Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human cloning immorality
Ethical issues in reproductive technologies
Ethical implications of human cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human cloning immorality
Ever since the first child was successfully conceived and born in 1978
through In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF), the question on everybody's mind
has been 'Just how far can we stretch the right to create and destroy
human life?'
In the 24 years since IVF's first success, a million IVF babies have
been born worldwide and the technique has become an accepted therapy.
Now, more than ever with progress in assisting in conception, there
has been a great interest in cloning humans. Humans have been cloned,
naturally of course. I am referring to identical twins. Outside of
that, no human has ever been artificially cloned. One attempt at
splitting an embryo in 1993 came very close but was not successful.
Both of the two ways of cloning; splitting an embryo and implanting
genetic cells into an egg, are hard to do, expensive and dangerous,
but offer endless possibilities in medical developments.
Although many scientists think cloning will someday be possible, many
also think it would be unethical to try.
Professor Severino Antinori invented ICSI (Intracystoplasmic Sperm
Injection); the single major breakthrough in the treatment of male
infertility, and his extension of IVF treatment to menopausal woman
resulted in the controversial motherhood of a 63-year-old Italian.
Lord Winston, the Labour peer and infertility specialist refers to
Antinori's progress towards human cloning by saying:
"He is nowhere near being in the position he says he is of being able
to successfully produce a healthy human clone. It is extraordinarily
dangerous, fantastically risky."
(www.observer.co.uk)
Professor Robert Edwards whose work with the la...
... middle of paper ...
...or factor when cloning humans.
Josephine Quintaville is a Pro-life campaigner and director of the
London-based Comment on Reproductive Ethnics (CORE), a pressure group
that opposes human cloning. She said:
"You could never perfect cloning on humans without experimenting on
humans, and that is something that the world has agreed should never
happen again after Nazi Germany."
(www.lifesite.net)
Cloning humans appears imminent. If not to be used in medical
research, or assist in bioengineering children, to help infertile
couples have a baby.
In my opinion, after weighing out the evidence and arguments both
supporting and opposing human cloning, I think it is immoral to create
life, especially to treat cloned humans as tools to 'assist' in
development even though they would be humans just like you and me.
he expressed in the following quote from “The Case of the Negro”; “…the idea should not be to
things do not seem the same to him. The was seems to have put a new spin
sure if he will run or not, and he is scared that he might. He doesn't
... understandable to a wide audience, inviting citizens from all walks of life and levels of education to be engaged. But his arguments are, without a doubt, simplifications and he doesn't even bring up arguments that challenge his own, let alone take them seriously.
He goes on with how in his room he was staying in while in rehab there was a picture of a space shuttle with all the astronauts signatures and at the top it say ?We?ve found nothing is impossible? Reeve goes on to say how that should be our motto and it would be the American motto because one party can?t do this only a nation can do this. He then goes on to say how our dreams seems impossible then they seem improbable and how if we can conquer outer space then we can conquer innerspace
He says the countries bigger problems are the poverty, ignorance, and disease in the country. Johnson sates the only way to cure it is to overcome it. The near end part of speech helps bring the crowd together, and sets a foundation for a bold
... you cannot put words with everything, just feel what is right and go with it. However, he provides a wonderful example of the fact that denying a connection puts one in a situation in which one is likely to make just such a connection without realizing it.
He says that it is harder for him to doubt something deliberate, and the idea that he can have opportunities that are up to him to decide that fate of an outcome. He goes on to say that we must be wiser with our principles and start adjusting our theories to our data and avoid tailoring our data to our theories.
Cloning is the creation of an organism that is an exact genetic copy of another. Every single bit of DNA is the same. There are three different types of cloning. Gene cloning produces copies of genes or fragments of DNA, reproductive cloning creates copies of whole animals, and therapeutic cloning builds embryonic stem cells for experiments aimed at creating tissues to replace injured or diseased tissues. In 1997 scientists in Scotland announced the birth of a clone. Its name was Dolly; after the American country singer. She was the clone of an adult female sheep, and the first mammal to ever be cloned successfully. As Dolly matured, she mated with a ram, and gave birth to a lamb showing that clones have the ability to reproduce. Dolly died at the age of six. According to Sheep 101, the life expectancy for a sheep is 10-12 years, but some sheep can live up to 20 years.
The idea of creating life has intrigued people since the beginning of time. Mary Shelly in her novel Frankenstein brought this idea to life. In this novel, Victor Frankenstein created life by using advanced science and spare body parts. The idea of creating life is a current controversy. Technology now allows for the cloning of sheep. Certainly, the ability to clone humans cannot be far away. It is necessary to place restrictions on cloning research and to ban humans cloning because human cloning is immoral. Furthermore, the expectations placed on a cloned creature by society would be unbearable for the creature, and would lead to its psychological demise.
In the past, cloning always seemed like a faraway scientific fantasy that could never really happen, but sometimes reality catches up to human ingenuity and people discover that a fictional science is all too real. Such was the fate of cloning when Dolly, a cloned sheep, came into existence during 1997, as Beth Baker explains (Baker 45). In addition to opening the eyes of millions of people, the breakthrough raised many questions about the morality of cloning humans. The greatest moral question is, when considering the pros against the cons, if human cloning is an ethical practice. There are two different types of cloning and both entail completely different processes and both are completely justifiable at the end of the day.
Cloning is, and always has been an extremely contentious topic. To some, the ethical complications surrounding it, are far more promiscuous than what scientists and medical experts currently acknowledge. Cloning is a general term that refers to the process in which an organism, or discrete cells and genes, undergo genetic duplication, in order to produce an identical copy of the original biological matter. There are two main types of artificial cloning; reproductive and therapeutic, both of which present their respective benefits and constraints. This essay aims to discuss the various differences between the two processes, as well as the ethical issues associated with it.
Imagine a world where everyone looked like you and was related to you as a sibling, cousin, or any form of relation, wouldn’t that be freaky? Although cloning is not an important issue presently, it could potentially replace sexual reproduction as our method of producing children. Cloning is a dangerous possibility because it could lead to an over-emphasis on the importance of the genotype, no guaranteed live births, and present risks to both the cloned child and surrogate mother. It also violates the biological parent-child relationship and can cause the destruction of the normal structure of a family. The cloning of the deceased is another problem with cloning because it displays the inability of the parents to accept the child’s death and does not ensure a successful procedure. Along with the risks, there are benefits to Human Reproductive Cloning. It allows couples who cannot have a baby otherwise to enjoy parenthood and have a child who is directly related to them. It also limits the risk of transmitting genetic diseases to the cloned child and the risk of genetic defects in the cloned child. Although the government has banned Human Reproductive Cloning, the issue will eventually come to the surface and force us to consider the 1st commandment of God, all men are equal in the eyes of god, but does this also include clones? That is the question that we must answer in the near future in order to resolve a controversy that has plagued us for many years.
Just the thought that he may be King clouds his thoughts and ambitions.
Can you imagine a world where everyone looked the same and had the same DNA? This could become true due to the advances in science in the field of cloning. We are coming into an age where scientists have started cloning non-human mammals as well as fish. Soon, they will want to start cloning humans. Since human cloning is so dangerous, unethical, and too expensive for reproductive purposes, it should be illegal.