Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although the Detroit rebellion in 1967 brought to light many adverse societal conditions facing African American families, I do not believe these acts qualified this rebellion as a social movement. According to Blau and Abramovitz (2014, pg. 200) a modern social movement includes not only collective action among individuals challenging prevailing social norms, but also the presence of formal organization, funding, access to the political process, a degree of longevity and resulting in ongoing long-lived tension . I would argue that the 1967 Detroit rebellion had some aspects of the above mentioned social movement definition, such as, a number of people responding collectively to challenge current negative norms towards African American families as well as great unresolved historical tension between the African American and White …show more content…
communities.
Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968, pg. 8) indicated that “Disorder did not erupt as a result of a single triggering incident. Instead, it was generated out of an increasingly disturbed social atmosphere…” However, with that being said, the 1967 rebellion was missing a few key factors to qualify it as a social movement, such as, formal organization, funding to support its efforts, political access, longevity and frankly there were no identified “asks” or stated outcomes in regards to this social uprising. It appears that an incident occurred and a social outcry of the mistreatment of African American individuals started because the community had finally had enough. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968, pg. 8) also found no evidence that the incidents were planned or directed by any organization, further confirming that this does not meet social movement
criteria. As far as the topic of continuing to provide free birth control as a public health policy, there are currently no social movements in process. However, that’s not to say that there has never been a social movement in regards to birth control. The original birth control social movement occurred from 1914-1945 as a means to provide contraception to women in a society who saw these methods as obscene. (Birth Control in the United States, 2017) Many efforts, pioneered by Margaret Sanger including, creating a newsletter discussing birth control, opening two birth control clinics (one of which was shut down immediately and cost her time in jail) and incorporating birth control into medical school curriculums occurred during this social movement. (Birth Control in the United States, 2017). This movement resulted in societal views of birth control shifting from obscene to regarding the option as a public health issue. As for the current day policy in question of free birth control, I believe that there isn’t a social movement as of yet due to the fact that individuals are still able to obtain birth control without cost. If policy changes that would affect access to birth control based on cost implications, then the start of a social movement may form, but because there is no immediate ramifications as of yet the social outcry, leading to collective action has not yet occurred. I believe social movements are a successful means to accomplishing social change in social policy, especially concerning low income individuals, because of the opportunity the social movement provides for those with less individual influence. Blau and Abramovitz (2014, pg. 221) discuss the class conflict within our society and state, “Social movements appear when subordinate groups decide that authorities have appropriated an unfair share of societal status, privilege, wealth or power.” I’m not alluding that social movements only work for those without privilege or status, but stating that social movements provide an avenue to express dissatisfaction and mistreatment of societal norms by those who would have not had the opportunity to do so otherwise. I do believe social movements take time, effort, sacrifice and longstanding commitment, but overall move the needle towards equality and truly impact societal changes for the better.
In this paper, I will be talking about the 1968 Riots and Gallaudet College during its weeklong take-over by the United States military. I will also briefly explain who Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was and why his death had impacted the Black community directly and how Gallaudet College was impacted as a result. I will be using several academic articles and journals written about this incident and use the Gallaudet Buff and Blue newsletters heavily for my main source as well as analytically.
Eric Arnesen’s book, Black Protest and the Great Migration: A Brief History with Documents, successfully portrays the struggles of early life for African Americans as well as why they migrated to the north in the years of World War I. During the first world war, the lives of as many as 500,000 African Americans changed dramatically as southern blacks migrated to the north. The migration escalated a shift in the population from extremely rural people to urban people in the years following the second world war. Those who lived in the south, particularly black southerners, had many reasons for why they wanted to move to the north. Due to the failure of Reconstruction, which was supposed to re-build the South after the Union victory and grant slaves
10). The large characteristics associated with a social movement distinguish the movement from a regional or local, short-term pressure group, campaign, or “protest act” (Stewart, Smith, & Denton 2012, p. 10). The Civil Rights Movement is easily distinguishable from a social collective, largely due to the immense geographical size and longevity of the movement. The Civil Rights Movement took place all across the American south and endured on for well over a decade starting in the mid 1950s and ending in the late 1960s. The movement, led by Martin Luther King Jr. grew steadily out of Montgomery, Alabama, taking over the Deep South, one city at a time with the aim of tackling a relentless history of oppression and segregation.
...War and the Civil Rights Movements in order to illustrate how the 1960s was a time of “tumult and change.” To Anderson, it is these events, which sparked the demand for recognition of social and economic fairness. He makes prominent the idea that the 1960s served as the origin of activism and the birth of the civil rights movement, forever changing ideals that embody America. The book overall is comprehensive and a definite attention grabber. It shows how the decade had the effect of drastically transforming life in America and challenging the unequal status quo that has characterized most of the nation's history. Despite the violence and conflict that was provoked by these changes, the activism and the liberation movements that took place have left a permanent imprint upon the country.
