Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employee relations case studies
Employee relations case studies
Essay on nobility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Employee relations case studies
Employee is the most important asset in an organization. Good management of a company ensures all employees are treated with dignity. However, there are barriers that avoiding the situation from happening. One of them is nepotism. Nepotism which derived from Latin word “Nepot” can be defined as unprofessional act that shows favoritism to the relatives (Wikipedia, 2011). Nepotism usually occurs in business management and political affairs but what will be discussed here is nepotism in business company management. Nepotism can contribute to lots of disadvantages to an organization such as unfairness to other employees, lower employees’ morale and pressure to the relatives themselves.
First and foremost, the disadvantage of nepotism is unfairness to other employees (Kinsman, 2006). The feeling arises because employer shows favoritism only to the relative’s workers. There is possibility that non-family employees will feel disappointed and biased when they are treated like that. Management who practice nepotism will always make their relatives prior than other employees (Encyclopedia, 2006). Some example of unfairness would be biased while positioning job or task to employees unfairly during reward and benefit distribution. There is significant relationship between unfairness with employees’ motivation that influences the downward or upswing of motivation level by the employees. At the same time, conflict may arise between the staffs who are previously worked in the company and the new member of staff who has been hired because of the family relationship. So, it strongly can be as a disaster to the company and the company itself because they will be difficult to work each other. As we know, to gain or maximize the profits for the comp...
... middle of paper ...
...ure to the relatives. The situation becomes worse especially when the company manage by family group where the practice of nepotism will simultaneously be inherited to the next management generations. So, employers must play their role in preventing this unprofessional act from becoming a norm practice in management. Moreover, an organization can gain benefits like professional management and good teamwork can be created when all the employees are treated with dignity and fair.
Works Cited
http://www.enotes.com/management-encyclopedia/nepotism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nepotism
http://www.iaes.org/conferences/past/philadelphia_52/prelim_program/d00-2/laker-williams.htm
http://familybusiness.about.com/od/managementandoperations/a/commonthreats.htm
nepotism/info_8778191_nepotism-private-sector.html
http://www.jobjournal.com/article_full_text.asp?artid=1792
This will affect both the employees and the employers by changing the employer’s level of management. They could have been one of the top managers in the company but will get put onto the lower management along with everyone else. This will make everyone on the same level. (Texas)
...oration instead of a family, which is crucial since the employees will not only consider themselves as members of the family but also the employees employed by HHMC
But what exactly is nepotism? The word derives from the Latin nepos, meaning nephew. Durin...
Organizational Institutions has three major elements of institutionalized organizations, first the organization reflects it’s institutional environmental in the behavior and structure, conferring to this elements this organizations are first and foremost in the service of the public. Therefore, complications in the organization environment are reflected as organizational difficulties instead, police departments as a example are often under pressure, and sometimes even under strict commands to hire more minorities or to cultivate the demographic in there organization. On the other hand, if the department fails to use the rational hiring procedures they can end up being sued, even though they would like to hire more educated officers instead. However, the police organization replies to these types of complication throughout, the elaborate hiring policy and formal promised that are negotiated between different organizational groups. Secondly, to keep a p...
For the employer, the disadvantages come in the form of higher wages, strikes and decreased human resource control. Many unions negotiate workplace rules that promote and protect workers based on seniority, rather than merit. It means that if you need to terminate a number of workers, you must terminate those workers you’ve hired most recently, not those workers who are the least productive (Ashe-Edmunds, 2014). The concept affects the efficiency of the organization, which directly affects profits.
The social hierarchy is important and members of the society are expected to conform. One way is showing respect for one’s elders, for example, the oldest member of a group is served first and their drinks are poured for them (AngloINFO, 2014). This mentality is common in the business world as well. Promotions are usually based on seniority and people often work at one company their entire lives. This way of life brings satisfaction and pride to the people (Aliasis, 2013).
Managing employees, the distribution of power is not distributed optimal the way I see it. It would be if most managers were ready for that type of job but they aren’t. Not being ready for a job where you lead people hurts the people under the manager. The way that this can be changed if the workers above the mangers really train and prepare them to actually be a manager instead of just moving up the employee who does great at their job, because you can be a good worker and not a good
The glass ceiling is an invisible barrier preventing women and minorities from advancing into upper management (Bell 67). Despite extensive legislation and the widespread implementation of equal opportunity policies, there is still widespread structural inequality and job segregation in organizations throughout the United States. "The level of the `glass ceiling' varies among organizations and is reflected in different employment patterns, hiring practices, and promotion plans" (Adler 451). The purpose of this paper is to provide background as well as a more in-depth analysis of the glass ceiling phenomenon and apply a human-capitalistic theorist perspective to the issues.
