Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influences of religion on culture and society
Influences of religion on culture and society
Religious approaches to environmental ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influences of religion on culture and society
Christianity has and continues to be a force to be reckoned with. With a whopping 83 percent of Americans identifying as Christian, it is just to say that it is a very powerful and influential religion.(polls) The religion itself has been interpreted in a similar fashion since the medieval period and the most relevant interpretations are that of the beginning, the creation, the book of Genesis. It is the interpretation of Genesis that has determined and set in motion a main theme that says that humans were made to rule nature. Lynn White argues in The Historic Roots of Our Ecological Crisis that , "What people do about their ecology depends on what they think about themselves in relation to things around them. Human ecology is deeply conditioned …show more content…
“Eino’s ideal city was clearly anthropocentric and Elsa's was very ecocentric. Eino was a typical representative of the ‘Castle’ model while elsa represented the ‘Symbiosis’ model.” (Kjellberg, 271) Both are strong in their views and both views are quite the opposite. Kjellberg found that the reason for their very two different views was due to a different interpretation of the Creation. “Eino stressed in many ways the value of humans as being superior to that of nature...Elsa on the other hand stressed the importance of a community with nature as a whole. In this holistic view, according to her (Elsa), the human species has a special responsibility for ensuring the justice for all parties” (Kjellberg 272). Both these views caused very different opinions on economic life and sustainability as a direct result of their interpretation of the Creation. Eino looks at economic life as something that is there to “..improve human life conditions” and that is all.(Kjellberg 273) Elsa on the contrary believes that a view such as Einos, “...leads in the long run to the destruction of all human community…”(Kjellberg, 273). Elsa believes that a city should live with nature and have it made so both are balanced rather than one taking over the other. Elsa is not only …show more content…
Economics, defined by Grounding Religion, is “ The study of how people acquire and manage the materials they need to live” (Grounding Religion, 230) Economics although focused on people still has a big effect on nature especially when looking into things such as consumption, production and distribution of products. An important aspect of economics is being able to create sustainability between all those factors. Creating sustainable technologies with a recognition of what's best for both human and nature would be ideal. In Ecology: A Dialogue, Lisa Sideris comments, “Learning to live with natural limits ought to be seen as something joyful....We should consider the gains: reconnection to local communities and bioregions…”( Sideris,70). Sideris acknowledges that both parties would benefit from a new view. It’s because of this fact that a new interpretation of the Creation should be pushed and
The majority of this piece is dedicated to the author stating his opinion in regards to civilization expanding beyond its sustainable limits. The author makes it clear that he believes that humans have failed the natural environment and are in the process of eliminating all traces of wilderness from the planet. Nash points out facts that strengthen his argument, and quotes famous theologians on their similar views on environmental issues and policies. The combination of these facts and quotes validates the author’s opinion.
In the journal of Environmentalism as Religion, Paul H. Rubin discuss about how environmental is similar to religion. Rubin want everyone to know that the environment and religion are somehow similar in a way, which they both have belief system, creation stories and original sin.
The author of this book Steven Bouma-Prediger main argument is Christians need to live more earth-careful lives and being called to be caretakers is not optional. The responsibility to care for the earth is a part of our faith. Early in the book the authors takes you back to your first encounter with nature he does to make his topic relevant and personal to the reader. He then opposes his first question, how much do we actually know about where we live? He states that this question shows us how little we know about our trees, plants, flowers, and the patterns of the moon. This is also his first argument in which he said if we do not know our earth we are destine to use and abuse it. Understanding and caring about nature is necessary to live properly on this earth. Chapter 1 (page 21) “we are for what we love, we love only what we know, we truly know only what we experience.
...and nature is the main source of a guaranteed quality life. The Christians live(d) in cities or towns where the setting makes it important to behave well and have courtesies, as that is the more modern way of living, and therefore it is more logical to them to believe in a system which is more compatible to their lifestyle.
Be denying the importance of nature God’s creation Christians are participating in a form of blasphemy
In the essay "Worldviews in Conflict," Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcey compare and contrast the ideas of Christianity and the views of today's society. Throughout the essay they provide information about how the changes in society affect views regarding Christianity. Charles Colson and Nancy Pearcy's essay was written to contribute information so others could understand their views about the shifting cultural context and how it affects society's beliefs.
Throughout human history, religion has played a fundamental role in societal development, regardless of the culture. Christianity, in particular, has profoundly shaped the last two thousand years of history and continues to do so today. This holds true in the case of European development and exploration of the New World. As exploration in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries flourished, many countries set out to declare land on behalf of their country, and in an effort to bring honor to their God. When English settlers first developed colonies in New England, one of their goals was to share the word of God with the Native Americans they encountered. This drastically conflicted with the views of the Native Indians, and completely altered the development of North America. European religious views in early North American exploration set the tone for America’s development into a commodification driven society that exploited the environment as a means of economic potential.
