Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver and our society
The giver and our society
The giver vs modern society essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver and our society
I would not want to live in the society from The Giver.
I would not want to take pills for stirrings. An example of textual evidence is, “You’re ready for the pills, that’s all. That’s the treatment for Stirrings.” (Lowry 36) In my perspective, taking pills for a dream is not necessary. “Now he swallowed the small pill that his mother handed him.” (Lowry 37)Jonas had to take a pill and he didn’t want to, and I wouldn’t want to either. A quote from the novel is, “Pedaling rapidly down the path, Jonas felt oddly proud to have joined those who took the pills.” (Lowry 37) In my opinion, I feel the opposite of him, I would be ashamed that I took a medication for a dream.
I would not want to be assigned a job at the age of 12, to me, that
Bang! Bang! Bang! Jonas knocked on the door. A tall shadowed figure came to the door, it was the giver. He let them in and put them on a bed. Jonas started to ask questions to the giver, “Where are we.”
Scientists successfully cloned a sheep in July of 1996. Her name was Dolly. Even though scientists cloned a sheep, cloning humans is illegal. If someone tried to clone themselves, they might get a clone if the scientists complete the process correctly, but it is extremely wrong and illegal. The book, The House of the Scorpion, written by Nancy Farmer was about the life of a clone. The main character was Matteo Alacran, Matt. In other words the clone. The story takes place in the future. Matt lives at an estate owned by a drug lord. Matt is 1 of 7 clones. El Patron, the drug lord, uses clones to stay alive. Matt escapes the power of El Patron and survives. Throughout The House of the Scorpion the author analyzes the theme of acceptance and how happiness
The perfect world, no war, no disagreements, no fighting, and no problems. But is it really “perfect”? The Giver a novel by Lois Lowry takes place in a clean utopia where we find our main protaganist Jonas. We follow Jonas through his life eventually leading him to realize his world isnt perfect. This shows that there is flaws in all worlds and that no world can be “perfect” Jonas’s world is limited.
“It is a sin to write this. It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon a paper no others are to see. It is base and evil. It is as if we were speaking alone to no ears but our own. And we know well that there is no transgression blacker than to do or think alone” (p.3)
Loss can be a heartbreaking experience or just an inconvenience. It is significant in both books because of what the characters loss or what the characters loose. Whether it is a family member or an object, all the losses have some significance to the war or symbolism. In the novel, the book thief Liesel loses her mother. “ There was a chaos of goodbye”(Zusak 25). “The sudden realization that this would all be for nothing - that her mother would never write back and she would never see her again.” (Zusak 99). These two quotes explain Liesel's loss of her mother. When Liesel joined her new family and she never got a letter back, she realized that her old life is behind her and she can never go back to her mother. Her mother is thought to have
The Community keeps the memories away from the people, which means that they ignore their past, and cannot gain wisdom or bliss. For example, when the Giver was explaining what memories are to Jonas, he says, “There’s much more… I re-experience them again and again. It is how wisdom comes. And how we shape our future,”(Lowry 78). The Giver describes how wisdom comes in this quote.
At the end of “The Giver” Jonas finds a small village in elsewhere, however, many people are skeptical that this is true.. On page 166 of “The Giver” the author wrote, “Using his final strength, and a special knowledge that was deep inside him, Jonas found the sled that was waiting for him on top of the hill.” Some people believe that he actually found the sled and others believe that he was hallucinating because he was freezing to death in the cold. I believe that Jonas was hallucinating from the cold because it seems more practical. My justifications for this belief are first, his state of being, second, it can be hypothesized from the quote, “His entire concentration now had to be on moving his feet, warming Gabriel and himself, and going forward” which is found on page 165, and finally this theory could be proven by looking at the descriptions of the memories given to him versus what
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
The term The Giver refers to the old man, the former receiver who transfers all his memories to Jonas. The names giver and receiver remind us that memories are meant to be shared, the function of the old man is not holding memories but passing them from one person to another. That is why the title is not memory keepers' .The old man becomes the giver as Jonas becomes the receiver. Jonas also becomes the giver when he transfers his memories to Gabriel. But more interestingly, Jonas becomes the giver when he gives his memories to Gabriel (Booker10).
“As I slowly lost my speech, I gained my voice. As I diminished, I grew. As I lost so much, I finally started to find myself” (Neil Sellinger). ALS changes a lot of people’s opinion on life once they fully experience that they’re unable to do the things they once used to. Their perspective changes fully. In Tuesday’s with Morrie, Morrie teaches people to live life through love, money is not needed to have a happy life, and that accepting death is okay.
What would it be like to live in a world where love is a meaningless word, and people have no emotions? That’s exactly what life was like for Jonas, a boy who lived in a supposedly utopian society where everyone is the same. He is selected for a special job, and during his training he learns the importance of individuality and emotion. In the book and movie adaptations of The Giver, there are many similarities and differences.
In The Giver, by Lois Lowry, the reader is left with an uncertain ending about what happens to the main character of the story, Jonas, and his little friend, Gabriel. The plot of a story usually ends with a resolution, where the conflict of the story is resolved; however, this is clearly not the case with The Giver. It is not possible to be completely certain on the ending of this book by reading this story alone; however, it is possible to gather the evidence and assume what likely occurred in the ending of The Giver. One cannot be sure on what happened at the ending of The Giver; however, I believe that Jonas and Gabriel did not survive. I also believe that there could have been a more effective ending to the story; I highly disagree with Lois Lowry’s choice of leaving it up to the reader to decide what happens in the ending of the story, for it leaves too many unanswered questions. Overall, I did not enjoy the ending of The Giver due to its ambiguity.
“Youth is not a time of life; it is a state of mind; it is not a matter of rosy cheeks, red lips and supple knees; it is a matter of the will, quality of the imagination, a vigor of the emotions; it is the freshness of the deep springs of life” (Samuel Ullman). As teens go along in life, they learn through the things they read, hear, and see; in particular, when one reads a book, they can connect with the connotations and it can alter someone or influence. Being able to connect to something that another is feeling can really draw people in like bugs to a light. As more and more people can connect to books it becomes more popular so that they may feel a sense of security. Anthem by Ayn Rand and The Giver by Lois Lowry are two very great examples
The Language of Utopia is very different from the modern English language. The community in the novel ‘The Giver’ includes words with different meaning then as they are defined today. Words like assignment, release, and ceremony have taken on a whole new meaning throughout the book. Aging throughout the book comes all at once, the eights turn to nines, and the elevens turn to twelves. With the ceremonies there are rewards, such as receiving an assignment at the Ceremony of Twelve, or receiving a bicycle at nine. There are other ceremonies as well, such as the Ceremony of Loss, and the Ceremony of Release.
The true meaning of quotes is to find out what that author is trying to convey to their audience. One of my favorite quotes from the page is that our wilderness doesn’t need defense, it needs more defenders. I feel that the quote is trying to say that our wilderness doesn’t need to be controlled by nature preservers, just needs more people to enjoy and keep it from being destroyed. Our wildlife needs more people to defend and stand for our wilderness but be able to still keep it open for others to view. I feel I should have the responsibility to know my limitations on how to keep my surroundings under good care.