Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Spoon river anthology full text
Spoon river anthology full text
Spoon river anthology contents
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Spoon river anthology full text
An epitaph is a poem or short story that is dedicated to someone who is deceased. Edgar Lee Masters’ collection of poems located in the book Spoon River Anthology contains over a hundred epitaphs. Each of these poems is named after a person, but only five poems are named after actual people. Masters would take some names from the constitutions and state papers of Illinois and for other names, he would choose a first name from one person and a surname from another. Each story is unique, but many intertwine with one another; one example of this is the epitaph for Fletcher McGee. The poem, “Fletcher McGee” described a man’s relationship with his wife and how it had changed over time. The epitaph for Fletcher McGee is about how he had loved his …show more content…
wife, but then he had begun to abuse her. Although it is not stated in the poem, it can be assumed that Ollie McGee is his wife by similar information in their epitaphs and the same surname. Their relationship is also described in the articles “Spoon River Anthology” and “The Genesis of Spoon River”, which portray Ollie as Fletcher’s spouse. These characters are the only two characters within the poem, as is shown through the pronouns “she” and “my” that are used throughout the poem. Although it is an epitaph for Fletcher McGee, the story within it is about his wife. This is shown in the article “Spoon River Anthology” it states that “placed immediately after “Ollie” the epitaph of Fletcher McGee, her husband, from the fifteenth garland, giving his side of the story”. After reading Ollie’s side of the story, the reader sees Fletcher’s, in which he tells the story from his perspective. This story includes how he had loved his wife, but how after she passed, she had begun to haunt him. The beginning of the poem shows how much Fletcher had loved his wife. This is shown by how he describes her. Near the beginning of the poem he says “She took the pity from my heart, And made it into smiles” (Masters). This is describing how she had made him happy. He also compared the time to a shadow; shadows are always there, but they are rarely noticed. From this, it can be assumed that time went by unnoticed when he was with her. Although it is shown in the beginning how much he had loved her, the happy tone it had created soon turned into a more serious tone.
This began when he compared her clay and his secret thoughts to his fingers. He was implying that he was changing her with his secret thoughts. These secret thoughts can be assumed to be abuse by the way he describes her saying his fingers “set the lips, and sagge the cheeks, And drooped the eyes with sorrow” (Masters). Someone with a black eye can be described as having a drooping eye. With this in mind, and the later statement that it was a “face she hated And a face I feared to see” it can be assumed that he was abusing her until she hated to see herself. When he says that it was a face he feared to see, he means that he is resentful of what he had done and she was a constant reminder. This is shown by the final two lines of the poem which state “And then she died and haunted me, And hunted me for life” (Masters). What he had done to her had haunted him after her death and he believed that she was seeking revenge, as is shown through the use of the word “hunting”. It is known that people can change over time, and this is true for relationships as well. In the case of Fletcher McGee and his wife Ollie, they had a loving relationship that turned into one full of violence and resentment. Although Fletcher says that she had haunted him and hunted him after her death, by dedicating his epitaph to her and his remorse, it does not make the fact that
he had abused her disappear.
This is a deviation from the typical sonnet in the sense that the usual speaker is a male character praising the body of a lover, feature by feature. The breakdown of the body is one aspect that remains present in this sonnet; “when your mouth is an absence of screams” (Line 11). The metaphor use shows that at this moment she did not have a voice; she did not yet have a way to call out for help or express her emotions in this very early stage in the healing process. The moment after the assault is when the healing process begins; the sonnet expresses the emotions that she could not speak of at the time. The speaker calls attention to the eyes of the subject with the phrase, “your eyes’ salty runoff,” (Line 2). This metaphor is used to compare the tears that are running down her face to the small rivers that are drowning her. This suggests that she is being overwhelmed with emotions that she cannot put a name to. The typical sonnet examines the female body in a loving manner but Alleyne examines her body with a negative approach to amplify the wrongs that were committed against her
“Pass On” written by Michael Lee is a free verse poem informing readers on grief, which is one of the most difficult obstacles to overcome not only when losing a loved one, but also in life itself. “Pass On” successfully developed this topic through the setting of an unknown character who explains his or her experience of grief. Despite Lee never introducing this character, readers are given enough information to know how they are overcoming this difficult obstacle. In fact, this unknown character is most likely the writer himself, indirectly explaining his moments of grief. One important piece of information Lee provides is the fact that he has experienced loss twice, one with his grandfather and the other a friend who was murdered by the
The first two lines of the poem set the mood of fear and gloom which is constant throughout the remainder of the poem. The word choice of "black" to describe the speaker's face can convey several messages (502). The most obvious meaning ...
The imagery in this passage helps turn the tone of the poem from victimization to anger. In addition to fire images, the overall language is completely stripped down to bare ugliness. In previous lines, the sordidness has been intermixed with cheerful euphemisms: the agonizing work is an "exquisite dance" (24); the trembling hands are "white gulls" (22); the cough is "gay" (25). But in these later lines, all aesthetically pleasing terms vanish, leaving "sweet and …blood" (85), "naked… [and]…bony children" (89), and a "skeleton body" (95).
