The Hunger Games Rhetorical Analysis Essay

709 Words2 Pages

The Hunger Games as a Psychoanalytic Theory
The Hunger Games at first, seems to be your average teen novel, but later is actually a story about a nation that requires young adults to kill each other for entertainment. During the story you wonder what the message the writer, Suzanne Collins, is trying to convey throughout the plot. The story is themed on corrupt politics, greed, and starvation. Is the message that she is trying to deliver tells us that if our economy and society continues what is doing now, that we may end up like Panem?
The country Panem is corrupt as is with its dictatorship government and politics. Panem is based on a social hierarchy ranking with the Capitol being the leader and districts one through twelve being ranked …show more content…

The reader must look deeper into story to find the message that Collins is trying to impose in the story. There are actually multiple messages that exist within the story. There is a political context that’s not apparent, but exists instating the idea the society of the Hunger Games is much like ours. The social message that lies within the story is about hunger but not only the literal meaning of hunger. Everyone in the society is fighting for hunger, hunger for increasing social hierarchy, political freedom, and actual hunger.
Hunting in the Hunger Games appears many times in the story. Katniss, is a hunter that spends most of her time hunting and uses what she can find or kill in the woods to feed her and her family. Hunting is what helped her survive during the Games when found couldn’t be found. Although hunting animals was “easy” for her and provided her food, hunting humans for competition is much different and took an emotional toll on her. These different types of hunting in the Hunger Games are the all same as viewed by the Capitol, but hunting to Katniss shifted from a positive thing to completely

Open Document