The true meaning of quotes is to find out what that author is trying to convey to their audience. One of my favorite quotes from the page is that our wilderness doesn’t need defense, it needs more defenders. I feel that the quote is trying to say that our wilderness doesn’t need to be controlled by nature preservers, just needs more people to enjoy and keep it from being destroyed. Our wildlife needs more people to defend and stand for our wilderness but be able to still keep it open for others to view. I feel I should have the responsibility to know my limitations on how to keep my surroundings under good care.
The quote also conveys that I as a person need to help defend my surroundings so I can have a better nature experience. In the
future, I feel like if I don’t take care of our desert; it could all just go away. I feel that the internet will control all my future, and people no longer will enjoy the desert and cherish what it used to be. I can only do better by making sure that I keep my desert clean from trash that could harm any animals. On the flip side, we don’t know what will happen if we close off all the land preserves. If they were to close, there no longer there to be enjoyed. Since people off road, and do activities like that, it’s hard to insure that the land will be protected. If Joshua Tree National Park were to close, there’s a higher chance of it becoming off road land instead of preserved land. I feel that humans are supposed to be here as much as any other species. People need to let life just happen. If something goes extinct it’s for a reason. If a cherished species goes extinct people will have to learn from their mistakes. Our wildlife doesn’t need defense- let nature happen. We just need more people to defend and realize what is happening to our desert.
Kleinfeld tries to categorize Chris McCandless as a hero, dumb jerk, or soul searcher. She uses pathos as well as blatantly stating her opinion to achieve her goal. In Jon Krakauer’s book Into the Wild we see many aspects of Chris McCandless that both support and contradicts these categorizations given by Kleinfeld. Jon Krakauer shows us every aspect of Chris McCandless’s journey as well as his life before, by doing this Krakauer shows Chris McCandless is not just one category, he is not any category at all. Kleinfeld’s condescending tone expresses the lack of heroism she sees in McCandless. (Adjust thesis to fit new purpose).
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
Who could possibly know that the story of one young man could turn the people of Alaska against him, and others from around the country to rally behind his almost majestic journey. Jon Krakauer set out to get Chris McCandless’s story written in greater depth after his article was ran in the magazine Outside and he received so much mail on that topic that inspired him to do more, more than just Chris’s journey itself. This essay will analyze Jon Krakauer’s book Into The Wild in order to show how well he used the rhetorical analysis concepts and rhetorical appeals.
The epigraphs presented by Krakauer before each chapter of the memoir Into the Wild dive deep into the life of Chris McCandless before and after his journey into the Alaskan wilderness. They compare him to famous “coming of age characters” and specific ideas written by some of his favorite philosophers. These give the reader a stronger sense of who Chris was and why he made the decision to ultimately walk alone into the wild.
to begin climbing in the first place. Chris McCandless was determined to not only go but to complete the climb as well. Furthermore, as Chris aged and entered high school, his rareness showed even more prominently. He became the captain of the cross-country team. He loved the role and concocted grueling training regimens that his teammates remember still well. “He was really into pushing himself,” recalls Gordy Cucullu, a former member of the team. “Chris invented this workout he called Road Warriors: he would lead us on long, killer runs through places like farmers’ fields and construction sites, places we weren’t supposed to be, and intentionally try to get us lost. We’d run as far and as fast as we could, down strange roads, through the woods, whatever. The whole idea was to lose our bearings, to push ourselves into unknown territory.
Stacy notes that this passage is related to "a person getting a sense of their self in relation to Nature." The Web material describes Thoreau’s practice of linking landscape and identity.
Throughout the novel, Christopher McCandless’s character changed over time. Up to McCandless’s death, he wanted to live with the wild and to be away from civilization as far as possible. He changes his mind when he writes “HAPPINESS ONLY REAL WHEN SHARED” (189). His purpose of living in the wild is to live with freedom and do whatever he wishes to do. However, he realizes he was a “refuge in nature” (189) and intended to abandon his solitary life and rejoin the human community. It is assumed that McCandless died a preventable death because of his unpreparedness, but it is now undeniable that his adversity is what caused his mortality. “…McCandless simple had the misfortune to eat moldy seeds. An innocent mistake, it was nevertheless sufficient to end his life” (194). Had he not eaten the moldy seeds, he would have remained alive to tell the tale.
After World War II, Louie Zamperini writes a letter to Mutsuhiro Watanabe, also known as “the Bird” saying that, “The post-war nightmares caused my life to crumble, but thanks to a confrontation with God through the evangelist Billy Graham, I committed my life to Christ. Love has replaced the hate I had for you. Christ said, ‘Forgive your enemies and pray for them.”’ This is demonstrated in the novel, Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand. This tells an emotional story about Louie Zamperini's experiences as an Olympic athlete, World War II veteran, and an American POW. After his Olympic dreams are crushed when he gets drafted at age 24, he experienced things most people cannot even imagine, when he returns he makes
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
“I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential
He believes that the wilderness has helped form us and that if we allow industrialization to push through the people of our nation will have lost part of themselves; they will have lost the part of themselves that was formed by the wilderness “idea.” Once the forests are destroyed they will have nothing to look back at or to remind them of where they came from or what was, and he argues everyone need to preserve all of what we have now.
If a man's word isn’t any good, he’s no good himself. This is a quote from Where The Red Fern Grows. Billy made a promise with his dogs, that if they treed a coon, he would do the rest. The meaning of the quote is that if you lie you aren’t being true to yourself. You also aren’t showing any honesty or honor to the person/thing you made your deal of promise with. I believe that this is true and something more people could follow.
Abbey informs readers about corruption and also persuades his readers to take action. His tone in the essay is harsh Abbey says “We owe it nothing but the taxation it exports from us under threats of seizure of property, imprisonment, or in some cases already, when resisted, a violent death by gunfire”. Throughout the essay Abbey is informative and persuasive on the defense of “home” and is evoking emotions from the readers. He defines Eco-Defense as “Fighting back” or “sabotage”. Abbey then is persuading the readers to take action illegally by “Spiking trees” that are going to be cut down. Although it is a little extreme Abbey is effective in persuading the audience to take action. There is only one earth, The facts are clear it 's not long before rainforests are destroyed. That is why it is justified when the “Next time you enter a forest scheduled for chainsaw massacre carry a hammer and some nails to spike the trees”. Citizens need to take action on the preservation of the wilderness if we want it to
I would not want to take pills for stirrings. An example of textual evidence is, “You’re ready for the pills, that’s all. That’s the treatment for Stirrings.” (Lowry 36) In my perspective, taking pills for a dream is not necessary. “Now he swallowed the small pill that his mother handed him.” (Lowry 37)Jonas had to take a pill and he didn’t want to, and I wouldn’t want to either. A quote from the novel is, “Pedaling rapidly down the path, Jonas felt oddly proud to have joined those who took the pills.” (Lowry 37) In my opinion, I feel the opposite of him, I would be ashamed that I took a medication for a dream.
... of the writer to the readers of the novel to be a part of nature and should not try to control it.