Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reasons why empires fall
World history review russian revolution ww1
Economic, social and political effects of the first world war on russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reasons why empires fall
The Extent to Which the First World War Contributed to the Fall of Czardom in Russia
Since the 1905 Revolution, the Czardom continued to decline. The
insincerity of the Czar, setting up of Dumas, the rise of
revolutionary group and so on had created an explosive situation in
Russia. In 1914, Czar Nicolas II decided to enter the First World War
in order to rise the prestige and gain support from people, however,
it was the fatal mistake ever made by the royal family which acted as
a catalyst for the February Revolution. Though at the beginning, the
Russian seemed to support to enter the war, military defeats the
government's incompetence soon soured much of the population.
Maladministration and ineffective economic policies hurt the country
financially, logistically and militarily.
Russia entered the war unprepared. There was a grave lack of
co-ordination between the Ministry of War and the Front. War
Industries Committee was formed to ensure that necessary supplies
reached the front. But army officers quarreled with civilian leaders
and refused to cooperate with the committee. The army was inadequately
trained and equipped. They were instructed to pick up weapons from the
dead and the superiority of the Germans lowered the morale and spirits
of the soldiers. Several severe defeats in the battlefields had made
the soldiers lost their faith and not as loyal to Czar as they were in
1905. They blamed Nicolas II for the lost. Moreover, Nicholas II went
to the front to assume leadership of the army, leaving behind the
Czarina, Alexandra, and Rasputin, an evil monk, who exercised
influence on policy and ministerial appointments after the C...
... middle of paper ...
...overnment afterwards, especially
during the First World War. However, it could not say that this was a
major cause of the fall of Czardom, since Rasputin was murdered by
nobles in 1916, the situation was no better onwards. Revolution still
broke out after a year later. But Czarina Alexandra and Rasputin
undoubtedly decreased the regime's prestige and credibility.
To conclude, though there were lots of underlying causes that
contributed to the fall of Czardom, they only created an explosive
time bomb for a revolution. It was the WWI act as a trigger, brought
about the people and overthrown the Czardom in 1917 February
Revolution. Therefore, WWI is the major cause to the fall of Czardom.
Reference:
Aspects of European History 1789-1980 --- Stephen J. Lee
Mastering Modern European History --- Stuart T. Miller
For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and population under sever economic and social conditions; consequently, during the late 19th century and early 20th century, various movements were staging demonstrations to overthrow the oppressive government. Poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment; in addition, the country was industrially backward compared to countries such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernize, this was to do with the tsars lack of effort for reforms. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine and poor morale could be found in all aspects of Russian life. Furthermore, the tsar committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats.
With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior to the war is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. No war is fought without the struggle for resources, and with Russia still rapidly lagging behind in the international industrialisation race by the turn of the 20th century, the stage was set for social unrest and uprising against its already uncoordinated and temporarily displaced government. With inconceivable demands for soldiers, cavalry and warfare paraphernalia, Russia stood little chance in the face of the great powers of World War One.
In this instance Nicholas did not understand the magnitude of his people's, more specifically the soldiers suffering while at war with Austria and Germany. Often times the war minister, Vladimir Sukhomlinov, misinformed Nicholas regarding the conditions of soldiers leaving the Russian army without food, clothing and weapons. Through this miscommunication, it left not merely the soldiers without defense, but the country defenseless along with them. As a result, “By the following spring, the shortage had grown so severe that many soldiers charged into battle without guns. Instead, commanders told them to pick up their weapons from the men killed in front lines. At the same time, soldiers were limited to firing just ten shots a day. Sometimes they were even forbidden to return enemy fire” (134). This was just one piece of the puzzle that led to the crumble of the Russian autocracy. Especially considering the fact that everyone could see their efforts for winning the war were dissipating all except for one, “. . . everyone in the tsar’s government knew it… everyone, that is, except Nicholas himself” (135). As shown in this instance, basic misconceptions can begin a ripple effect that has the power to put a country in
Though the book has no footnotes, it was researched methodically through documents and the work of other scholars. It is very detailed and specific for such a short book. The information about the foreign policy of Russia under Catherine’s rule, and her various wars and military maneuvers, helped explain some of the issues Russian is currently undergoing today in Crimea, the Ukraine and with Turkey. The central theme of reform was also examined in depth, and given the time in which she ruled, and the size of the country, it astonishes me the undertaking Catherine had in front of her. It could take 18 months for an imperial order to reach the far eastern side of Russia, then 18 more months for a reply to get back to her at the
Russia in the 1930s By 1928, Stalin had ousted Trotsky and the rest of the Left opposition. In four years, Stalin had single handedly taken major steps away from Lenin’s collective leadership and free inter-party debate and replaced them with his autocratic dictatorship. Stalin began to secure predominant power over the communist party and the state by destroying passive opposition from the peasantry and former Lenin supporters. He won growing support from the working class, who were impressed with the initial five-year plan. It promised increased industrialization, which would lead to socialism in one country within their lifetime.
While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”
this was the seen to be “freedom” for them as they began to get what
Most popular uprisings in recent history have been characterized by a brief period of incredible potential and hope, only to collapse in failure and despair. Even the supposedly 'successful' Russian Revolution of 1917 followed this pattern. Revolutionaries threw off centuries of imperial rule and oppression in order to create a new world of freedom, peace and equality... only to end up with Stalin, purges, gulags, dekulakization - and ultimately decades of Bolshevik1 rule and oppression. Although it can sometimes be disheartening to review this long history of failure and oppression, valuable insights can be gained by investigating these past revolutions. The achievements and promise of the revolutionaries can be studied and their strengths marked. The weaknesses that led to their eventual defeat and decay must also be understood, so that the same mistakes are not made again. This article will address these themes in the context of the Russian Revolution at the Kronstadt navel base.2
As they grew older, they soon realized that everything that they’d been doing the entire time was wrong and regretted joining the Red Guards. They realized that all these times, they were killing innocent people that clearly were doing nothing to harm the country.
It was Tzar Nicholas 2 political naivete and extreme obstinance that led to the downfall of the Russia
I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent, along with economic hardships, caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution, as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards.
Throughout history, revolutions have developed in response to a variety of conditions. These revolutions have often resulted in significant political, economic, and social change. As the 1900’s rolled in, European nations were at peace, that is until the darker forces were pushing Europe toward war. Those darker forces included nationalism and alliance systems that would help fuel the Great War or World War I. The effects of World War I were massive including the Treaty of Versailles and the enormous amount of human casualties as well as economic losses. During World War I, another revolution broke out in Russia, removing Russia from the war and transformed the Russian empire into the first Communist state. There were many causes of the Russian Revolution including the weakness of the Czar and World War I. Finally, there were many effects of the Russian Revolution, two of which included the establishment of a communist government as well as a new economic policy.
in the war in between 1939 and the end of 1941, was largely based on a
The Russian’s were wrong in having hope for a reformed government. Following the careless Czar came Lenin and Stalin, both continuing the reign of terror that the Czar had left behind. Instead of a Czarist gover...
After their defeat in the Crimean war (1853-1856), Russia’s leaders realized they were falling behind much of Europe in terms of modernisation and industrialisation. Alexander II took control of the empire and made the first steps towards radically improving the country’s infrastructure. Transcontinental railways were built and the government strengthened Russia’s economy by promoting industrialisation with the construction of factory complexes throughout...