Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on comparisons of flood myths
3 flood stories myths essay
Importance of water flood myths
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on comparisons of flood myths
The Cosmic Myths of how the world commenced and how mankind came about, was told through different cultures. Elders would pass down the stories from generations to generations orally but the connection within the Old World and the New World is questionable. The Great Flood myths stories would be accountable to how Earth had a new beginning. Just like any other natural disaster, they are destructive and leave a mark behind. Based on cosmic conspiracy, floods create a new beginning to mankind but the cause for them is within the eyes of the beholder. The reasons for these differences are from the many generations of oral stories passed down so the myths will be vulnerable to being distorted from the original happenings. Cultural background also …show more content…
This story illustrates that god decided to destroy humans with the great flood and boat needed to be built to save some people and animals. “The uproar of mankind is intolerable and sleep is no longer possible...gods agreed to exterminate mankind.” (page 44). To briefly summarize the other stories with similar meanings, Noah’s Ark was based on human’s sins and since Noah was one with god, he was saved along with his family and the animals through the “ark”. Another story was Greco-Roman: Deucalion and Pyrrha in which humans except for Deucalion and Pyrrha shall be punished by Jupiter with the help of Neptune for “a new stock of men, unlike the former ones, a race of miraculous origin.” (page 56). The third story that depicts the idea of human sin is India: Manu in which Manu and a little fish that came into his hands became a ghasha. The ghasha warned that there will be a flood and that he should prepare a ship in which Manu was the only one that was saved at the end, “The flood then swept away all these creatures, and Manu alone remained here.” (page 55). These stories share a common theme in which the deity or the deities eradicate civilizations based on their sins with the great flood. Although there are warnings from the deities on saving a few through a boat, ark, or a …show more content…
A common story that revolves around humans adhering to god’s orders would be from the Mayan: The Popul-Vuh. Rather than punishing the humans, God decided that he should use the flood to erase the mistakes. The first mistake he made was not creating sound in the darkness when earth appeared but when the animals appeared, they began to communicate in their own way, “So they began to call and sing and hiss and snarl and scream..” (page 60-61) Since God needed a creature that talks to him he made men out of mud and wooden men but they have forgotten how they were formed. God needed, “men on the earth who will know My names, who will obey Me and love Me; and that will nourish and sustain Me.” (page 61). At the end of this story, he fulfilled his needs by creating four mens and their wives and cleared their
The Sumero-Babylonian version of the epic of Gilgamesh, after two and a half millennia of dormancy, was resurrected by British archaeologists in the nineteenth century. Amid the rubble of an Assyrian palace, the twelve clay tablets inscribed the adventures of the first hero of world literature – King Gilgamesh, whose oral folk tales go back to at least 3000 years before Christ (Harris 1). Tablet XI contains the story of the Flood. In this essay let us compare this flood account to the more recent Noah’s Flood account in Genesis of the Old Testament.
Most of us have probably heard the famous bible story about Noah’s Ark and The Flood. What most may not know, is that this story is just one of a great many. A variety of ancient cultures, from the Greeks and the Middle East, to Asia and the Americas, have in their mythologies a story of a Great Flood that drowns the earth. These stories mostly contain the same themes: a god or group of gods becomes angry; they flood the earth but save a small group of people. These people build a boat to survive. After the flood they repopulate the earth.
The Biblical account in Genesis, probably written by Moses around 1500 B.C., and the story of creation and flood in Ovid's Metamorphosis, written somewhere between 8 and 17 A.D., have weathered the criticism and become the most famous. The Genesis account, however, may be the most prominent of the two accounts. Within these accounts, are many similarities, as well as differences, which make these two writings well respected, while holding their own in the literary world. Though both accounts of the creation and flood are well respected on their own, when compared side to side, they are drastically different.
Humans have free will and their ideas to do what they please but the gods intervene with humans to help or harm them as they please. The gods expect respect from humans, such as sacrifices. In book 4, “ It was in Egypt, where the gods still marooned me. Eager as I was to voyage home… I’d failed you see, to render them full, flawless victims, and gods are always keen to see their rules obeyed” (4.390-394). Menelaus explains how he was deserted on an island because he did not make the proper sacrifices to the gods. This misfortune was cause directly by the gods; the gods wanted revenge because Menelaus failed to
Comparing each record of the flood can reveal how different cultural and religious backgrounds explain events of the world, and despite the stories differences, their similarities prove
Myths – as they are known to most of the world – give insight into the pasts of various countries and religions as the people saw them. They have been used to explain phenomena in nature or describe the tales of courageous and important men and women throughout history. Creation myths in particular define how the Earth itself was created, along with the universe, heavens, hell, people, and creatures that exist today. Genesis of Christian mythology, for instance, tells the story of how the single deity God spoke and formed everything from day and night to man and woman. Various African creation myths, such as with the Yoruba, explain the creation of the Earth through at least a couple gods working together and all life sprouting from a seed.
