You are starving and your family is starving, but the law told you that you could not feed your family, would you obey the law or do you decide to feed your family anyway despite what the law says? To Tommy Pikok Sr., “When I am hungry, I can protest the law. I can use my stomach as a reason to protest the law” (Edwardsen, Duck-In). In the documentary, The Duck-In, the Iñupiat people of Barrow, Alaska fought against the law by coming together as a whole community to get what should be their right as native people. The Iñupiat people would rather hunt for their food than consume white people food on a daily basis. It is our culture, tradition, and duty to hunt for food and no one or anything could change our way of thinking. The citizens of Barrow, Alaska should watch the Duck-In because the documentary informs the citizens …show more content…
of Barrow, Alaska that the Iñupiat fought for our hunting rights, the documentary describes what life was like back then, tells how unified the North Slope was, and lastly, the documentary makes us want to take pride in our culture. Hunting to some people is just a fun activity and gives parents a chance to bond with their kids, but to the Iñupiat people of Barrow, hunting is something the Iñupiaq people have to do in order to survive. Back then, before Alaska became a state, the native people did not have a store to buy meat from, the family had to go out and hunt for their food and that is what the people of Barrow continued to do for years. They lived according to the laws of their ancestors and harvested the animals. However, when the game warden came up to Barrow in 1961, hunting ducks would come to an end. The game warden would arrest people who had ducks that were caught off-season and in the documentary, Pasty Aamodt said that, “It seemed unthinkable to be arrested to be able to have duck soup.” (Edwardsen, Duck-In) From the documentary, two people were arrested, the first person arrested was John Nusunginya and the second person was Tommy Pikok Sr. or also known as, Nipik. Pikok stated in his interview, “I went to see the game warden (back at the hotel) and told them to arrest me” (Edwardsen, Duck-In). As a result of the arrests, 138 people of Barrow shot and killed ducks showed up to the game warden’s door and told the game warden to arrest them all. The game warden claimed that he did not have enough paperwork to arrest all 138 people, and then the game warden left them alone. Also, about 300 people of Barrow signed a petition to change the regulation law and sent it to the president. The law said that duck hunting season was October, but no ducks were in Barrow during that month. The Inupiat people were determined to get rid of the law, it does not matter in what way, and they wanted the law gone. Tommy Pikok Sr. had fighting words that had drawn attention to him by the game warden, “But I also warned them I said: ‘If I get out of jail, if I ever come home and find my children and my wife hungry and skinny… I’m telling you now, that if this happens I will use all my monies, down to the last pennies to look for you, where ever you may be. And I will kill you and feed you to my dogs.” (Edwardsen, Duck-In) The documentary is a great history lesson about Barrow.
In the documentary, there are several photos from 1961, and even before then. There were photos of the houses the native people used to live in, the old Top of the World Hotel, pictures of families that were associated with the Duck-In, and even photographs of newspapers that were written about the hunting law. Included in the documentary, before Eben Hopson and Sadie Brower passed away, the film and editing crew added old conversations from them and incorporated the conversations into the documentary. Clips of life back then were included in the video, which involved people gathered around outside eating and sharing food. Beverly Long explained that, “How you grew up, they cannot take that away from you,” (Edwardsen, Duck-In) and Long also said, “It is so important we know who our ancestors are” (Edwardsen, Duck-In). What Long said about the past could make you realize that if it was not for your ancestors, tradition would not carry on and the things you do today, such as hunting, sewing, cooking, and speaking the language, would all be gone if your ancestors did not carry on those
ways. Living in such a small place, unity plays a huge part in a community, once one person goes down, everyone else follows, and that is how the people of Barrow got the law overridden. In a place like the North Slope, you cannot survive being by yourself, there needs to be someone who has your back and in the Duck-In, the whole town was involved. When Pikok almost got arrested, the community of Barrow had a plan and the plan was to have people shoot and kill ducks and the wives, children, and men joined in on the action. If someone did not catch a duck, someone would be more than happy to give that person one. After that, a total of 138 people had a duck and started off to the game warden. The people knocked and knocked on the game warden’s door, but no one answered. The native people thought that he ran away because he could not arrest them all. Furthermore, the villages got in on the