Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global economy environmental impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The European Union’s environmental policy is vast and complicated. It applies to every country under the Union’s domain and its criteria must be met for any state wishing to seek membership. The European Union was not the original forerunner in environmental politics; in fact, the United States “took on a leadership role in preparations for the 1972 United Nations (UN) Conference on the Human Environment” (Kelemen 2009). However, in the 1970s (1973 to be specific) as the US pulled away from being the environmental leader the EU emerged with it’s seven ‘Environmental Action Plans’ (EAP) (Pearce 1998). The original aim of environmental policy was very traditional, focusing on protecting species and improving the quality of life but today the underlying aim of the policy “is to enhance natural capital, provide a resource-efficient economy and safeguard people’s health” (European Commission 2013). I will first open with a brief history of the environmental policy, followed by its success and failures using concrete examples and conclude with alterations or alternatives to the policy in order to make it more successful across the European Union.
B. BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
Starting with the 1972 UN Convention, environmental politics became a phenomena that swept across the world and the EU was not immune to this contagious excitement and began the process with seven unique Environmental Action Programs (EAP). The first program began in 1973 and had three major points: (1) the prevention, reduction and containment of environmental damage, (2) the conservation of an ecological equilibrium, and (3) the rational use of natural resources. This was a very traditional approach and would be expanded upon in the future but a...
... middle of paper ...
...Plants by 2022." The New York Times, May 30, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/world/europe/31germany.html?_r=0 (accessed March 27, 2014).
Neubacher, Alexander, and Catalina Schröder. "The Move to Renewables: German'ys Nuclear Phase-Out Brings Unexpected Costs." Der Spiegel, June 06, 2012. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-s-nuclear-phase-out-brings-unexpected-costs-to-consumers-a-837007.html (accessed March 27, 2014).
Spiegel, . "The Price of Green Energy: Is Germany Killing the Environment to Save it?." Der Spiegel, March 12, 2013. http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/german-renewable-energy-policy-takes-toll-on-nature-conservation-a-888094.html (accessed March 27, 2014).
European Commission, "Enviornment Action Programme to 2020." Last modified 03 25, 2014. Accessed March 27, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/newprg/.
World Book Advanced. World Book, 2014. Web. 12 March 2014. EPA.
But this meeting mainly focused to make differences towards water management and decarbonizing energy supplies. They also decided the ways in which Paris agreement will be applied and final decisions will be negotiated amongst the parties. Issues related to water transportations, sustainable distributions, innovations for conservation were brought up to be dealt with for a better future. They also talked about utilizing renewable resources and how this policy can be used to promote markets which can help us to improve infrastructure which will help them to accommodate these changes. One of the key topics of discussion was reducing the carbon footprint by limiting the use of personal transportation and innovate ways to increase carpools and the use of public transportation. They also discussed how new technology should be use which is environment friendly that would bring new jobs which will fit into the existing market for an efficient
Shafer, Leah R. "Address on the Energy Crisis (15 July 1979)." Dictionary of American History. Ed. Stanley I. Kutler. 3rd ed. Vol. 9. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 2003. 492-94. U.S. History in Context. Web. 18 Apr. 2014.
Thesis: As the environment encounters damage from increasing levels of carbon dioxide, actions on both governmental and individual levels need to be implemented in order to protect the welfare of future life.
Because of human and nonhuman connections to specific places including knowledge, experience and community, using a sense of place and permanence as a green transnational multilateral initiative could be a successful step towards green democracy and ecological citizenship. Robyn Eckersley offers the suggestion of a constitutionally entrenched principle that would enhance ecological and social responsibility: the precautionary principle. I suggest connecting localized, place-specific boundaries with the principle. This addition is meant to aid in fostering ecological citizenship, expanding the moral community, and creating a responsible society. This addition would also be meant to unite a transnational issue that all nations could agree upon. This would create a binding multilateral principle that would be thoroughly accepting of specific ecological needs and characteristics of specific places.
For every plan to be implemented well it is important to determine the costs of implementation such as those of employing the Renewable Energy technologies. Naomi urges people to rely on the renewable energy as per the German’s help. Klein states, “The gal becomes not to build a few gigantic green solutions, but to infinitely multiply smaller ones and to use policies- as Germanys feed in tariff for renewable energy for instance- that encourage multiplication rather than consolidation” (384). Researchers claim that the analysis of Naomi Klein’s plan seems to be too expensive to the point of making a stop to some of the activities which are in progress at the moment. The estimates of Klein’s plans seem to cost a rough amount of 100 trillion dollars.
