The Ethics of Cloning Humans

720 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Dangers of cloning on human lives

The Ethics of Cloning Humans

Imagine yourself walking down the street, forty or fifty years from now. Everything is normal, there people walking to their destinations. You continue to walk your way, minding your own business, when all of a sudden you realize you are see a lot of the same people more than once. You just take it to mean that there are a lot of people walking in circles. As your day continues you see more and more of the same people. Meeting up with one of your friends you asks, "hey, lately, have you noticed that everyone looks like everyone else?" Your friend looks at you with disbelief, "haven't you been paying attention to the news, and the papers? Everyone, that can afford it, is getting cloned."

The recent cloning of a sheep has people debating the pluses and minuses of that kind of research. Now the debate has changed to whether or not to clone humans. The pros and cons of this project are both important and have to be considered. A lot of people are strongly against this "playing God". In some cases the cloning should be considered. The cloning should only be used to help infertile couples to have children and to find cures for diseases. What would be the point of cloning a model, a singer, or movie star.

Religious leaders and ethical philosophers oppose such human experiments. There is the danger of people playing God, mankind is another step closer to wielding the powers of God. For those who aren't born multiples, there isn't supposed to be another like them. The religious opinion on cloning to cure diseases is a not clear. Would that be qualified as playing God? Should scientist not try to cure Parkinson's or Alzheimer's? I do believe that God wants for the sick to be helped.

The scientific arguments against human cloning were based on the results of animal trials in which mice, the infamous cloned sheep Dolly, and other mammals developed all kinds of unpredictable genetic defects. The potential represented by cloning does not automatically outweighs the risk of unseen con-sequences. There are enough people in this world without "making" more. Maybe they should be more interested in cloning needed things like food. If cloning is completely outlawed then there will probably be no hope for finding the cures for those fore-mentioned diseases.

Show More
Related

  • Is Cloning Ethical or Unethical?

    911 Words  | 2 Pages

    In recent discussions of cloning, a controversial issue has been whether cloning is ethical. On the one hand, some argue that scientists “playing god” by playing creating life However, Scientists argue that cloning is not “playing god” it’s a way to understand and improve human life. They believe god gave them the tools to improve society and increase our chances of survival

    Read More

  • Human Cloning In Frankenstein

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    When a couple has difficulty becoming pregnant and creating another life, many will turn to this kind of procedure. Is this almost the same thing as cloning? Because the process does involve the removal and reimplantation of eggs, very similar to the process that takes place when cloning is performed. If this process is successful, which a lot of times it’s not; on many occasions multiples are created, therefore resulting in twins, triplets and sometimes even more. Is this safe? In my opinion, as long as the patients are continuously monitored by a doctor throughout their ordeal, it can be completely safe. But on the other hand, arguments have been made that when in cloning, if there is a successful clone, still many things with that clone can go wrong. Organs can grow abnormally large, that clone may not be able to reproduce, and because of the unknown effects, that clone may die at an earlier rate than that of a naturally produced human (or animal). So if the topic of cloning goes along with the interest between faith and science, is it to say that any of the scientists that are performing or attempting to perform a cloning procedure that they don’t have any faith? Because many will say that they are trying to play God, messing around with the natural process of the creation of life. Which that is the way life should be; a natural process,

    Read More

  • Cloning In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein '

    1849 Words  | 4 Pages

    His act of science would question if cloning was a practical and morally acceptable thing to do. Firstly, even attempting to clone insults God's role as a creator. Showing full determination, Aldona says, "Christian, however, feel that we have no right to play the role of God, because He is the only one Creator and act of creation depends on Him." (Zbikowska 13-16). We know God's role is to create men, women, animals and nature in his image in the way he sees perfect, not the way we see ourselves as perfect. God has the intention of making us, and when others try to mimic him it deteriorates his role in the world. Aside from the idea that cloning is insulting to God, it can also hurt others. Even though cloning has been developing for the past few decades, it is still a fairly unsuccessful procedure. In most cases, cloning is successful only less than one percent of the time. Moreover,

    Read More

  • The Moral Aspect of Cloning

    1369 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both sides being scientific and ethnical have both very strong arguments. Yes, there are some risks with trying something new and different. But if people didn’t take risks we wouldn’t be were we are today, there wouldn’t be a cure for Polio, or any other diseases. As we become more knowledgeable we are able to find new cures, and new medicines. It makes us think, are we playing God? Or are we just scientists using the mind God gave us? I do not feel that cloning should just be used on an everyday basis; it should be used in moderation. Even though we would have the skill to “raise the dead” we should still treasure the importance of human life.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Human Cloning

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    It is essential that human cloning is outlawed. It is salacious to perform, research, and promote these experiments on human subjects; it is neglectful, and shrewd to make the presence of this objective technology legal, let alone obtainable. Not only is human cloning hazardous and illogical, but morally incorrect and greatly dishonorable. The most alarming thought referring to human cloning is that it has the power to alter the foundation, that we as a nation, are assembled upon. What occurs after we take things too far and lose control? What happens when we are no more satisfied in simply seeking education of the physical universe? We will cross the line between natural and synthetic. What will differentiate God from man? Do we have the authorization to change the evolution of life? Science has proven that we can reproduce humans both naturally and unnaturally, but that does not mean that mean we should stop questioning whether or not we should scientifically reproduce humans.

