Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversies over same-sex marriage
Controversies over same-sex marriage
Controversies over same-sex marriage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversies over same-sex marriage
In our society today, homosexuals have been broadly acknowledged by the majority of the people. According to Jonas Bagas, the social attitudes and behavior of the Filipinos about homosexuals and same sex marriage are changing wherein the Social media has major access to a wider range of narratives and stories about LGBTs and made them part of our experiences, creating an environment that could help dismantle the oppressive stereotypes about homosexuality. It shows that the social media has changed the perception of the Filipinos on how to deal with issues that have been filtered and controlled in the past by traditional institutions, like the Church and the schools, thus it makes them more openness to engage in an issue that is considered as a taboo. In addition, various LGBT groups have been made that are actively promoting and advocating for homosexual rights and to maintain that society will not discriminate on the basis of sexual preference. However; when homosexuals begun suggesting the legalizing the same-sex marriage many controversies and arguments arises. In fact, this issue received a lot of protest and disapproval because it opposes the adapted meaning of marriage based on the Catholic teaching that states that marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Though there were already more than a dozen countries which have accepted legally formalizing marriage between same sex marriages like Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France etc. But majority of countries still do not recognize this same sex marriage including the Philippines. However, Polls in different countries show that there is an increasing support for legally recognizing same-sex marriage.
Same sex marriage is also known as gay marriage wherein it is a m...
... middle of paper ...
... to death. Their blood shall be upon them. It only shows that Bible condemns homosexuality as an immoral and unnatural sin. In addition, the bible also says that in the first Corinthians 6:9 states that homosexuals are unrighteous and will not inherit the kingdom of God, thus both homosexual desires and actions are condemned in the Bible, that is why it is clear that same sex marriage is not God’s will, and if this issue will become legalized, the image of the Philippines as a Christian country will be demolished.
To sum it all, various kinds of people are fighting for their right to be recognized as equal. There may never be an actual answer as to who is right and who is wrong but equality for all is definitely necessary for all.
Both sides of this argument have one strong belief in common and that is doing what they believe is right and best for society today.
Doesn’t equality mean equal? The world gets offended at everything, but wants to continue to judge people based off of the same thing that offends them. If an immigrant goes into an airport, they will get searched—no doubt. If a white man walks into an airport, his chances of being flagged down are slim-to-none. Everyone should be treated with equal rights and respect.
Indeed, as we have already observed, it is contrary to God’s law. God’s love for homosexuals is no less than His love for the liar, the thief, and the pedophile. He sent Jesus into the world and then revealed his life and teaching and the purpose of his death and resurrection through the gospel, in order that you and I might be saved from our sin. The conditions for ALL sinners are the same: You must believe in the Lord Jesus, repent of your sins and be baptized (immersed) in water for the forgiveness of your sins (Acts 2:36-38). After which, you are raised to walk in the newness of life (Romans 6:1-14).
In Making All the Difference: Inclusion and Exclusion in American Law, Martha Minow outlines five unstated assumptions about the dilemma of difference and special privilege. The dilemma of difference is based on the idea that the identity of recognizing differences threatens the idea that we are all the same. In other words, the idea that everyone is the same leads to formal equality. The dilemma of difference is also about the “unstated point of reference,” which is when there is a failure to recognize difference as a problem. For example, Mari Matsuda’s experience of not being allowed into the store illustrates how it is problematic to recognize difference
Equality and equal opportunity are two terms that have changed or have been redefined over the last 100 years in America. The fathers of our constitution wanted to establish justice and secure liberty for the people of the United States. They wrote about freedom and equality for men, but historically it has not been practiced. In the twentieth century, large steps have been made to make the United States practice the ideals declared in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The major changes following Rosa Park’s refusal to give up her bus seat to a young white man and the Brown v. Board of Education trial in 1954.
Society is created with both homosexual and heterosexual individuals. Previously when certain laws discriminated against others, such as law for women's rights to vote, these laws were changed. Changing the traditions of the country does not mean that it will lead to the legalization of other extreme issues. Each ...
