Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Parents influence on child sexuality
Homosexuality in religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Same-sex marriage is something that is not currently accepted by most of society, especially in Catholics, Christians and others. In the decade of 1970 begin to emerge in the United States marriages of the same sex. Today there are many views, which are analyzed on same-sex marriage. It has been considered through the impact it could have on children, in religions as well as in the freedom and equality in society. Today there are many studies which show that children of same-sex families are healthier and have better care than children of different- sex marriages. These studies are based on the assumption that in every home where love reigns, understanding and respect, a child always will have well educated. In the year 2008 President Barack Obama gave a speech, where support same-sex marriage. However, there is a large majority in society that says that children of same-sex couples are negatively motivated by family architectures in that have grown. Households with different-sex marriages are those that the government continues to recognize as the ideal home for marriage, these...
Gay marriage further damages the connection between marriage and parenthood by causing people to not consider marriagement just to be a parent. He later on argues that marriage has been a tradition since the beginning of time and everything supports it. “The family, led by a married mother and father, is the best available structure for both child rearing and cultural health. This is why, although some people will always pair off in unorthodox ways, society as a whole must never legitimize any form of marriage other than that of one man and one woman, united with the intention of permanency and the nurturing of children” (Colson
Same sex marriage may seem, to some, a crazy idea as marriage in this country is built on the foundation of a man and a woman marrying, but Sullivan points out that until recent centuries marriage was a contract into which a woman entered so that she would be controlled by her husba...
Bos, H. M., Van Balen, F., & Van den Boom, D. C. (2007). Child adjustment and parenting in planned lesbian-parent families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 38-48. doi:
In today’s society, family structure has changed dramatically from the traditional nuclear family to the unconventional, such as single parenting or same sex families. Over the years, many individuals questioned whether or not a parent’s sexual orientation affected their child’s sexual preference. There is significant research that has shown that children with lesbian parents do not differ from children with heterosexual parents. Many individuals stated that it is the value of the parent’s relationship with the child and not the parent’s sexual orientation that affects the child’s development. Contrary to the popular belief, children raised by lesbian parents are not more likely to become gay than children who are raised by heterosexual parents. A parent’s sexual orientation has said to have little importance to children other than the family togetherness. In other words, the relationship of the parent and child is far greater important than the sexual orientation of one’s parents. To be a good parent to a child has nothing to do with one’s sexual preference, but how well one takes care of that child emotionally, physically, financially, and mentally. Before the 20th, century children were often seen as miniature versions of adults so there was little consideration to children development in cognitive and physical development. The interest of child development did not peak until the early 20th century. Conscientious parenting happens not only within traditional nuclear families, but also within homosexual families. Both traditional nuclear and homosexual families can have positive and negative effects on children’s cognitive, psychological or behavioral development due to their rearing.
In recent years, same-sex relationships have become more encompassing in US society. State legislation is changing such as accepting gay marriages, enforcing anti-discrimination laws, and legal gay adoptions; the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community is becoming public. Gay-headed families, like heterosexuals, are diverse and varying in different forms. Whether a created family is from previous heterosexual relationships, artificial insemination, or adoption, it deserves the same legal rights heterosexual families enjoy. Full adoption rights needs to be legalized in all states to provide a stable family life for children because sexual orientation does not determine parenting skills, children placed with homosexual parents have better well-being than those in foster care, and there are thousands of children waiting for good homes.
An argument is sound when it is valid and has all true premises. The legitimacy of the first premise depends on what context it is taken in. If taken in its individual sense, that gay people just by themselves cannot naturally have biological children, then the first premise stands some contradiction. However, gay people can have babies through natural processes like insemination or adoption. There are a large number of orphans who need the essentials of life, including but not limited ...
Adoption has been a high successful practices it is benefit to the children and the parents studies have shown but what if it was a not the average family, is there a different outcome? Same-sex couples adoption compared to heterosexual couples adoption, does this becomes a cause in the child’s mental development. Adoption affects the social, behavior, emotional, and academic learning of children. Over the years the data that has been collected shows that more and more same-sex couples are starting to adopt. Some many worry that the child will be affected and damage will happen causing the child’s mental development to be affected. Research shows that the child’s mental development does not differ from being adoption from a same-sex couple compared to a heterosexual couple.
