Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Suicide sociological perspective
Suicide sociological perspective
Controversies over same-sex marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Annie Nguyen Mr. Montalbano AP Language and Composition, Period 4 24 February 2016 “Gay Marriage” : Societal Suicide Meaning Questions 1. What is Colson’s Thesis? Where does he state it directly? Colson’s thesis is directly stated with “Marriage is the traditional building block of human society, intended both to unite couples and bring children into the world” (Colson 567). His whole essay is refuting how gay marriage can affect the lives of teenagers and children. Those kids who are from broken homes have a higher percentage of getting into trouble or being in the wrong crowd. He expresses the importance of how it is important to have a family with a mom and a dad so that children can get a good “cultural health”. 2. What evidence does Colson present to link same-sex marriage to an increase in out-of-wedlock births? to link single-parent households to increase in crime, early parenthood, and other problems of young people? How effective do you find this evidence? Colson’s evidence to …show more content…
link same-sex marriage to an increase in out-of-wedlock births, to an increase in crime, early parenthood, and other problem of young people is that he has been a ministry for 30 years. Throughout those years, he claims that he has witnessed the many “consequences for a family breakdown”. He also brought up studies to support his link by stating, “Boys who grow up without fathers are at least twice as likely as other boys to end up in prison. Sixty percent of rapists and 72 percent of adolescent murderers never knew or lived with their fathers. Even in the toughest inner-city neighborhoods, just 10 percent of kids from intact families get into trouble, but 90 percent of those from broken families do. Girls raised without a father in the home are five times more likely to become mothers while still adolescents. Children from broken homes have more academic and behavioral problems at school and are nearly twice as kiely to drop out of high school” (Colson 567). Basically, children from broken homes do not get the support needed from both a father and a mother and so they have a higher chance of straying from the good things. 3. What other argument does Colson make against same-sex marriage? Colson argues that gay “marriage” does weaken heterosexual marriage quoting, Stanley Kurtz, “It follows that once marriage is redefined to accommodate same-sex couples, that change cannot help but lock in and reinforce and the very cultural separation between marriage and parenthood that makes gay marriage conceivable to begin with” (Colson 567).
Gay marriage further damages the connection between marriage and parenthood by causing people to not consider marriagement just to be a parent. He later on argues that marriage has been a tradition since the beginning of time and everything supports it. “The family, led by a married mother and father, is the best available structure for both child rearing and cultural health. This is why, although some people will always pair off in unorthodox ways, society as a whole must never legitimize any form of marriage other than that of one man and one woman, united with the intention of permanency and the nurturing of children” (Colson
568).
He also discusses how love and the desire for commitment play a big part in the argument for and against gay marriage. Stoddard begins his argument successfully with pathos, or emotional appeal, to attain the reader’s empathy for those who have been deprived of a loved one. The story tells of a woman named Karen Thompson, who was basically married, but not legally, to her female partner; when Thompson’s partner was in a critical car accident, her partner’s parents completely cut Thompson off from all contact with their daughter. Had the two women been married, they would not have had to deal with such heart-throbbing pain. This example is effective in presenting how marriage “can be the key to survival, emotional and financial” (Stoddard, 1988, p. 551).
In the essay “Why The M Word Matters To Me” by Andrew Sullivan, he states “This isn’t about gay marriage. It’s about marriage. It’s about family. It’s about love” (159). A student’s response to this statement made by Sullivan prompted him to claim that Sullivan was not speaking about marriage itself - as a concept, more rather weddings in particular within his essay. I fully agree with this student’s response and as a result, I shall be thoroughly analyzing the validity of his claim outright.
In his essay, "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide", he argues that "Marriage is the traditional building block of human society, intended both to unite couples and bring children into the world"(Colson, pg. 535). He also states that "The family, led by a married mother and father, is the best available structure for both child rearing and cultural health" (Colson, Pg. 535). There is no doubt about this. A family with one mother and one father is the most ideal family structure. Unfortunately, this ideal doesn’t correlate really well into real life. There are millions of families in the United States made up of many different family structures. While they may not be the ideal structure, that doesn’t mean that they are not the best structure for the child. Colson is an idealist. Pollitt is a
Why the family is considered the most important agent of socialization? What caused the dramatic changes to the American family? What are those changes? Describe the differences in marriage and family life that are linked to class, race, gender, and personal choice. Do you feel the trend toward diverse families is positive or negative? If the trend changed toward traditional (pre-World War II) families, how would that affect women’s rights?
...ist then goes on to cite the research that it described as suffering from “serious methodological problems” for its next two points. The list points to low birthrates in countries where same-sex marriage is legal, as though it can prove in that way that allowing LGBT couples to marry decreases the number of children born in a country.
In Bennett’s essay, he does not want to support gay-marriage so he provides evidences as to why it is a bad idea. In his opinion, marriage is a connection of a husband and a wife. On the other hand, gay marriage is a damage of this society because he doesn’t think same sex marriage is actually a marriage. First of all, he believes “same sex marriages would do significant, long term social damage” (Bennett 177). At this point, I don’t agree with him because in my opinion, gay people do not harm the society except decreasing population in a passive action but it is not the main deterioration to be long term or significant. As everyone knows, beside gay marriage, abortion is also the hot issue of the world especially with the religion today. Why do they have to get rid of their “blood”? When they love each other so much, they get married or have sex before marriage (it’s very normal with teenager today), and then when the love is broken, they decide to abort or in other word, they want to kill their ba...