    Read More

  • Cloning And Individuality Essay

    839 Words  | 2 Pages

    One way this is shown is studies on twins. Twins are much alike clones as in the way that they

    Read More

  • The Cloning Debate

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    Not so far in the future, a young boy of the age of six, dying a heart-wrenching death, will only be able survive with a bone marrow transplant.  His parents will have searched near and far for a match, but none will come to their aid.  The only possible way that they can produce a perfect match for their son's bone marrow is to clone their son.  Unfortunately, at this time this topic is still being discussed and debated upon with the government.  Their only child that has been their treasure for six years might die.  A clone of their son becomes their apple of aspiration to keep the treasure from being buried.

    Read More

  • A Brave New World Quote Analysis

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Brav New World, when one of the students asks what the advantage of cloning is, the director replies, “Ninety-six identical twins working ninety-six identical machines! You really know where you are. For the first time in history. Community, Identity, Stability” (Hexley). This quote predicts that people will be cloned in the future to achieve stability, uniformity, and conformism.

    Read More

  • Reasons to Ban Cloning

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    Last of all, Cloning is not ethical, many religious groups look down upon cloning and think it’s not proper because they think it’s like playing God. Many scientists were mainly thinking about cloning animals and, most likely, humans in the future to harvest their organs and then kill them. “Who would actually like to be harvested and killed for their organs?” “Human cloning exploits human beings for our own self-gratification (Dodson, 2003).” A person paying enough money could get a corrupt scientist to clone anybody they wanted, like movie stars, music stars, athletes, etc (Andrea Castro 2005),” whether it be our desire for new medical treatments or our desire to have children on our own genetic terms (Dodson, 2003).

    Read More

  • Human Genetic Engineering: Unnatural Selection

    1509 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cloning is a process by which genetically equal organisms are created with the same DNA. In simplest terms, clones are like twins born at different times. This procedure poses various dangers to society and humankind. One of the greatest threats this procedure creates is among

    Read More

  • Medical Advances

    1128 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...e" specific traits in people could lead to the "creating" of a specific person, also known as cloning. Although the ability to create people could mean Mother Teresa could be re-created or cloned, this ability also means Hitler could be re-created or cloned. The effects of this power depend upon whose hands the power is in. So, who has the power to play God? This question needs to be answered to decide if many of the latest medical advances are justifiable. Obviously, only God can have the power to be God. Only He truly understands peopleís purpose on earth since He put them there. Court cases and congressional actions are taking place to decide how the United States stands on the ethics of medical procedures. Humans have been working hard to find medical techniques to save life and now all this progress is being reverted, especially through abortions and euthanasia.

    Read More

  • Human Cloning

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    John A. Robertson’s article “Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation” raises three important reasons on why there shouldn’t be a ban on Human Cloning but that it should be regulated. Couples who are infertile might choose to clone one of the partners instead of using sperm, eggs, or embryo’s from anonymous donors. In conventional in vitro fertilization, doctors attempt to start with many ova, fertilize each with sperm and implant all of them in the woman's womb in the hope that one will result in pregnancy. (Robertson) But some women can only supply a single egg. Through the use of embryo cloning, that egg might be divisible into, say 8 zygotes for implanting. The chance of those women becoming pregnant would be much greater. (Kassirer) Secondly, it would benefit a couple at high risk of having offspring with a genetic disease choose weather to risk the birth of an affected child. (Robertson) Parents who are known to be at risk of passing a genetic defect to a child could make use of cloning. A fertilized ovum could be cloned, and the duplicate tested for the disease or disorder. If the clone were free of genetic defects, then the other clone would be as well. Then this could be implanted in the woman and allowed to mature to term. (Heyd) Thirdly, it would be used to obtain tissue or organs...

    Read More

  • Cloning is Unethical

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    Scientists have no problem with the ethical issues cloning poses, as they claim the technological benefits of cloning clearly outweigh the possible social consequences, not to mention, help people with deadly diseases to find a cure. Jennifer Chan, a junior at the New York City Lab School, said, "?cloning body organs will help save many patients' lives," she said. "I think that cloning is an amazing medical breakthrough, and the process could stop at cloning organs--if we're accountable, it doesn't have to go any further." This argument seems to be an ethical presentation of the purpose of cloning. However, most, if not all scientists agree that human cloning won?t stop there. While cloning organs may seem ethical, cloning a human is dangerous. Still, scientists argue that the intentions of cloning are ethical. On the other hand, there are many who disagree with those claims. According to those from a religious standpoint, it is playing God, therefore, should be avoided. From a scientific standpoint it is also very dangerous, as scientists are playing with human cells which, if done wrong, can lead to genetic mutations that can either become fatal to the clone, or cause it severe disabilities. This information does, in fact, question the moral of the issue. If cloning is unsafe and harmful, what is the point?

    Read More

  • Human Cloning Should be Illegal

    573 Words  | 2 Pages

    Human cloning is dangerous. It is estimated that between 95 and 98 percent of cloning experiments have failed (Genetics and Society). These downfalls to cloning are in the form of miscarriages and stillbirths (Genetics and Society). Cloned human beings also run the risk of having severe genetic abnormalities. Children cloned from adult DNA would, in a sense, already have “old” genes. These children’s main problem would be developing and growing old too quickly. This includes arthritis, appearance, and organ function. Since the chance of having a child with mental and physical problems is so much higher than that of a normally conceived child, cloning should be illegal.

    Read More

  • Human Cloning is Immoral

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    "He is nowhere near being in the position he says he is of being able

    Read More

More about The Ethics of Cloning Humans

Open Document