Often differences and similarities between people may be obvious but more often their relationships can be difficult to recognize. “The relationships of individuals to the societies in which they live vary widely with time and place”. (Blair Nelson from the syllabus for assignment Essay Exam 1).
Clovis the King of the Franks was a king from the 9th century who laid the foundation of England; a 12th century Southampton merchant who sold agricultural products, wine from France, wool and a variety of goods sought by the wealthy; the serf, a mere peasant bound to work and serve the manor ruled by the lord. These three different individuals when compared to each other so different being from different levels of this middle-age social and economic ladder yet “are related to their communities and the larger society”. (Blair Nelson from the syllabus for assignment Essay Exam 1).
Despite their differences these three people, King Clovis, the Southampton merchant, and even the lowly serf played a significant role to society in general. Although these three people related to their community in different ways, all three of these people related to medieval society in general in a way that led to its formation.
History books tell us that Clovis became chief of his tribe in the year 481 when he was 16 years old. Despite his youth Clovis was a savvy leader and a powerful warrior but was also very ambitious, killing all of his potential political rivals and taking over their tribes. Beginning his campaign to take over Gaul in 486 he defeated the army of Roman general Syagrius and occupied the city of Soissons. With this Clovis had almost complete control over Gaul and he proclaimed himself King of the Franks. Clovis the King of the F...
... middle of paper ...
...nett and Hollister, pgs. 167 & 174 and Andrea, pg. 248)
In conclusion, While Clovis King of the Franks, the serf and the Southampton wool merchant each related to their individual communities in their own way, yet related to medieval society in general in a way that shaped it into the society we study today. It’s interesting how people can be so different socially and economically yet can still have an effect on society as a whole.
Works Cited
Andrea, Alfred J. The Medieval Record: Sources of Medieval History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.
Bennett, Judith M. & Hollister, C. Warren. Medieval Europe: A Short History. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2006.
Nosotro, Rit. “Clovis: 465-511 First Christian King of the Franks.” Hyperhistory.net.
Last Updated: 12/22/09. Date Accessed: 3/20/10
Davis gives various examples of the social norms that peasants lived under during the sixteenth century. When Sanxi, Guerre’s father, and his family decided to leave their village, Davis states that the majority of men who leave their village do so because they “were usually not heir to their family’s property, as was Sanxi Daguerre, but younger brothers who could not or would not remain in the ancestral household” (Davis 6). This highlights the idea that being the heir to the family’s inheritance is a great indicator of how one’s life as a peasant would carry on. It is very likely that if one is the heir, then the individual shall stay at their property and assume the role as head of the household once the “s...
In The History of the Franks, Gregory of Tours portrayed Clovis as a leader who, although his conversion to Christianity appeared to be genuine, nonetheless, used his conversion to realize his political aspirations. By converting to Christianity, Clovis, according to Gregory of Tours’ narrative, was able to garner the support of Christian leaders such as Saint Remigius and, consequently, gain powerful political allies. Moreover, as a result of his conversion, Clovis became a king who was more attractive to orthodox Christians. Furthermore, Clovis’ conversion provided him with a reason for conquering territories that were not ruled by orthodox Christians. Thus, Clovis was able to bring additional territories under his command without resistance from local orthodox Christian leaders and with a degree of approval from the orthodox Christian masses as he, in essence, took on the Christ-like role of savior and liberator who relieved the orthodox Christian masses of flawed leadership from “false” Christians, pagans, or the morally inept. Interestingly, it seems that Clovis’ alleged behavior was not entirely unique as parallels and discrepancies exist between Gregory of Tour’s account of Clovis’ conversion to orthodox Christianity, his depiction of Gundobad’s conversion, and Eusebius’ description of Constantine’s conversion.
The evolution of human society consists mainly of ineffective ruling regimes and oppressed peasants. Medieval Europe falls into this same pervasive cycle. Social and political hierarchies intertwine which creates a grossly inefficient system. Hereditary lineage determines nobility. Commoners possess no hope of social mobility. Every aspect of life is virtually preordained. These circumstances revolve around the figure Lanval by Mari de France. Mari de France introduces Lanval as a courteous and distinguished knight of King Arthur’s court. Lanval possesses the most moral nature of all of King Arthur’s knights, yet even so, the other knights of King Arthur’s round table despise him. The many knights neglect acknowledgment of his nature as does
Lanval’s initial introduction to the reader is one that focuses solely on his emotional and physical isolation from the rest of the Arthurian world as “he was far from his heritage” (27-28) and forgotten by King Arthur upon the king’s lavish distribution of “wives and lands” (17) to his “members of the Round Table” (15). The king’s knights are depicted as a “company with no equal in all the world” (16), a description which excludes Lanval. Consequently, the use of the word “company” in this account of his contemporaries is particularly significant as its multiple definitions a...
people to base there values and way of life on. During the 1400's knighthood was coming
Sometimes alike and sometimes different, through these differences I have noticed that perspective on different cultures can be easily changed, by learning and getting to know them. Through the similarities I have noticed that all different kinds of culture can somewhat all relate to each other. Each one of them prospered in a time they didn’t know would end. And began when they didn’t know that we would be learning about them today. Differences and similarities don’t mean much when you get to know each of these interesting culture’s. All of them have contributed to the people we are today such as a small thing like using cacao beans for chocolate, to big architectural discoveries. In the end these civilizations are not so different or similar as one might
During the medieval times the social status and the rank of the citizens where very important in determining the obligations and restrictions of the people. When citizens jumped social class or stepped out of line, it was looked down upon by the other citizens. In the Knights tale some of the social class stereotypes are broken by characters such as Kate, William and Joselyn.
...n Society In Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
The development of social classes in medieval England affected life for the people in many positive ways. It served as a means of organization to base their daily lives off of, and also gave the peasants and trade classes protection from the rulers and the clergy class in return for their labor and allegiance (“Quizlet”). Life in the Middle Ages was based on the framework of social classes so they could flourish socially and economically.
Many things effected society in Medieval Europe, some having a more profound effect than others. Europe in the Middles ages was a time of learning and of cultural growth, but it was also a time of more serious things such as the Black Death. The way Europe coped with these unforeseen challenges, helped shape their society and culture, and we still learn about them today.
Shawna Herzog, History 101-1, Class Lecture: 11.2 Society in the Middle Ages, 27 March 2014.
Ruth Benedict’s anthropological book, Patterns of Culture explores the dualism of culture and personality. Benedict studies different cultures such as the Zuni tribe and the Dobu Indians. Each culture she finds is so different and distinctive in relation to the norm of our society. Each difference is what makes it unique. Benedict compares the likenesses of culture and individuality, “A culture, like an individual, is a more or less consistent pattern of thought or action” (46), but note, they are not the same by use of the word, “like.” Benedict is saying that figuratively, cultures are like personalities. Culture and individuality are intertwined and dependent upon each other for survival.
February 2014. http://faculty.history.wisc.edu/sommerville/361/361-02.htm. Sommerville, J.P. Economy and Society in Early Modern England. The "Social structure" of the. February 2014.
Polanyi (1957) defines medieval craft guilds as “socially embedded economic institutions”. This definition clearly identifies the prominent role that guilds played starting from the early twelfth century, when they were first mentioned in official documents (Keutgen, 1965; Wissell, 1971).
Most people within the Middle Ages did not move or go anywhere very often. If you were born somewhere during these times, you most likely to stay there till your death. This idea matters greatly in the scheme of Feud...