A negative work environment can make employees feel irritable, anxious and defensive. This can cause poor productivity, lack of motivation and poor communication in the workplace which in turn can cause problems for the company. An employer’s abuse of power can cause mental or emotional distress on employees and also disrupt the workplace. Examples of employers abusing their position include humiliation, undermining, disrespectful language, discriminatory comments, yelling and intimidation. When employees are surrounded by this on a daily basis it can affect their self-worth. Employers can resolve these issues by allowing open lines of communication and by not giving employees the impression that it is acceptable to act negatively and disrespect fellow employees.
In conclusion, there are many rights to the employees’ when it comes down to equal opportunity employment. In this paper you learned of a few different types of discrimination towards employees’ and how different acts protect them in the workforce. It also has shown what rights a person has as an employee in the working environment.
In cultures that value loyalty to the employer, a kind of family relationship seems to develop between employer and employee. It is a reciprocal arrangement, which the employer is concerned with assisting the employee to develop to his or her full potential and the employee is concerned about optimizing the welfare of the company. The negative aspect to absolute loyalty to one company is that an employee may stay in one job that he or she has outgrow and may miss out on opportunities to develop in new directions. From the employer’s point of view, the employee may be burdened with employees whose skills no longer match the needs of the company.
A business is as good as the human component that makes it up. It is the employees who add the value of service into the business that the organization engages in turning it into a component that is worth something economically. This therefore calls for the regarding of employees not as a cost of production rather as a factor of production (Gunderson, 2001). While this appears easy theoretically, one has to keep in mind that employees are human beings. In humans, there reside a lot ofambitions, goals and temperaments. This means that each employee will bring in a different dynamic that another employee may not have. To illustrate this, one employee may be loyal to the company and work well into old age; another may stay with the company until
The goal on gender equality and impact of gender discrimination varies from country to country, depending on the social, cultural and economic contexts. Anti-discrimination laws have performed a critical role in expanding work place opportunities for women, yet they are still denied full equality in the workplace. Even though they can now secure powerful professional, academic and corporate positions once reserved for men, the ever present glass ceiling still deters the advancement of large segment of the female workforce (Gregory, 2003). Interest in the careers of females remained strong among both scholars and practitioners. Women have made considerable progress in entering the managerial ranks also but not at the highest levels. However, the promotion of women who hold top management positions increased only slightly during the last decade (U.S. Department of Labor, 1992). Shrinking gender differences between men and women in job related skills and aspirations may not reduce employer discrimination that is rooted in the belief that women’s emotions prevent them from managing effectively (Kanter, 1977). Stumpf and London (1981) identified criteria that are commonly used when decisions are made about management promotions. The specified job-irrelevant criteria, such as gender, race and appearance, and job-relevant criteria, such as related work experience, being a current member of the organization offering the position, past performance, education and seniority.. The central question is whether the hiring, development, and promotion practices of employers that discriminated against women in the past have been remedied or continue in more subtle forms to impede women’s advancement up in the hierarchy
Work plays an important role in our daily life, it is considered much more huge part of our personal life. During our daily work we make many relationships throughout our career history. Sometimes these relationships become lasting, and sometimes employment discrimination might happen. This relationships that we thought it last could be cut off by the devastation of claims of discriminatory treatment. Discrimination in the workforce has been an issue since the first people of workers in United States in the present day and as well in the past. Some employees were subjected to a harsh working conditions, verbal abuse, denial of advancement,, and many other injustices. There was also the fact that certain employees were being treated differently than other employees.
The gender gap in representation of top management positions is a controversial, historic, social, and economic topic. A gender gap is defined as a discrepancy in opportunities, status, and attitudes between men and women. In the present day, there are persistent questions on whether the gender gap exists in top management positions of corporate organizations. This research paper is arguing that a gender gap does exist within these top management positions. Firstly, women are continuously facing barriers that prevent them from reaching the top of corporate hierarchy. Secondly, there is a persistent disparity in wage compared to men and women in the upper echelons of corporations. Finally, a social attribute of discriminating women, excludes