More handpicked essays just for you.
Compelling words about reducing your carbon footprint
Climate change effects from greenhouse gas emissions
Greenhouse effect on global warming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The EU consists of 28 countries which collaborate in economic, political, cultural and environmental field. Despite the fact that the top news about the EU actions is connected mostly about economic and politics, environment and climate changes are also important topics to the EU. Because of the size of the EU, the EU leaders have broad acres to look after and to control climate changes there. The EU policy on climate changes is very structured, because of its targets, collaborations with other world’s countries and with researchers who are specialists in field of climate changes.
The climate changes are one f the main things that all nations all over the world are worried about and try to prevent it. The climate changes include diminishing of greenhouse gas emissions, carbon economy, global warming and collective emission level. The climate changes have been developed thanks to humankind activities hat includes industrialization and other kind of development on technologies. To lower the global warming, greenhouse gas emissions and other climate changes, the EU need to establish greener lifestyle for Europeans that would include greener technologies and lower collective emissions. Making everything much greener can affect positively not only Europeans lifestyle and health but also will boost the economy, create jobs and strengthen Europe’s competitiveness. Developing policy on climate changes can evoke better situation in all fields that can develop all 28 EU member countries.
The greenhouse gas emissions, global warming, carbon emissions and other climate changes can’t be putted in one country’s border it affects all nations no matter where they are geographically located. This is the main reason why the EU collaborates with ...
... middle of paper ...
...ults. And also citizens all over the world need to know the benefits of actions that are connected with decreasing climate changes. And at last, the EU need to collaborate not only with the major emitting countries, but also with NGOs, academic researchers, private companies, leaders of counties and citizens to make it clear to them co-benefits for themselves and humankind in general.
To sum up, the EU drawn attention on climate changes and has essential goals to help other regions and countries to change the world. According to the Kyoto Protocol, the EU and other countries have big dreams about changing climate in positive way. That how the EU manages to accomplish the defined aims on the Kyoto Protocol depends on the EU leaders and Europeans also on the major emitting countries and other powerful world’s countries which have essential impact on climate changes.
The Kyoto Protocol was developed in Kyoto, Japan in 1997 and came into full force on the 16th of February 2005 in an effort to compact climate change (“Kyoto Protocol Reference Manual,” 2008). By targeting green house gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol created an effort to “promote sustainable development (“Kyoto Protocol To The United Nations,” 1998).” The protocol’s goal was to reduce green house gas emissions from 1990 by 4.2% by 2008-2012, which 37 developed countries signed and pledged to (Schiermeier, 2012). With such a specific target, the goal was clear and quantifiable, making it easy to measure, when the time came, whether or not the Kyoto Protocol’s goal had been reached. Also, the involvement of these 37 countries was crucial in obtaining the goal. Without international cooperation the goal of reducing carbon emissions would never be effective as green house gasses effect the entire globe’s atmosphere not one local
The purpose of this editorial is to inform the reader about climate change and the damage it’s doing to the world. He is sending out a message that waiting to make a change isn’t an option. The criticism in the editorial is that the Kyoto protocol isn’t sufficient enough to reduce emissions that cause climate
The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), aimed at fighting global warming to lessen climate change. The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty with the goal of achieving the "stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system’’
Although it is often a topic for contention in politics, global warming over the span of several decades, has led to climate change, which has had an alarming impact globally. Climate change needs to ...
Furthermore, this analysis must take place amidst serious gaps in the existing research and technology concerning the developing climatic conditions. For these reasons, global warming stands as one of the most daunting policy issues facing our world today. This is compounded by the debate over the very existence of climate change. While countless sources of empirical evidence testify to the very real presence of climate change the world over, considerable denial of the phenomenon still exists. The argument has been made that evidence of climate change is a gross overstatement, or in some cases, a complete fabrication.
Nearly 200 countries have signed the Kyoto Protocol and they must reduce four greenhouse gases, in order to struggle with global warming. There are several perspectives on the effects of global warming on the environment. In this essay, we will consider the impacts and consequences of global warming. In the process, it will be clarified that there are positive and negative impacts of global warming. Ecosystem
The Paris climate agreement sets a framework for the reductions to begin in 2020. After 2020, the deal will evolve every five years in order to reevaluate the earth’s condition and change the agreement accordingly. The United States going in on the Paris climate agreement was the peak of President Obama and his administration’s environmental agenda. The Obama administration strongly advocated the agreement and even released their own
Climate change has become of the world’s major issue today. The earth’s climate is always changing in a very fast and also in different ways. Climate changes affect our lives psychologically, emotional and also physically. Climate change is defined as a long term change in the earth’s climate, especially a change due to the increase in the average atmospheric temperatures. Due to this change in temperature, a lot of changes has occurred in our environment, these changes include rising sea levels, flooding, melting of polar ice caps, hotter days, colder nights and heat waves. These climate changes plays an important role in shaping our natural ecosystem, our human economics and also the most important, it affects the human race. For
The European Union’s environmental policy is vast and complicated. It applies to every country under the Union’s domain and its criteria must be met for any state wishing to seek membership. The European Union was not the original forerunner in environmental politics; in fact, the United States “took on a leadership role in preparations for the 1972 United Nations (UN) Conference on the Human Environment” (Kelemen 2009). However, in the 1970s (1973 to be specific) as the US pulled away from being the environmental leader the EU emerged with it’s seven ‘Environmental Action Plans’ (EAP) (Pearce 1998). The original aim of environmental policy was very traditional, focusing on protecting species and improving the quality of life but today the underlying aim of the policy “is to enhance natural capital, provide a resource-efficient economy and safeguard people’s health” (European Commission 2013). I will first open with a brief history of the environmental policy, followed by its success and failures using concrete examples and conclude with alterations or alternatives to the policy in order to make it more successful across the European Union.