Nature, that washed her hands in milk” can be divided structurally into two halves; the first three stanzas constitute the first half, and the last three stanzas make up the second half. Each stanza in the first half corresponds to a stanza in the second half. The first stanza describes the temperament of Nature, who is, above all, creative. This first stanza of the first half corresponds to stanza four, the first stanza in the second half of the poem. Stanza four divulges the nature of Time, who, unlike Nature, is ultimately a destroyer. Time is introduced as the enemy of Nature, and Ralegh points out that not only does Nature “despise” Time, she has good reason for it (l. 19). Time humiliates her: he “rudely gives her love the lie,/Makes Hope a fool, and Sorrow wise” (20-21). The parallel between the temperaments of Nature and Time is continued in stanzas two and five. Stanza two describes the mistress that Nature makes for Love. This mistress, who is made of “snow and silk” instead of earth, has features that are easily broken (3). Each external feature is individually fragile: her eyes are made of light, which cannot even be touched, her breath is as delicate as a violet, and she has “lips of jelly” (7-8). Her demeanor is unreliable, as well; it is made “Only of wantonness and wit” (12). It is no surprise that all of the delicate beauty Nature creates in stanza two is destroyed by Time in stanza five. Time “dims, discolors, and destroys” the creation of Nature, feature by feature (25-26). Stanzas three and six complete the parallel. In the third stanza, the mistress is made, but in her is “a heart of stone” (15). Ralegh points out that her charm o...
Throughout his life... was a man self-haunted, unable to escape from his own drama, unable to find any window that would not give him back the image of himself. Even the mistress of his most passionate love-verses, who must (one supposes) have been a real person, remains for him a mere abstraction of sex: a thing given. He does not see her --does not apparently want to see her; for it is not of her that he writes, but of his relation to her; not of love, but of himself loving.
The speaker seems very bitter towards a female. If we suppose that the speaker is Sappho, it seems that she is angry at another female who does not share the roses of Pieria or -in other words- she does not belong (any more or at all) in her circle. Unlike the deceased that were honored after their death by a funerary epigram, the addressee of this poem is not deceased. Sappho wants to let her know that she will not be honored after her death, probably, by her poetry. In this way she will be forgotten by the living. Sappho seems to engage in a literary play with some of the conventions of funerary epigrams. Nevertheless, there is also something else that should not be left unnoticed. We know that many of the curse-tablets were placed in graves. It may be not an exaggeration to claim that Sappho seems to reconstruct the occasion of a funerary epigram for a living woman and to try to engrave it in a non-existing grave. We also know that in many curse-tablets there was the intention of the practitioner to control the afterlife of the victim. In fragment 55 V we can discern Sappho’s wish to exercise control not only on the memory of the victim, but also on her afterlife: she warns her that she will be anonymous even among the
There are a couple of similes the author uses in the poem to stress the helplessness she felt in childhood. In the lines, “The tears/ running down like mud” (11,12), the reader may notice the words sliding down the page in lines 12-14 like mud and tears that flowed in childhood days. The speaker compares a...
Not only the words, but the figures of speech and other such elements are important to analyzing the poem. Alliteration is seen throughout the entire poem, as in lines one through four, and seven through eight. The alliteration in one through four (whisky, waltzing, was) flows nicely, contrasting to the negativity of the first stanza, while seven through eight (countenance, could) sound unpleasing to the ear, emphasizing the mother’s disapproval. The imagery of the father beating time on the child’s head with his palm sounds harmful, as well as the image of the father’s bruised hands holding the child’s wrists. It portrays the dad as having an ultimate power over the child, instead of holding his hands, he grabs his wrists.
picture of her. During the poem he describes in a sly sort of way why
... feared time. At times he seemed as if he was angry at the fact that time went by too quick and not enough time allowed him to spend summer with his beloved. Other times he spent glorifying how beautiful his beloved one was and how the beauty can’t ever be taken away. It makes it difficult for the audience to take his reason serious at times because at one point in the poem he seems to have contradicted himself. I found out that this poem had a portion of metaphors, similes, and imagery and personification throughout the entire poem. He begins the poem with a simile and ends it with a personification on the poem.
Throughout Emily Dickinson’s poetry there is a reoccurring theme of death and immortality. The theme of death is further separated into two major categories including the curiosity Dickinson held of the process of dying and the feelings accompanied with it and the reaction to the death of a loved one. Two of Dickinson’s many poems that contain a theme of death include: “Because I Could Not Stop For Death,” and “After great pain, a formal feeling comes.”
In conclusion, Gray’s “Elegy Written in a Country Churchyard” uses symbolism and dubbal entendre throughout the poem to convey the inevitability of death, mourning, conflict within self, finding virtue in one’s life, dealing with one’s misfortunes and giving recognition to those who would otherwise seem insignificant to those of greater statures.
Funeral Blues by W. H. Auden is a short poem that illustrates the emotions that he is dealing with after the love of his life passes away. The tone of this piece evokes feelings that will differ depending on the reader; therefore, the meaning of this poem is not in any way one-dimensional, resulting in inevitable ambiguity . In order to evoke emotion from his audience, Auden uses a series of different poetic devices to express the sadness and despair of losing a loved one. This poem isn’t necessarily about finding meaning or coming to some overwhelming realization, but rather about feeling emotions and understanding the pain that the speaker is experiencing. Through the use of poetic devices such as an elegy, hyperboles, imagery, metaphors, and alliterations as well as end-rhyme, Auden has created a powerful poem that accurately depicts the emotions a person will often feel when the love of their live has passed away.
Katherine Philips is desperately trying to renew her faith in life, but she is struggling to do so because of the death of her son. She is attempting to justify the loss of her child as a form of consolation, while keeping somewhat emotionally detached to the later death of her stepson in “In Memory of F.P.” The differing phrases, words, and language contrast the two elegies and emphasize the loss and pain in “Epitaph” while diminishing the pain in “Memory of FP.”