The Five Strengths Of The Multiple Intelligence Theory

The multiple intelligence theory is based on eight different intelligences which reflect a person 's intellectual ability. This model of intelligence challenges other theories such as the General Intelligence Theory created by Charles Spearman. Spearman’s theory focuses on a person 's ability to perform efficiently while being tested as well as their general cognitive capability. The MI theory differs due to the fact that it explores how test scores are not necessarily accurate representations of the amount of knowledge a person possesses because it has been demonstrated through this theory and experimental research that human beings are not necessarily less intellectually capable if they do not contain linguistic or logical-mathematical intelligences.

Learning style models differ depending on the theorist that has created them, even though practically all of them contain an accentuation on processing and personality. The learning styles model created by Harvey Silver, Richard Strong, and Matthew Perini versus the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model, is one example of how their is a wide range of theories that can appreciated. These two models diverge because while Silver’s model focuses on the four main types of learner styles, the Dunn and Dunn model explores the 21 elements that affect how a human being learns. The Dunn and Dunn model classifies these 21 elements into five categories: emotional, environmental, sociological, psychological and physiological variables. Silver’s model instead explores the strengths of each of the four types of learners. Although these models contain differences, they both put an emphasis on the relevance of the process and approaches to learning, while Gardner does not eminently consider either ideas within his theory.

Despite the Multiple Intelligence theory and learning styles being able to work together in harmony to create lesson plans and grading formats in the classroom that allow all students the opportunity to reach their full potential, they also contain varied views on the assessment of proficiency. That being said, I believe if both models are implemented in the classroom positive results will be