idea too, Ahkiviana stated, “We are considered as one, as the Inupiat people of the North Slope. We are eight villages and we are one, all together we represent one group of people. If something goes wrong at Barter Island, we all get together and come to their aid. If Point Hope needs our help, we have to help them. The same with Anaktuvuk Pass, Nuiqsut, Wainwright, and Barrow; we are a group of people, together as one person. We help each other as Inupiat, living life together.” (Edwardsen, Duck-In) As an Iñupiaq person, you should have pride in who you are. The people in Barrow back in 1961 would not let the white man take their culture away from them. Without pride, how does a person know who they are? In the Duck-In, the Iñupiaq values were shown, such as humor, family roles, hunter success, and cooperation. Humor was expressed when the 138 people with ducks in their hand came knocking the game warden’s door to arrest them all; family roles were expressed when the men in the family are responsible for catching food for the family; hunter success was shown when the community of Barrow changed the law of the hunting seasons, and cooperation was shown throughout the whole documentary, from the first arrest, to the second arrest, to making a plan that involved the whole community to participate. If the Iñupiat people did not take pride in their culture and traditions, the Iñupiaq values would not even be around, and the people would not have been able to change the law. Etok Edwardsen, who witnessed the Duck-In, said, “…that’s the first time I saw Eskimo power at play,” (Edwardsen, Duck-In) which he later explained was the best feeling that you would ever feel. The 1961 Duck-In is an important aspect of the history of Barrow. It was a time when people’s lives were at risk because families were scared they could not hunt ducks for food, a time when the Iñupiat people came together as one to fight the law, and a time when taking pride in your culture could overpower the United States government. John Nusunginya and Tommy Pikok Sr. were not the only heroes in this story; it was also the community of Barrow. If the people did not react the way they reacted when those two men got arrested, who knew what the hunting laws would be like now. The citizens on Barrow, Alaska should watch The Duck-In because the documentary educates us that the hunting laws we have now, were fought for, it informs us what Barrow was like back then, the documentary teaches us that the North Slope was unified, and it makes us want to take pride in our culture. Always remember that, ““We are the Inupiat. We are hunters. The Arctic is our home” (Edwardsen, Duck-In).
Weisiger’s narrative explains the relationship of “livestock grazing, environmental change, cultural identity, gender, and memory during the New Deal era of the 1930s and its aftermath” (p xv). Weisiger relies on oral histories, environmental science, and government documents. Weisiger begins by discussing the debate about the Stock Reduction Program from 1933-1934. She goes on then to detail the importance of livestock to Navajo cultural identity and way of life. Weisiger writes, “Dine knew nature not only through their connections with the physical environment but also
Bridge to Freedom provides the historical documentary behind the events that served as the narrative for Selma. Instead of a drama, the viewers receive an actual documentary that shows the confrontations between the marchers and the government. Like Selma, it highlights the violence, the deaths, and the beatings, but also goes further back in time to show society’s treatment of African Americans.
“Tracing a single Native American family from the 1780’s through the 1920’s posed a number of challenges,” for Claudio Saunt, author of Black, White, and Indian: Race and the Unmaking of an American Family. (pg. 217) A family tree is comprised of genealogical data that has many branches that take form by twisting, turning, and attempting to accurately represent descendants from the oldest to the youngest. “The Grayson family of the Creek Nation traces its origins to the late 1700’s, when Robert Grierson, a Scotsman, and Sinnugee, a Creek woman, settled down together in what is now north-central Alabama. Today, their descendants number in the thousands and have scores of surnames.” (pg. 3)
Policies are often put in place without regards for the effect it will have on other areas, people, or wildlife. Several examples of these unintended consequences are shown in the documentary Salmon: Running the Gauntlet, which explains the effects that human activity, dams, and attempts to repopulate the salmon species have been implemented and failed. With proper evaluation at the onset of a major project, these severe consequences may be avoided.
We Still Live Here, a film by Anne Makepeace, is about the reclamation of the Massachusetts Wampanoag language by the linguist Jessie Little Doe Baird, the creator of the Wampanoag Language Reclamation Project. The film illustrates the hardships and struggles in which Jessie Little Doe Baird and her colleagues had to go through, translating ancient Wampanoag texts, reuniting members of contemporary Wampanoag communities, and reclaiming the language itself.