Why does it matter? Why do humans harp on the topics of justice and equality consistently? The answers to above mentioned questions aren’t easy to formulate, and they open up a door to greater questions about morality, humanity and so forth. Humans live in a cooperative society. The aim of this body of organization is to advance as a whole and individually simultaneously. John Rawls’ states this goal of human society in Distributive Justice published in 1979: “We may think of the human society as a more or less self-sufficient association regulated by a common conception of justice and aimed at advancing the good of its members.” Hence, our society is shaped by an idea of justice – one that is applicable to all members of this society, and this set conception of justice promotes the advancement of the society and the individuals living in
the beginning the text has an exciting tone since the authors describe the overwhelming emotions of individuals as well as the celebrations that took place after the law allowing same sex marriage was approved. By starting the article in this manner the writers are trying to provoke feelings of excitement from their readers in order to make them think that this event is a positive aspect of our society. Also, by mentioning the gay movement’s multiple efforts over the past “forty-two years to ensure the marital as well as civil rights of homosexuals” (Virtanen, Hill, and Zraick 1), the writers motivate their audience to be sympathetic towards these individuals. Moreover, the authors try to make people become more suppo...
equal before the law and must be treated as individuals. With the mass media rarely recognizing
Love always plays an indispensable role in our life while lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders are found in all age groups, all social classes, and all nations. Thus, it is obvious that homosexual marriage is one of the most biggest concerns. However, in contemporary life, some people are far more open-minded and support to this issue. Particularly, there are twenty-one countries which legalize same-sex marriage. This kind of marriage should be respected and accepted like heterosexual marriage. In spite of objections, this essay will highlight the main reasons that homosexuals should have equal right to marry.
Gay marriage is currently legal in a small percentage of counties worldwide. For many, marriage is seen as a unique relation between a man and woman, with the purpose of having and raising a family. In the past, interracial couples faced complications when they attempted to marry. However, nowadays some same sex couples are on the same path to legal and social acceptance of gay marriage, that interracial couples face. However, gay marriages need to be recognized by the government in order for the couples to enjoy all of the rights and responsibilities generally given to marriages of the opposite sex couples. There are no significant restrictions of marriage that include race or religion. Gender is currently the only defining characteristic required for couples to be legally married in most pl...
Likewise also, the men, leaving the natural use of the woman burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. This quote states that the lust for another man and leaving behind the woman, who is made for man, is a sin and it shall be punished. Those who feel homosexuality is wrong feel that we should “say no” to these sinful desires and choose what is right in the eyes of God. According to them, there are more than a dozen passages in the Bible that state the sinfulness of homosexuality.... ...
We have no right to judge. We should leave that to the Lord, and he will make the right decision. He will decide what the sinner does and doesn't deserve. Christians know what to abide by. They may know that being a homosexual is going against Gods word, but they also know that the Lord says that one should love all no matter what circumstances.
The recognition of same-sex marriage is a political, social, and religious issue. Because of this same-sex marriage is a very controversial topic. Legal acknowledgement of same sex marriage is commonly referred to as marriage equality. Many advocates of marriage equality argue that laws restricting marriage to only heterosexuals discriminate against homosexuals. On the other hand advocates against same-sex marriage argue that it would undo long-standing traditions and change the meaning of marriage in a damaging manor. In this essay I will be arguing for same-sex marriage. The arguments mentioned as well as others will be discusses throughout this paper.
Many Christians have never fully read the bible and base their understanding of it on word of mouth. Looking at it closer, one would notice that many parts of the bible are not of any use or are mostly rejected in today’s society, which is why we should reevaluate its teachings and revoke any that are no longer needed. Even the Pope has gone against scripture that is unacceptable in our world today. “If they accept the Lord and have goodwill, who am I to judge them?” This is a quote from Pope Francis, stating that as long as a person does good, who is anyone to judge them. In the Old Testament it says, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.” (NKJ, Leviticus 18:22) and “If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.” (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13) Not only do these quotes condemn homosexuality they illustrate the lack of equality due to the lack of representation of women in the law. In the New Testament, Jesus never directly mentions homosexuality, but instead condemns all forms of sexual immoral behavior. “What comes out of
Gay marriage is such a hotly debated topic cause of the religious ties (thieves). Homosexuality has always been look down upon in the church (thieves). Also in the muslim community homosexuality is looked down upon and punishable with death(thie...