they may emotionally or mentally withdraw from the organization. Thus, organizational commitment is an important attitude in assessing employees’ intention to quit and the overall contribution of the employee to the organization (Naser Shirbagi, 2007).
McKeown, J. (2002) states that, “Effective retention begins before the hire- in tour recruitment literature, of course, but also in corporate and product literature, advertisements (for recruitment and for sales), press releases, product branding, company image, management reputation, and a myriad of other messages that your organization puts out into the marketplace about what it is, what it does, and how it does it.” (p.20). It is well known that in order for companies to gain that competitive edge they need to offer something that the other companies in their market are not offering in order to attract and retain top talent. The second way is by helping the company raise morale and job satisfaction. WorldatWork (2007) notes that according to a 2004 Overworked in America Study, that employees were less likely to feel overwhelmed if they had jobs that afforded them the chance to continue their education.
Employees desire compensation systems that they perceive as being fair and commensurate with their skills and expecta¬tions. Pay, therefore, is a major consideration in HRM because it provides employees with a tangible reward for their services. A significant interaction occurs between compensation management and the other functions of the HR program. For instance, in the recruitment of new em¬ployees, the rate of pay for jobs can increase or limit the supply of applicants. Compensation objectives should facilitate the effective utilization and manage¬ment of an organization’s human resources, while also contributing to the overall objectives of the organization (www.indiana.edu/~busx420/Book.../chap09.doc). Providing a first-rate benefits package for employees can be an important part of the recruitment and retention puzzle (studymode.com).
Employee compensation and reward systems have undergone a couple of paradigm shifts since inception. Reward systems were traditionally compensation based and focused on the individual or the position (Beam 1995). After a recession in the early 1980's, employers turned to performance based models in an attempt to save money while still rewarding top performers (Applebaum & Shapiro, 1992). Today, the most successful organizations are using a total reward model, a hybrid of the performance based model combined with strategic human resource management planning to create reward systems that both benefit the employee and help organizations realize their operational goals (Chen & Hsieh, 2006).
Almost thirty years ago more and more companies started looking at pay for performance to increase their bottom line and gain productivity. Slowly these general pay increases gave way to merit pay and other forms of monetary incentives. These types of monetary rewards can be grouped into two categories: individual and group incentive plans (Appelbaum and Shapiro, 1992). The literature suggests that merit raises are used the most as an individual incentive and profit sharing is widely used by organizations as a group incentive. Other individual and group incentives that are also commonly used are commissioned pay, bonuses, and stock options. The goal of most companies is to use these financial incentives to motivate workers and thereby boost productivity (Hassink and Koning, 2009). Monetary rewards definitely matter to most people. This is evident when a company reduces or even eliminates the financial incentives that they had in place because of the state of the economy. The consequences of this action are often very unpleasant, resulting in decreased employee motivation, increased turnover, and lessened productivity (Martin, 2010). However; the use of monetary rewards has both its advantages and disadvantages.
In large organisation, competition is not only in the market for goods and services but also for the quality of employees. As such, a large organization can only become attractive to the most skilled and high quality workers if it has an effective compensation and benefit plan. The key purpose of an effective compensation and benefit system is to provide employees with the right rewards for their work and right behavior in the workplace. Typically, organizational success is determined by the quality of employees an organization has. In turn, the organization can only attract such quality workers and maintain them through effective compensation and benefit
The purpose of this report is to brief the management on the importance of employee satisfaction in achieving the competitive goals of the organization through increasing the retention of the employees.
If you ask 5 different leaders what employee retentions is you may come ups with 5 different responses. Employee retention first began to appear in the 1970s and 1980s. Before that time the relationship between employer and employee was very simple. “You come work for me, do a good job, conditions allow, I will continue to employee you.” (McKeown, 2002, pg. 4). Simple right? The practice of employment before the 1970s was that you entered into the job market and remained with one employer for the duration of your career. As time changed so did the job market, in the 1970s and later, as job mobility and voluntary job changes began to increase, employers found themselves with a new phenomenon to consider: employee turnover (McKeown, 2002, pg. 5). Employee retention became a management tool to counteract the rise of employee
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart, and Patrick M. Wright. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010. Print.
Bersin, J. (2013, August 16). Employee Retention Now a Big Issue: Why the Tide has Turned | LinkedIn. Retrieved March 20, 2014, from