One of the first documented incidents of the sit-ins for the civil rights movement was on February 1, 1960 in Nashville, Tennessee. Four college African-Americans sat at a lunch counter and refused to leave. During this time, blacks were not allowed to sit at certain lunch counters that were reserved for white people. These black students sat at a white lunch counter and refused to leave. This sit-in was a direct challenge to southern tradition. Trained in non-violence, the students refused to fight back and later were arrested by Nashville police. The students were drawn to activist Jim Lossen and his workshops of non-violence. The non-violent workshops were training on how to practice non-violent protests. John Lewis, Angela Butler, and Diane Nash led students to the first lunch counter sit-in. Diane Nash said, "We were scared to death because we didn't know what was going to happen." For two weeks there were no incidences with violence. This all changed on February 27, 1960, when white people started to beat the students. Nashville police did nothing to protect the black students. The students remained true to their training in non-violence and refused to fight back. When the police vans arrived, more than eighty demonstrators were arrested and summarily charged for disorderly conduct. The demonstrators knew they would be arrested. So, they planned that as soon as the first wave of demonstrators was arrested, a second wave of demonstrators would take their place. If and when the second wave of demonstrators were arrested and removed, a third would take their place. The students planned for multiple waves of demonstrators.
During the late 1860s the Red River Settlement was rapidly changing and along with these changes came multiple causes and conflicts that would subsequently to a resistance called the Red River Rebellion. Many profound changes occurred in the Red River Settlement that had caused problems and hostility among the inhabitants to emerge such as:the arrival of Canadians to the settlement, the economic problems and the decline of the Hudson Bay Company. However, the Red River Rebellion was sparked by the Hudson Bay Company selling Rupert’s Land to the new Dominion of Canada without consulting with the inhabitants nor paying any regards to their interests.The colonists of the Red River Settlement, many of whom were Metis, feared for their culture and land rights under the dominion’s control. In order to ascertain that their rights would be protected, the Metis set up a provisional government under the leadership of Louis Riel to negotiate an agreement with the new Dominion of Canada that the Red River Settlement and the lands surrounding it, could enter Confederation as the province of Manitoba under their own terms.
under "force" the use of threat of violence by any party or institution to atta...
The Montgomery Bus Boycott can be viewed as a symbol of the Civil Rights Movement as a whole, as neither one’s success was due solely to the work of the political system; a transformation in the consciousness of America was the most impactful success of both. Passionate racism ran in the veins of 1950s America, primarily in the south, and no integration law would influence the widespread belief that African Americans were the same level of human as Caucasians. The abolition of racism as a political norm had to start with a unanimous belief among blacks that they had power as American citizens; once they believed that to be true, there was no limit to the successes they could see.
The Civil Rights Movement is usually seen as a social movement primarily throughout the Southern states during the 1950’s and throughout the 1960’s. However, the movement is taught by giving specific points, events, places, and people. The Civil Rights Movement in some regions such as the Mississippi Delta is not credited enough in history. The movement found crucial support inside of the Mississippi Delta due to its population being predominately African American. The Mississippi Delta played a key role not only in the movement, but in its development from encompassing Civil Rights activist, movements, tragic events, and more.
Lawson, Steven F., and Charles M. Payne. Debating the Civil Rights Movement, 1945-1968. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006. 140. Print.
Growing up in the post-Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, most US citizens have a broad and unspecific knowledge of this movement and its effects. Even fewer citizens know the causes and the driving factors of the movement. The Dredd Scott Decision, and Plessy v. Ferguson were two of the driving forces behind social change in the 1960s. There is a simple progression of American civil laws and the precedence they carry; likewise, the change in the American ideas of equality, and the interpretation of the 13th-15th amendments forged the way for these court cases to hold credence.
Shaskolsky, Leon. “The Negro Protest Movement- Revolt or Reform?.” Phylon 29 (1963): 156-166. JSTOR. U of Illinois Lib., Urbana. 11 Apr. 2004 .
In New York during the 1940’s a non-violent act of civil disobedience occurred among blacks to protest segregation laws. Blacks were not allowed to live in white neighborhoods, had to ride in the back of buses, lived in poverty with poor schools, and were frequently beaten by police.
The Web. The Web. 5 Nov. 2011. http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Economy/occupy-wall-street-protests- spread-nationwide/story?id=14681988#.TrmQeHIeqdg>. Haines, Herbert H.. "Black Radicalization and the Funding of the Civil Rights: 1957-1970.
American Civil Rights Movement By Eric Eckhart The American Civil Rights movement was a movement in which African Americans were once slaves and over many generations fought in nonviolent means such as protests, sit-ins, boycotts, and many other forms of civil disobedience in order to receive equal rights as whites in society. The American civil rights movement never really had either a starting or a stopping date in history. However, these African American citizens had remarkable courage to never stop, until these un-just laws were changed and they received what they had been fighting for all along, their inalienable rights as human beings and to be equal to all other human beings. Up until this very day there are still racial issues where some people feel supreme over other people due to race.