As the world grows, society is constantly changing people and their beliefs become more accustomed to what was unfamiliar in the past. There were times when old opinions and views clashed with the new, even amongst loved ones. In “Say Yes” by Tobias Wolff, two different views on marriage come to light between husband and wife during a usually insignificant evening at home. Aside from the subject of the argument, the husband’s perspective on his treatment towards his wife portray what their society’s expectations of a man and woman roles were. The contrast between this married couple depicts a few of many controversial issues society has had to approach and eventually “Say Yes” to. Once the wife realized how little her husband knew about her, she slowly creates a distance between them and she doesn 't cooperate with him like he wants and expects her to do.
Is marriage strictly between male and female, or should it also be open for homosexuals? William Bennett, a well known politician believes in the traditional marriage, being between a male and female. His thesis reads “We are engaged in a debate which, in a less confused time, would be considered pointless and even oxymoronic: the question of the same-sex marriage” (409). Not only is this statement bias, but other elements of his work held problems. The way his case was defended was ineffective to his case. The debate held good statements; it just failed to support the statements. His writing also holds other unacceptable elements, giving his work more reasons to be ineffective. William Bennett’s debate “Against
Nock SL. 1995. A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. J. Fam. Issues 16:53 76
Lisa Miller uses the Bible as a basis for her argument for gay marriage in her essay "Our Mutual Joy: The Religious Case for Gay Marriage". She first begins her argument by saying that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament show model examples for marriage. Therefore, neither a homosexual or heterosexual couple would want to look to the Bible for marriage advice. Instead, the Bible should be read for its universal truths. Miller goes onto say that there is no real definition of marriage in the Bible, and the laws and guidelines in the Bible were put in place for a culture that no longer exists. If Christians no longer subscribe to animal sacrifice, then why would they condemn homosexuality? She ends by discussing the fact that Jesus ' message was one of inclusion. So, all those who claim to follow the Bible 's teachings should love others regardless of their sexual orientation.
...at to the stability of family life in our society. Sexual intercourse, explained by Haines (2011), is a special bond that is created for the aim of reproducing children despite not being able to, at times. It unites two dissimilar body parts in a way that can produce a reproductive effect. Thus, same sex relationships are opposed because male-female relationships are the only sort that can fully embrace the sexual complimentary (Haines, 2011). If we de-emphasize the procreative function of marriage, then it is only focused on the intensity of feeling between married couples (Pinkerton, 2014). Pinkerton (2014) said that no matter how deep and intimate one’s feelings may be, it can decrease after many years of raising children. This would ultimately lead to divorce and broken families which threatens the stability of family life in our society as stated earlier.
“Today, about one in every three U.S. births occurs outside of marriage. The proportion of births to unmarried women has risen monotonically over time, and attitudes toward non - marital fertility have become progressively more tolerant” (Musick, 2002, p. 915). Sometimes these births are planned and at other times they are not. “Dramatic increases in cohabitation and associated delays in marriage have changed the composition and character of non-marital births. Unmarried mothers now tend to be older, to have other children, and to be living with a partner at the time of their child’s birth” (Musick, 2002, p. 915). What significance does this have to your research? What does it prove? Why did you include it?
The main points of the Symbolic Interactionism perspective is that symbols are what shape how we communicate and how we view the world. Our changing ideas affect how we understand and view different things around us. Without symbols society would be not be very coordinated, people wouldn’t be able to specify a specific time for school or where to meet for lunch. The main points of the Functional Analysis perspective, is that society is made up of several individual parts that work together for society to function properly. Each of these smaller parts has functions that are beneficial consequences of people actions and dysfunctions that are harmful and threaten the equilibrium. In this perspective the smaller parts are look at to see how they
Marriage naturally creates families; it provides the conditions for a healthy environment that is beneficial to the upbringing of children. Opponents of same-sex marriage often ground their arguments on parental and religious concerns. Many argue that sa...
Over the last years the topic of same-sex marriage has been of great importance to our society. The idea of the same gender being lawfully married is disturbing to a group of people but in the recent years the number of supporters has increased. The cases that argue for the legalization of same-sex marriage are focusing on the relationship of the individuals and do not see anything in same-sex marriage that could harm our society as a whole. The article “How the President go to ‘I Do’ on Same-Sex Marriage,” published by Joe Becker in April 2014, explains how Barack Obama started saying that he was undecided about the subject matter but is now leaning toward the legalization of same-sex marriage. The subject matter takes a lot of analyzing of what pros and cons are to come from the legalization of same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage is a global argument that deals with unifying two individuals of the same gender under the law. The main reason that supporters give for justifying same-sex marriage is that it is for the same reason as straight people, to show love and commitment to each other. Furthermore, the argument of same-sex marriage is difficult to generalize because of the multiple factors that need to be taken in consideration when making any decision regarding this topic. Although Becker does have true premises, he lacks clarity in his terms which make his argument be false and invalid.