The Kyoto protocol was enacted in order to address climate change by implementing emission reduction goals. Seeing as anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are a systemic world environmental problem, any individual act has a global effect and; therefore, international cooperation is necessary in order to address the climate change issue in any region. Furthermore, although developed countries have and are contributing the most to greenhouse gas emissions, many developing countries are feeling the negative affects purely due to their geographic location. Because of this cause and effect imbalance, global cooperation is necessary in order for any emission reduction efforts to have any impact.
This chapter argues that “the study of environmental policy lends its self to contribute to several larger debates on the dynamics in EU policy making and the nature of the EU polity.” And also this Chapter is structured into three parts, “the literature review of ‘the emergence of the policy and highlight the turn from integration of domestic theories’, ‘environmental policy performance’, identifying three different perspectives that have been adopted in the literature ‘investigating the level of regulation’, ‘implementation, and effectiveness’”. Finally, “it establishes the link between environmental policy making and the more general process of a European polity making”. First, the emergence and expansion of the policy, moving from ‘”niches to center stage’”, these are directives which were adopted to deal with “dangerous substances, noise and exhaust emission of motor vehicle”. The EU environmental policy spread the idea of covering all environmental media (air, water, soil) and major problem areas (waste, dangerous substances/ chemicals, nature protection). Organized interests, environmental interest groups are shaping the policy agenda in “Brussels perspective” and influence the decision-making process, by using a mix of strategies ranging from ‘political pressure and campaigns for the provision of policy advice and information’. The im...
Over the past decade, as the evidence of climate change became clearer and better understood, a strong international movement for action has emerged. Climate change is a global challenge that does not respect national borders. Emissions anywhere affect people everywhere, therefore, it is an issue that requires solutions that need to be coordinated at the international level and it requires international cooperation to help developing countries move toward a low-carbon economy. The Kyoto Protocol is an important first step towards truly global emission reduction regime that will stabilize GHG emissions, and can provide the architecture for the future international agreement on climate change. International organizations, such as the Kyoto Protocol, truly proves that there will be a positive outcome to not only certain nations, but the global world.
In the modern era, climate change is a variation of weather over a long period of time, and it is the most important and controversial global issue. It is arguable in different positions, especially on science, culture, and politics. These three fields all cause a lot of latent concerns. The science of climate change brings out several harmful phenomenon, such as global warming. With respect to the climate change, the culture of humanity may be changed because the changing climate is the most important key factor of forming today’s human societies. Instead, climate change is now a political issue, which will affect the public attitudes directly. In other words, it means the government tends to review and provide latest information in order to adapt and retard the climate change. Over a long period of time, climate change has been taking place because of human activities that affect the scientific, cultural, and political sides.
Experts argue that in the 21st Century climate change has become one of the most challenging problems. There are many policies, regulations, and social principles that need to be changed in order to make a significant impact on global warming. Though, since climate change is a world wide problem, climate policies need to be made on both a regional and global scale. International agreements such as the Kyoto Protocol set by the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as well policies by the European Union (EU), governments, municipalities, and local NGOs that strife for a better environment, are crucial to changing global warming. Some areas are more sensitive to global warming than others, and therefore people from these areas tend to upkeep their own regional environmental policies more than others. China is the world’s largest growing economy, but one of its major issues has been the dealing with climate change. Nevertheless, one needs to understand that one lives in a world where the climate is changing rapidly, and a world that is interlinked – at the end of the day all humans live under the same roof. The phenomenon of globalization shows how human kind has developed an integrated world with similar views, products, ideas and culture (Al-Rodhan & Stoudmann, 2006). China is the most obvious example of globalization and climate change, and will therefore be interlinked throughout this essay. Since both climate change and globalization are aspects that both have a global influence, one could argue that these two have positive feedback on each other. O’Brien and Leichenko point out that the “processes of economic globalization are modifying or exacerbating existing vulnerabilities to climate change” (O’Brien & Leich...
... of extreme weather and melting ice caps are indicators of global warming. Because these things will affect society, there are important decisions that have to be made in the present as well as in the future to secure people’s lives and lifestyles. The world community is aware of this serious issue and do already prepare for projects to slow down global warming, but they still have to improve. If the world leaders stop worrying about this issue, the future generations could be in danger. The future lifestyles will be affected by the decisions made in the present day. Society has much to improve to save energy and to lower greenhouse gas emissions. There are also small things people can do to help. Individuals can live a life without wasting energy or polluting the environment. Without effort, global warming endangers the quality of life for the future generations.