Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of war
All over the world, people die everyday due to war, starvation, crime and under development in medicine and technology. Absence of food and technology consumes 30% of the world. With everyone being equal and the same, there would be no crime, no wars and more progression as the human species. Wars would disappear, as people would be united and therefore peaceful. As shown in the novel the giver by Lois Lowry, civilians live in a peaceful and harmonious environment with no conflict or crime. Could this be the future for humanity? One of peace and progression?
First of all, we should enact conformity to drop all war tensions and large-scale conflicts in the world. An estimated 60-80 million people died in world war two with around 40 million of those deaths being civilians. An American soldier fighting in the pacific theatre wrote, “This place is a hell hole. So many civilians have died from injuries and starvation. Some of our men have gone mad”. Many soldiers suffered from post-traumatic stress and never fully lived their lives again. War ruins people mentally, physically and as a population. Even today, wars are devastating innocent people and soldiers especially in the Middle East. Conformity could completely deactivate wars by synchronizing everyone into perfect harmony.
…show more content…
With selected leaders who make decisions for humanity, there would be no cause for fighting and with all nations being equally provided for; there wouldn’t be a reason for war. Safety would be assured to all. Isn’t that what everyone dreams of for their children? Did you know that one third of the worlds population doesn’t have enough food?
Did you know that 12 million people are currently suffering from famine? These saddening statistics are just parts of the painful truth that prove that some parts of the world have fallen far behind when it comes to standards of food and medicine. If everyone was at the standard of a modern first world country, the average longevity of most people could be as high as ninety with developments in technology growing hugely (as all people would be focused of certain developments.) With everyone nourished and healthy, the human species could progress immensely and focus on innovation and begin a new industrial
revolution. People say individualism brings ideas and uniqueness to communities. This is quite simply wrong. Individualism brings about violence and radicalism. People don’t believe the world is suitable for them and lash out. These destructive tendencies can all be traced back to individualism and the atrocious thoughts people can gain from it. Senior police officer Jean Staples stated “almost every crime we see is committed out of jealousy, greed or not having enough of something. We also get the occasional rebel who decides to act out because they like the rush.” This statement alone proves that people with individualism are often radical and violent. Conformity brings a peace and harmony that is seen in The Giver. There is no crime. There are no thefts. It is the perfect world. Individualism involves terrorists and criminals. Which world would you rather live in?
The movie, Cool Hand Luke, tells a story of a man named, Lucas Jackson, who is confronted with the challenges of authority after being wrongfully convicted of crime too petty and insignificant to equate to the large sentence he had received. Throughout the entire length of the film, Lucas is faced with tremendous physical and emotional torture in numerous and inhuman ways. Despite the astounding punishments Luke is able to endure throughout the film, he manages to gain the respect of the prisoners and guards’, as well as utilizing his tenacity, charisma, and wits to not only influence the prison chain-gang, but to gain the power in order to unmask and expose the authority around them. In the following essay, I will analyze and describe how
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
In Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, Beatrice and Benedict rant about marriage for most of the beginning of the play, while Claudio raves about how wonderful it will be being married to Hero. Yet in the end, Claudio exchanges his marriage to Hero for an opportunity to bash her in public, while Beatrice and Benedick marry despite that they were mortal enemies for most of the first three acts. How did the situation swing around to this degree? Beatrice and Benedick had been using the most extreme metaphors to demonstrate their scorn of each other and of marriage, and Claudio had been doing the same to demonstrate his love of Hero. Not only did none of these three characters mean what they were saying, but meant the reverse, and the people that plotted to bring them together or pull them apart plotted because they understood on some level what each really wanted.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Loss of Freedom in The Giver The Giver, a book written by Lois Lowry, questioned my ideas, thoughts and beliefs. The novel describes an ideal society, in which everything is supposed to be perfect, with all life’s problems solved. It is all about being happy with what the people have and not questioning their lifestyles because they did not know the difference between good and bad. The people are denied of their preferable way of life without their knowledge of how the real world is supposed to be. In the I can. However, the citizens of this society are not able to control their life; for example their choice of clothing, choice of loving and having feelings, or choice of family members. From all existing creatures, we humans differ because we are able to use our brain to make decisions. In the novel, the people of the given society have authority figures that show them how to live their life. “Katya, became a Nine and removed her hair ribbons and got her bicycle” (P The rules start with small things like what age one starts to ride a bike, which age group wears certain types of jackets, the clothing one wears each day, and even what to eat. In the real world, we humans make similar decisions for ourselves without thinking about it. People need guidance in their life to the right way of living but not a book of instructions. Many of us live each day dreaming of our future family and all the happiness we may get from that. I cannot imagine how it feels not to have freedom to feel and love. “Jonas, she said with a smile, the feeling you described as wanting? It was your the opposite sex. Beginning from early age, children are controlled not to feel or appreciate his/her opposite sex. The adults are made to take the pills to annihilate their sexual desires. When the children grow up and become adults, more decisions are made for them. When one is old enough to get married, the superior power chooses a mate for the person and is wedded. This is when I question the meaning of marriage. a future together, not a partnership that you deal with like a business. Although many cultures have different say in this sacred ceremony, most have similar ideas. To many people, love is affection based on admiration or common interests and warm attachment, enthusiasm or devotion. How can one live happy in life without the experience of such feelings? These individuals in the novel did not know better, if they knew how good it is to feel love or even know a good taste when it is good, then they would not be happy with the way of life in their community. “J What if they were allowed to choose their own mate?