First, the structure of the framework strongly supports an extensive analysis of the directive and of the context in which it was formulated and implemented. Second, each element is important when trying to clarify how a policy is created in the European Union and the impact of the policy on businesses. The 'issue' element provides an opportunity to explain the content of the directive. The 'actors', 'interests','arenas' and 'assets' elements describe and illustrate the power play involved in European Union policy formulation and implementation and the place occupied by businesses. The 'information' element demonstrates the ever increasing importance that knowledge has within the European Union and how it can be used by businesses. Finally, the design of a non-market strategy supported by the (IA)3 framework enables a firm to become active and not only adapt to a certain policy but also gain an opportunity to influence the environment within which it is
The European Foreign and Security Policy is a necessary and important part of the European Union. These policies are discussed, drawn up, voted on and put into effect by the European Council. However, to implement a policy the vote within the Council must be unanimous, without unanimity no policy will be implemented . The rule of law in the European Union is essential to many of its actions, both at home and abroad. The rule of law is “that every action taken by the EU is founded on treaties that have been approved voluntarily and democratically by all EU member countries.”...
Our Congress created the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 in order to establish an environmental foundation for mankind. This policy endorses harmony between humans and the vast ecosystems surrounding them. To obtain this goal and provide our future with resources as well, NEPA is separated into two titles. The first title declares the policy in detail while the second title focuses on the Council on Environmental Quality. The CEQ oversees the effectiveness of current methods, the reactions of the environment to those methods, and implements revisions as necessary.
1. The author visited the Netherlands as part of a Study Abroad course: Environmental Planning in the Netherlands.
The EU consists of 28 countries which collaborate in economic, political, cultural and environmental field. Despite the fact that the top news about the EU actions is connected mostly about economic and politics, environment and climate changes are also important topics to the EU. Because of the size of the EU, the EU leaders have broad acres to look after and to control climate changes there. The EU policy on climate changes is very structured, because of its targets, collaborations with other world’s countries and with researchers who are specialists in field of climate changes.
EIA was firstly presented in the United States (US) in 1969 under the National Environmental Policy Act, in order to aid the decision making and planning processes, while in Europe was adopted in 1985 with the name of European Union Directive (85/337/EEC) on Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA Directive (ibidem). Since then it has been amended in 1997, 2003, 2009 and in 2013, although a final comment and approval from the EC is still expected [European Parliament (EP), 2013].
The Lisbon treaty followed the disastrous Constitutional Treaty of 2004 that was rejected in referendums in France and the Netherlands. After a period of reflection, negotiations began for another treaty (Laursen, 2013:9). These negotiations continued for months, after which it was left to the Portuguese presidency to complete the Treaty, and thus the Treaty became known as the Lisbon Treaty. It was signed in Lisbon on 13 December 2007, but only entered into force on 1 December 2009 following ratification problems, particularly in Ireland (Cini and Borragen, 2013:51). Attitudes towards the Lisbon Treaty differ widely (Laursen, 2013: 9). For some, the Treaty simply sets out incremental reforms designed to make the EU more accountable and efficient (Berman, 2012:3). This is demonstrated largely through institutional changes, particularly to the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Council, but also through the Citizens’ Initiative. However, others have attacked it as merely reinforcing the control of the elites over member states and conversely restricting transparency and encouraging secrecy. Furthermore, some believe that such changes have hardly wholly transformed the EU and that the new Union has remained remarkably similar to its predecessor (Cini and Borragan, 2013:51). They argue that the EU is “too distant” from citizens to ever be considered efficient. Once both sides of the argument have been considered, it can be seen that the Lisbon treaty has improved efficiency to a reasonable standard, however the level of transparency in the EU appears to have reduced.
The development of environmental regimes involves a five-fold process. The first process is the agenda setting and issue definition stage, which identifies and brings attention to an issue to the international community. Secon...
...g the Energy Revolution." Foreign Affairs. Nov/Dec 2010: 111. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 21 Nov 2011.