Since the 1970s, studies on the effect of same-sex parenting on children have been conducted in the United States. Sociological debates have occurred from the idea of allowing same-sex couples to parent. Some groups feel that allowing this would undermine the traditional ideology of marriage and skew the perception of gender roles for their children. Sociologists continue to produce empirical research that studies samples of the approximately 125,000 same-sex couples raising nearly 220,000 children and comparing their roles as parents and the adult personalities of their children to children raised by heterosexual couples. Current scientific research comparing the outcomes of children raised by gay or lesbian parents with children of heterosexual parents consistently shows that same-sex parents are just as capable of raising “psychologically healthy and well-adjusted” children as heterosexual parents. Research comparing children raised by same-sex couples and heterosexual couples found no differences in the adjustment or mental health of these children as adults.
Marriage naturally creates families; it provides the conditions for a healthy environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa...
Child marriage is defined by the UNICEF as “a formal marriage or informal union before age 18”. Forced marriage goes hand in hand with child marriage because children rarely have the capacity to resist. Both girls and boys are victims, although girls more so than boys. There is not much research about the impact of child marriage on boys because girls feel the biggest impact of it. Child marriage was a common and widespread practice in the past for many reasons—politics, financial security and shorter lifespans are some of the most well-known. It severely limits the future of girls, endangers their health, makes them more susceptible to domestic violence, and in developing countries, detracts from the workforce. Despite these things, it is
In our society today, homosexuals have been broadly acknowledged by the majority of the people. According to Jonas Bagas, the social attitudes and behavior of the Filipinos about homosexuals and same sex marriage are changing wherein the Social media has major access to a wider range of narratives and stories about LGBTs and made them part of our experiences, creating an environment that could help dismantle the oppressive stereotypes about homosexuality. It shows that the social media has changed the perception of the Filipinos on how to deal with issues that have been filtered and controlled in the past by traditional institutions, like the Church and the schools, thus it makes them more openness to engage in an issue that is considered as a taboo. In addition, various LGBT groups have been made that are actively promoting and advocating for homosexual rights and to maintain that society will not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference. However; when homosexuals begun suggesting the legalizing the same-sex marriage many controversies and arguments arises. In fact, this issue received a lot of protest and disapproval because it opposes the adapted meaning of marriage based on the Catholic teaching that states that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Though there were already more than a dozen countries which have accepted legally formalizing marriage between same sex marriages like Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France etc. But majority of countries still do not recognize this same sex marriage including the Philippines. However, Polls in different countries show that there is an increasing support for legally recognizing same-sex marriage.
Families of same sex marriages are not the optimum environments to raise children. Children who are raised in a same sex environment are more inclined to pick up their parents sexuality and lifestyle. Children should be raised in a heterosexual environment, which is biologically correct. Children should not be brought up with a predisposition to be homosexuals or lesbians. The purpose of marriage is to protect our children not our sexual preferences.
Over the last years the topic of same-sex marriage has been of great importance to our society. The idea of the same gender being lawfully married is disturbing to a group of people but in the recent years the number of supporters has increased. The cases that argue for the legalization of same-sex marriage are focusing on the relationship of the individuals and do not see anything in same-sex marriage that could harm our society as a whole. The article “How the President go to ‘I Do’ on Same-Sex Marriage,” published by Joe Becker in April 2014, explains how Barack Obama started saying that he was undecided about the subject matter but is now leaning toward the legalization of same-sex marriage. The subject matter takes a lot of analyzing of what pros and cons are to come from the legalization of same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a global argument that deals with unifying two individuals of the same gender under the law. The main reason that supporters give for justifying same-sex marriage is that it is for the same reason as straight people, to show love and commitment to each other. Furthermore, the argument of same-sex marriage is difficult to generalize because of the multiple factors that need to be taken in consideration when making any decision regarding this topic. Although Becker does have true premises, he lacks clarity in his terms which make his argument be false and invalid.
Discrimination is defined according to Joseph Healey (2014) “as the unequal treatment of the persons based on group’s membership”. Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender are considered minority groups because they are only few percent of them in the society. “The majority (57%) of the attacks motivated by the sexual orientation of the victim were directed against male homosexuals (FBI, 2012)” this can be found on page 165 of our textbook. This topic is important because while reading the chapters, I noticed that the textbook didn’t really say much about this minority group.
This introduces the clarity and resolution of three group’s civil union, traditionalist and liberals. The three groups have different opinions on same-sex relationships but all use a Christian opinion on the topic. Liberals and Traditionalist have been divided between the profound opinions over same-sex relationships. The realization is that the groups will never agree on the issue, but people hope they will find a way to live together. No doubt this issue is causing a division in churches and society. The more neutral group is the civil union it gives more of an open minded argument and shows both sides of the story. Marriage is something understood in the bible and followed by a lot of the society today. All the groups have strong points of views, but they all have different perspectives in the issue over homosexuals and same-sex marriages.