An environmentalist is a person who worships the environment and cares for nature more than people. Christians and others share the common perception that environmental ethics exist for how human beings should relate to the land, the free market, and the environmental. Humans share a relationship with all creations of the earth. But as humans, they find themselves as having a role in the created order, which is they have a closer relationship with the creator who has charged them with acting responsible within his creation. Even allowing a common complaint of environmental activists is that Stewardship means that the earth was made exclusively because of human beings - that having dominion over nature is the same as having the power and authority of dominion.
In his essay, The Ethics of Respect for Nature, Paul Taylor presents his argument for a deontological, biocentric egalitarian attitude toward nature based on the conviction that all living things possess equal intrinsic value and are worthy of the same moral consideration. Taylor offers four main premises to support his position. (1) Humans are members of the “Earth’s community of life” in the same capacity that nonhuman members are. (2) All species exist as a “complex web of interconnected elements” which are dependent upon one another for their well-being. (3) Individual organisms are “teleological centers of life” which possess a good of their own and a unique way in which to pursue it. (4) The concept that humans are superior to other species is an unsupported anthropocentric bias.
Again, this section will give a working definition of the “urban question’. To fully compare the political economy and ecological perspectives a description of the “urban question” allows the reader to better understand the divergent schools of thought. For Social Science scholars, from a variety of disciplines, the “urban question” asks how space and the urban or city are related (The City Reader, 2009). The perspective that guides the ecological and the social spatial-dialect schools of thought asks the “urban question” in separate distinct terminology. Respected scholars from the ecological mode of thinking, like Burgess, Wirth and others view society and space from the rationale that geographical scope determines society (The City Reader, 2009). The “urban question” that results from the ecological paradigm sees the relationship between the city (space) as influencing the behaviors of individuals or society in the city. On the other hand...
“The environment is God's gift to everyone, and in our use of it we have a responsibility towards the poor, towards future generations and towards humanity as a whole,” (C.V. 48). Whether it is one man or an entire nation that suffers from poverty, humans have the moral obligation to help those in need to make ourselves better. “The Church's social doctrine has always maintained that justice must be applied to every phase of economic activity, because this is always concerned with man and his needs,” (C.V. 37).
In the past centuries scientific innovations have occupied people’s mind. People have been looking for answers about their existence with the help of science and the scientific method. But nothing has changed with people’s culture or behavior. However, something happened two thousand years ago that influenced and changed how some people perceive the world and self existence. It was the beginning of Christianity.
Thomas Aquinas for example, used this view to rebuke the criticisms of anthropocentrism, “We refute the error of those who claim that it is a sin for a man to kill brute animals. For animals are ordered to man’s use in the natural course of things, according to divine providence. Consequently, man uses them without any injustice, either by killing them or employing them in any other way” (Desjardins, 99). Not only has Aquinas claimed that animals are subject to man as a “natural course”, but also that anyway in which they are used is justified because of this. Aristotle takes this idea one step further, and claims that the sole basis for plants and animals’ existence is to serve humans. He later goes on to say that if nature makes nothing without purpose, then nature has made everything specifically for the sake of humankind. Both Aristotle and Aquinas based these beliefs upon the idea that only human beings are worthy of moral standing. This is due to the belief that humans alone have a “soul” capable of thinking and choosing. Since they thought animals not to have such a soul, animals must be morally irrelevant (Desjardins, 99). In this first example, the basis for environmental responsibility comes entirely from the belief that said the environment is meant to serve humans. Meaning that any obligations man has towards nature is entirely
As previously implied, cities are currently the antithesis of even the barest sense of sustainability. To succinctly define the term “sustainability” would be to say that it represents living within one’s needs. When it comes to the city, with almost zero local sources of food or goods, one’s means is pushed and twisted to include resources originating far beyond the boundaries of the urban landscape. Those within cities paradoxically have both minimal and vast options when it comes to continuing their existence, yet this blurred reality is entirely reliant on the resources that a city can pull in with its constantly active economy.
God has not abandoned the world. It is His will that His design and our hope for it will be realized through our co-operation in restoring its original harmony. In our own time we are witnessing a growth of an ecological awareness which needs to be encouraged, so that it will lead to practical programs and initiatives. An awareness of the relationship between God and humankind brings a fuller sense of the importance of the relationship between human beings and the natural environment, which is God's creation and which God entrusted to us to guard with wisdom and love (cf.