First of all I thought chapters 12-19 were really action packed when it came to memories. These chapters were not OMINOUS because it was really keeping you on your toes and, personally I thought this was the best section of chapters out of the entire book. There was so much more to these chapters because of all the terrible memories that Jonas received. The topics that were really interesting to me was specifically releasing twins,Rosemary and what releasing is. When I first thought of releasing, I thought of it as a specific place where the bad people become punished and the old go to a retirement home alive. Releasing is really just injecting people with a death needle. The quote I chose was "He killed it! My father killed it!" (150) I felt RUEFUL for Jonas because he saw his dad kill somebody without feeling a thing. I chose this quote because it really shows they have no choice and there emotionless. I would call these people robots because they don't know what they're doing. This quote also aroused a thinking question. How does no one feel sad for someone who just got injected and killed? I know in the book Lowry states
Worldwide, 870 million people — about one in eight— are hungry. That is nearly three times the population of the United States. It is hard to imagine in the modern world that a country cannot feed its people, but in 1984, the Ethiopian Famine took over one million lives. There were many causes that contributed to the complications faced in Ethiopia. These problems received major attention in the global Community. The famine drastically changed people’s lives because of the lack of food and resources and affected Ethiopia to our present day.
(MIP-1) Jonas starts learning that he is different from the rest, and he starts to ask a lot of questions. (SIP-A) Jonas starts seeing differently before he is even picked to be the Receiver, and so he starts having all of these questions that nobody an answer. (STEWE-1) At the beginning, Jonas talks to his family as if there wasn’t a such thing as animals, or other things because he doesn’t know anything about what life was like before the community, “‘Why do you think the visitors didn’t obey rules?’ Mother asked. Lily considered, and shook her head. ‘I don’t know. They acted like...like…’ ‘Animals?’ Jonas suggested. He laughed. ‘Thats right,’ Lily said, laughing too. ‘Like animals.’ Neither child knew what the word meant, exactly, but it
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
The word conformity means changing your behaviour or attitudes to belong into society. Conformity is also known as ‘majority influence’. There are three types of conformity: Compliance is changing your behaviour to fit in with the public but not agreeing with it privately, Internalisation is changing your behaviour and believing it is right privately too, and finally Identification is changing behaviour to fit into a social role. There are two explanations as to why people conform: Normative social influence explains that people have a desire to be liked so they conform to fit in, and Informational social influence explains that people who have a desire to be right will conform and look at others for guidance.
Conformity is the process of understanding to majority influence and is defined by David Myers (1991) as a change in behavior or belief a result of real or imagined group pressure
In the past ten years the world population exceeded six billion people with most of the growth occurring in the poorest, least developed countries in the world. The rapidly increasing population and the quickly declining amount of land are relative and the rate at which hunger is increasing rises with each passing year. We cannot afford to continue to expand our world population at such an alarming rate, for already we are suffering the consequences. Hunger has been a problem for our world for thousands of years. But now that we have the technology and knowledge to stamp it out, time is running short.
Niger and Sierra Leone, the two poorest countries in the world only have a GDP of around 500 dollars per capita. Which, compared to Canada’s 27,000 dollars per capita, is considerably low. In the 48 poorest countries, an average of 2$ a day is made by each working person. Imagine living off 2$ a day in Canada, you couldn’t even buy a Big Mac and a drink for 2$. This is making starvation a very serious problem in 3rd-world countries, not to mention their low immune systems, used for preventing disease, not working right from the lack of nutrition.
Colin Wilson once said, "The Average man is a conformist, accepting miseries and disasters with the stoicism of a cow standing in the rain." A conformist is a person who conforms to accepted behavior or established practices. That means someone who follows others, whether it is about decision making or their attitude. In today 's society I would say that most of the people are conformist, this includes both teenagers and adults. Being a conformist in my opinion can be bad and good for various reasons. If the attitude of the specific person has changed for the better, such as a snobby boy/girl becoming more respectful, that it definitely a positive change. Other people can change their attitude for
One of the most complex issues in the world today concerns human population. The number of people living off the earth’s resources and stressing its ecosystem has doubled in just forty years. In 1960 there were 3 billion of us; today there are 6 billion. We have no idea what maximum number of people the earth will support. Therefore, the very first question that comes into people’s mind is that are there enough food for all of us in the future? There is no answer for that. Food shortage has become a serious problem among many countries around the world. There are many different reasons why people are starving all over the world. The lack of economic justice and water shortages are just merely two examples out of them all.