Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explaining the difference between management and leadership
Explaining the difference between management and leadership
Explaining the difference between management and leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The terms Management and Leadership have been used interchangeably in so many cases over the past years. Many people think that Managers are automatically leaders whilst Leaders on the other hand are naturally seen as Managers. The lack of knowledge of the differences between the two processes and how to integrate both to achieve excellence has led to many organisations being under led and over managed. Some Leaders and scholars therefore believe it is important to make a distinction between the processes of management and leadership. One of such scholars is Peter Drucker, a management guru who distinguishes the two processes as “Management is doing things right; Leadership is doing the right things”. Whilst agreeing with him, I also want to add that Management and Leadership must go hand in hand because in modern times, “People no longer look to their managers just to assign them a task but to define for them a purpose, to nurture skills, develop talent and inspire results” (Murray, n.d.). In the next paragraphs we will look at the difference between Management and Leadership through the lens of Peter Drucker’s distinction.
Management is defined by Mary Parker as “the act of getting things done through other people”. Gardener defines a Manager as “an individual, who holds a directive post in an organisation, presiding over the processes by which the organisation functions, allocating resources prudently and making the best possible use of people” (Komives, Lucas, McMahon, 1946). Leadership on the hand is defined by Matusak (1996) “as a process which entails initiating, guiding and working with a group of people to accomplish a change”. A Leader is therefore “an individual who induces a group to pursue objectives held by the l...
... middle of paper ...
...eferences
Forte, T. B. (Producer), Porro, R. E. (Writer), & Washington, D. (Director). (2007). The Great Debaters [Motion Picture].
Komives R. Susan, Lucas Nance, McMahon R. Thimothy. (1946). Relational Leadership. In N. L. Susan R. Komives, Expolring Leadership (pp. 33-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lynch, W. (1970). Lets Make a Slave. Black Arcade Liberation Library, 1. Retrieved on 15th Aprill, 2014 from www.blacology.com
Maccoby, M. (2000, 1 1). Understanding The Difference Between Management And Leadership. Research Technology Management, 43(1), 57-59. Retrieved on 15th Aprill, 2014 from htpp://www.tamarackcommunity.ca
Murray, A. (n.d.). The Wall Street Jounal Guide To Management. Retrieved on 18th Aprill, 2014 from The Wall Street Journal: http://guides.wsj.com/management/developing-a-leadership-style/what-is-the-difference-between-management-and-leadership/
Leadership is the ability to influence employees to voluntarily pursue organizational goals. Leadership is vision, enthusiasm, love, trust, passion and consistency. Management is to pursue organizational goals efficiently and effectively by integrating the work of people through planning, organizing, leading, and controlling organizations resources. Leadership and management are not the same. They are not interchangeable. Leadership is coping with change and management is coping with complexity (Williams 444).
Pierce, Jon L. and John W. Newstrom (2011) 6th edition. Leaders and the Leadership Process.
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. p. 1-19. Retrieved from http://www.blackdiamond.dk/HDO/Organisation_Gary_Yukl_Leadership_in_Organizations.pdf
The phrase “leader” versus “manager.” is used to show and compere how Leading is related to managing, Bennis and Nanus (1985:21) help us understand the broader role of supervision in their discussion of management and leadership: “To be a manager is to bring about, to accomplish, to have charge of, responsibility for, to conduct. Leading, on the other hand, is influencing, guiding in direction, course, action, opinion.” They go on to say that managers are people who “do things right,” and leaders are people who “do the right things.” Managers are more efficiency driven and focus on mastering routine activities, while leaders are driven by vision and judgment. Managers tend to be bean counters, while leaders focus on achieving desired results.
McLean, J. (2005). Management and leadership: Dispelling the myths. British Journal of Administrative Management, 9(1), 16-17. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy2.apus.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=20&sid=5c780ccf-104d-49c6-9368-db4615f766bd%40sessionmgr113&hid=108
Northouse, P. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
Nahavandi, A. (2011). The Art And Science of Leadership (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
In today’s complex management environment, I believe that the mindset of a manger weigh the same as their views and attitude on the job. Certainly, Jonathan Gosling an established scholar and the director of the Centre for Leadership Studies at the University of Exeter provide an excellent view on the diverse talent requirements in effective management. The main issue identified by the author is the connection between leadership and management. Separation of management and leadership is impractical. However not all good leaders are good managers and vice versa. Gosling, and Mintzberg (2003), argues that management without leadership promotes uninspired behavior, which hinders business activities. On the other hand, leadership devoid of management results in disconnect of actions and ideas. I concur with the author’s argument on the relationship between management and leadership. I believe that good managers should be good leaders too. However, most organizations do not enjoy both the benefits of effective leadership and management. In particular, most organizations lack either of these ...
The method of leadership is almost as similar as management, and a leader can be a manager. “Both management and leadership are seen as positions of responsibility or accountability in an organization” (Edwards, Schedlitzki, Turnbull, & Gill, 2015). Leadership and management can relate and overlap within the roles and functions and are similar within one another in meaning. Together leadership and management direct the actions of a group or individually.
Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). Some people believe leadership and management are one in the same; however, this
Management and leadership are very important functions in getting a job done. In Peter Drucker`s statement “Management is doing things right and leadership is doing the right things”, doing things right means being able to perform well, whilst doing the right things is knowing what exactly what to do inorder to perform well. Management is associated with efficiency, and involves coordinating people's efforts and the allocation of resources to maximize productivity whilst leadership is to effectiveness, which involves directing and inspiring people to achieve set goals (Sterling, 2014). Leadership and management are different but are closely linked functions: each is complimentary to the other and is essential in ensuring change in achieving strategic goals and in boosting team performance (SmallBizConnect, 2012). In this paper, I will explain why knowing yourself and understanding others form the basis for efficient management and effective leadership, and how these concepts can be improved upon. In addition, I would explore how management and leadership complement each other in pragmatic leadership and the great debaters.
Leadership and management are two words that are commonly mistaken; the relation and the differences between them are often unclear. Leadership can be defined as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or a set of goals." Managers are there to plan, organize, lead and monitor employees' activities. Leaders also have to be able to guide an organization through change. As we will see later, vision is a crucial component in the success of this task.
Leadership and management are two fundamental concepts which are involved in the effective management of organizations. Leadership in my opinion is a complex concept, which includes association of human qualities and the result of their activities. To be a great leader means not only following own visions, but also work towards company’s goals.