Throughout the US, millions of POC students exposed to the traditional, rather outdated version of US History. Never do the textbooks explicitly mention and/ or explain the terrorizing, constant stripping down of others’ cultures and appropriating it into the dominant group of predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon and protestant. For many Mexican American students, they can’t relate to anything in the text, nor do they share an interest in the coursework provided. The way US history sets up doesn't teach and somehow excludes Indigenous backgrounds or for the most part was never taught in the classroom but, rather briefly mentioned in one or two paragraphs. Immigrants from diverse groups built this country yet their culture is consistently shown
Blackfish is a 2013 documentary attempting to elevate public awareness regarding the orca that are being kept in maritime amusement parks, specifically SeaWorld, and the inherent danger of their captivity. The film is effective because it raises a set of important ethical questions for the viewer while presenting with a necessary fact-based style of documentation that does not evoke gratuitous scenes of abuse in order to inspire sympathy, unlike some of the other films that are intended to raise awareness about animal abuse.
How would you like to be abducted from your family and locked in a bathtub to live out the rest of your days and be used as a source of entertainment? That is exactly what happens when an orca is captured, which is disgusting and pure evil. The Documentary Blackfish by Gabriela Cowperthwaite helps depict the horrors that orcas face while in captivity and reveals the ugly and hidden side of SeaWorld. Blackfish does a great job at showing what SeaWorld has been hiding and really makes you hate them. The main focus of Blackfish is on an orca named Tilikum who was captured off the eastern region of Iceland when he was two years old. Tilikum was first sent to Sealand where he was constantly getting attacked by the other orcas, which made him very
Through Deaf Eyes is a documentary conveying various aspects of Deaf life, such as school, culture, and deaf history. It was filled with information and provides a great overview. Although my reactions varied throughout the movie, I really enjoyed it. The parts about how segregation impacted the black and white deaf communities interested me; I hadn’t considered how that would affect deaf culture.
I watched the documentary called, “The Power of an Illusion: The House We Live In”. The documentary talked about how the laws and policies in America create a racial divide; in addition, the documentary talks about how our federal housing policy has oppressed people of color throughout our culture. This was an interesting documentary that certainly talks about how our policies and laws in America have always been to benefit the whites and to exclude people who are non-whites.
“In all of us there is a hunger, marrow deep, to know our heritage - to know who we are and where we came from. Without this enriching knowledge, there is a hollow yearning. No matter what our attainments in life, there is still a vacuum, emptiness, and the most disquieting loneliness.” These words of Alex Haley truly expressed to me personally the imperative need and importance of my family history and heritage. As I believe, family is a gift often cherished, but few take the time to discover and thank those who planted the roots from which a family grows. To express gratitude to my ancestors who planted such roots I have travelled back to discover the past and configure the life of my great grandfather, August Baier.
Students at the University of Missouri, specifically the Concerned Student 1950 activist group, began a resistance movement to remove the university’s president, Tim Wolfe. The university saw a rise in the number of racist incidents, but the president did not take any action. Some of the racist incidents include “a swastika, drawn in excrement” and the “screaming of racial insults, including the ‘N-word” at the head of the Missouri Students Association (“Missouri”). The students began protesting by standing in front of the president’s car at a parade, but when that didn’t garner a response they began to resist in more extreme methods. Jonathan Butler, a graduate student at the University of Missouri, went on a hunger strike, refusing to eat until the president, who took little action against the racist incidents, chose to resign. Hunger strikes, much like abortions, are a form of resistance that can be categorized by inward violence. After a week without food, Tim Wolfe resigned and Butler was able to end his hunger strike (Lowery). The students at Missouri were able to use resistance successfully to create a change in their university’s leadership. Not only did they succeed in changing the leadership, but they gained the attention of the entire nation. Their actions are causing citizens all around the country to think about existing
mean it in a different point of view. A good example of this is the
The discussion of hunger in places within the America is not surprising. They opened the film with images of a food deserted small Colorado town with no visible minorities for the public to be aware of the reality. It’s the reality that even the richest country has its own population full of people that are starving and food insecure without the knowledge of where they will get their next meal. They also opened this to show the world and compare the uptown, high society of the America to those who travel miles to get the groceries that
The French documentary Babies shows the first year of development of four different babies who live in four completely different environments. The film follows Ponijao, a little girl from Namibia, Bayar, a little boy from Mongolia, Mari, a girl from Tokyo, and Hattie, a girl from San Francisco. Even though the babies live in very dissimilar parts of the world, their physical, cognitive, and social development seem to all follow a set pattern. On the other hand, the babies learn to do some activities distinctive to their environment by watching their parents and siblings. Therefore, Babies provides evidence to support both the nature and nurture sides of the debate.