Not doing suitably what you are advised to do, are human downfalls having no recompense; whereas, following the rules on timely basis will be the most worthwhile outcome. Contrasting the Benjamin R. Foster’s and Stephen Mitchell’s translation “Gilgamesh,” to the Robert Altar’s translation “The Flood,” each story has a very different emphasis and draws a different moral. The emphasis of “Gilgamesh,” becoming eternal and what steps can be taken to receive it. However, the emphasis of “The Flood” is true righteousness will give a prolonged life. The different emphasis of each story causes the moral of each story to be different. For instance, “Gilgamesh” teaches; not doing what is advised will cause lost opportunities and “The Flood” teaches; righteousness will cause unforeseen blessings.
The myths which prove the contradictory behavior of the gods, acting as both benefactors and tormentors of man, can readily be explained when viewed in light of the prime directive for man, to worship the gods and not “overstep,” and the ensuing “Deus ex Mahina” which served to coerce man to fulfill his destiny as evidenced by the myths: “Pandora,” “Arachne, and “Odysseus.” Humankind and it’s range of vision over the gods beauty and power portrayed them to be benefactors but unseemingly it depicted their affliction towards humans.
The amazing stories of the great flood that are described in The Epic of Gilgamesh which is translated by N.K. Sandars and “The Story of the Flood” which is the King James version, both stories similarly. Many of the events of each story are very similar in ways and very different in some of them. From reading both stories I concluded that there was a huge flood that took place in that area of the world. Even though the way both stories describe the flood; The Epic of Gilgamesh is more imaginable. I say that because it is more realistic to have rain for six days, six nights than for forty days, forty nights. Both flood stories have a major similarity and difference though. Both stories described the same flood but they did it in different ways.
A good number of people know the famous story of the Genesis flood, but do they know how it resembles to the Gilgamesh flood story? It is mind bending how the main stories are so alike. The main theme is the biggest similarity between the two. They also differ greatly in the smaller details in the events that take place. In both stories the number of days for events are different, but the same basic event takes place. Along with many other similarities and differences. The stories are very much the same, but when comparing the details within they are very different.
The story of Noah’s Ark begins with God being upset at mankind's wickedness. He decides to destroy it with a flood. God new Noah was righteous and told him to build an ark so he would be safe from the rain. Noah did so and took aboard his family and pairs of every kind of animal. It rained for forty days and nights, until the highest mountains were covered. Then God sent a wind and the waters receded, and the...
The Epic of Gilgamesh is an example of how one man is able to preserve human and animal life. Gilgamesh built a six-story high boat and gathered every living creature before the flood hit Shurippak. Gilgamesh was the savior of the Mesopotamian people. Like Mesopotamians, the Aryan people had a savior as well. The source Victory Over Vritra explains how Indra “over all living men he rules as sovereign (44).” Indra gained the right to rule when he defeated the great dragon Vritra. Similar to Gilgamesh, Indra proved his strength when he overcame the perils which faced his people. In contrast to the latter, the Nile river was neither a god nor a human, yet the river was the savior of the Egyptians. The Nile “creates offerings without [divine] aid, making mankind for himself with multiform care (Hymn 22).” Egyptian livelihoods prospered and the people were able to live in great abundance of supplies thanks to the Nile. The Nile is similar to Gilgamesh because they both proved they can provide for the people without the interference of the divinities. Gilgamesh, Indra, and the Nile were the parts of creation stories that protected and provided for human
A creation myth is an explanation of how the world began and how people first came to inhabit it. Every creation myth is different, but there is similarity in most of them. Motifs are recurring ideas that help develop a theme and these motifs are common in many creation myths. Three similar motifs are the idea of a supreme being, the idea of people being created from organic material, and the idea of rulers being overthrown. These concepts appear in the Inuit, Greek, Hindu, Chinese, Norse, and many more myths. These three motifs connect to one another and are common in many creation myths.
The two creation myths chosen to compare and contrast focuses on the Norse culture of Iceland Vikings and the Genesis creation of the Hebrew origin of Christian culture. Both creation myths begin with an empty void where chaos or conflict develops. The Norse myth narrates a conflict between the fiery realm of Muspell and the dark, cold realm of Niflheim within the emptiness called ginnungagap and where nothing could grow. The Genesis conflict was between God and nothing, loneliness, and the need to create something beautiful.
In the Mesopotamian version: the gods apparently displeased with the evils of mankind decided to destroy it by means of a great flood. Ea, the god of wisdom and subtlety, was privy to their council and warned Utnapishtim, the Babylonian Noah, of the coming disaster. Utnapishtim was told to build a ship thirty cubits long and thirty cubits wide. Provision it and put in it specimens of every living thing. Then to board it with his family and possessions and launch it on the waters.