Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Family As A Primary Social Group
Family in socialisation
Family in socialisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
Regarding the practice of celebrating birthdays, our society celebrates them better than the society in The Giver does. This is because our society allows members to celebrate every individual birthday. Every member
This is because our society does not limit the number of members in a family unit and the type of members in it. For instance, a family could contain the parents, children, grandparents, and other relatives. In contrast, the society in The Giver limits the number of members in a family unit and what a family unit is made out of. "Two children-one male, one female-to each family unit. It was written very clearly in the rules" (Lowry 8). This quote explains that every family unit has four members that contain the parents and two children, one of each gender. The society in The Giver does not allow any changes in the number or the gender of the members in a family unit. Although both societies have an organized way of the structure of a family unit, our society is better because it gives us the freedom of deciding what we want and expect of a family unit.
Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and
The book The Giver by Lois Lowry is a different book. This book is a futuristic book, I mean showing beyond the present. It is mainly based on a child, and his future work and or destination, making history in a small community, where everything is quiet and could be said perfect and controlled. Each of its inhabitants is assigned to their job to avoid mistakes. Curiously, the book is about people, not their ignorance, but their lack of life experiences and knowledge of the outside world. This perhaps shows the day that the world will be a miserable world in my view and colorless, literally. It would be an empty, false and perfect life, without errors, and incomplete happiness, where the word love feels like it has lost its meaning and has become somewhat devalued.
Beneath the surface of orderliness and sameness in both communities lies an extensive network of social discipline. In The Giver, citizens are distributed spatially according to their stage of life. For example, the newborn children live together at the Nurturing Center, children and adults live together in families, and the oldest adults live together in the House of the Old. Also, the power structures control activities for a purpose to encourage those that are useful towards the society and those that are considered counterproductive. Therefore, children’s lives are tightly regulated by their defined jobs and participation in the...
In these two societies, they both are similar by having a strict government that does not let anyone leave the community but however, in The Giver no body...
The society in Lois Lowry’s book The Giver is like a freshly printed newspaper every page is crisp and clean, but when a page is crumpled or stained the only solution is to remove it. Problems in the town are created and solved by the same cause, euthanasia. Euthanasia, in the book, is used on multiple types of people; the young who would create problems for the society; the old; and anyone who threatens the order and structure of the place. The leaders euthanize people to protect their community. Usually in situations where many suffer and only one or few benefit, it is whoever is in charge that gets blamed, but since the rulers of the society are just as unaware as the people, it is the creators of the society that are at fault.
The Giver provides a chance that readers can compare the real world with the society described in this book through some words, such as release, Birthmothers, and so on. Therefore, readers could be able to see what is happening right now in the real society in which they live by reading her fiction. The author, Lowry, might build the real world in this fiction by her unique point of view.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
The two novels’ family unit system is very different from each other. The family structure in The Giver is somewhat similar to ours today. The families consist of parents and children but each family unit is limited. A unit is restricted to two adult parents, one male child, and one female child. Brave New World has no family structure. A motto included in the novel states, “everyone belongs to everyone else”. Every adult lives alone in his or her own apartment with no spouse but with many sexual partners.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
"How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made." And it was. The community in The Giver was so the same that almost nothing happened. Imagine a life like that. There was no discrimination because there was nothing to discriminate about, a place where everyone would have shelter and an equal amount of food, and a place where everyone has the right to a proper education. Well, that is why I think The Giver’s community is a utopian society. Utopian is the perfect word for a place like that. It is heavenly, fair, and perfect in so many ways. I am here to tell you why in my opinion it is a utopian society rather than a dystopian society with the three reasons from the Universal Declaration of Human Rights listed above. Now let me begin to tell you why.
A small percent of people on earth say, “The world is perfect the way it is”. Well what do you think about the earth, do you think the earth is perfect? Well, The Giver is a dystopian society where everything is “perfect” and there is nothing wrong with it. The Giver matches this world of America today. Let’s hope and dream that America WILL be better than it is now.
In The Giver, it is a world of sameness, people are given husband/wives, they all dress the same, and everyone gets their jobs given to them. Citizens should realize from Lowry’s warning, being different is good, and a world of conformity is not as good as it
When asked why Lowery used a dystopian society she stated, “ I chose the setting because I wanted to give the reader a warring that society will never be perfect.”(Lowry) If she would have chosen a different setting the book I do not believe the book would have been the same. Lowry stated, “that when writing The Giver created a world that existed in her imagination only. She got ride of all the things she feared and disliked: violence, prejudice, poverty and injustice.
The first reason I would not like to live in The Giver society is the society has strict rules. For example,“The children all received their bicycle at Nine; they were not allowed to ride bicycles before then.” (PG.14, P.4). The society has a strict rule that kids under nine are not allowed to ride bikes. Another quote is, “Two children-one male, one female-to each family unit. It was written very clearly in the rules.” (PG.10 P.2). In the rules it states that a family unit needs to have a certain number of kids and a certain gender. Lastly,“It was one of the rituals, the evening telling of feelings.” (PG. 6 P. 6)I wouldn’t want to tell my feelings to my family if they are very personal and I can’t explain them.
The idea of family is different from person to person. Regardless of the differences, everyone’s family is unique and special in their own way. No one can judge or discriminate against people for their meaning and interpretation of what a family looks like. For example, family may have two parents; one parent; or no parents (since these are brief phrases, semi-colons shouldn't be used). The variation and differences between families makes culture and society so diverse. Family does not have limitations or boundaries (true). As long as the definition of family contains the qualities of unconditional love, and endless support, help, and guidance; all different families (awk) will be able to succeed and achieve a greater feeling of happiness and a sense of belonging and acceptance.
To thoroughly elaborate on the institution of family we most look at the family as it was before and how much it has changed over time. Throughout the years we are recognizing that the family is slowly being replaced by other agents of socialization. Families in the past consisted of a mother and a father and most times children. We are, as many societies a patriarchal society; men are usually the head of the households. This has always been considered the norm.