Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Questions on the paris peace conference
Strengths and weaknesses of the treaty of versailles essays
Strengths and weaknesses of the treaty of versailles essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Questions on the paris peace conference
Today, historians believe that, “the Treaty was the best that could be hoped for in the circumstances”. How far do you agree with the statement? Justify your response. The treaty of Versailles was the first treaty after world war one that dealt with Germany. The treaty was first discussed by the allied powers of France, England and USA as well as Japan and Italy. Germany was not invited to discuss the terms of the treaty and the terms, once decided, were to be signed by Germany. Certain terms, while beneficial to the allied powers, dangerous and provoking towards Germany while other terms were consider not harsh enough by some nations. It was difficult to come up with a treaty that both dealt with Germany (hereby making the people happy) but at the same time wasn't too harsh (to stop from provoking of a relapse of world war 1). I feel the treaty was too harsh and the points below help establish why. The circumstances were such that the allied powers had to keep the community happy and punish Germany while at the same time they had to make sure Germany wouldn't retaliate. Harold Nicholson feared the worst and stated "The historian, with every justification, will come to the conclusion that we were very stupid men... We arrived determined that a Peace of justice and wisdom should be negotiated; we left the conference conscious that the treaties imposed upon our enemies were neither just nor wise." Other criticism includes "The Peace of Versailles was an unsatisfactory compromise with little chance of ensuring an enduring peace. Each of the 'Big Three' had different aims which had to be modified in order to reach an overall agreement and the Germans were not even allowed to take part in the negotiations. Germany was humiliat... ... middle of paper ... ...like they were cheated by Britain and USA. There were also mixed reactions in France as some were satisfied but nobody felt the treaty was too harsh. 3. USA: They felt like the treaty was not completely fair and in some sort of way just wanted to spread democracy and make sure there was no such war in the future. Though they initiated the League of Nations they didn't take part in it. 4. Germany : The reactions of Germans in general was 'pain and anger'. They felt it was unfair. It was a forced resolution. They had not been permitted to take part in the meeting – they had just been told to sign. Many German politicians criticized the treaty and offered counter proposals and they were not considered. This is when Lloyd George felt they should rethink the treaty. Many Germans sought to decline the treaty; a few even recommended that they initiate the war again.
Many delegates were opposed to this, however it happened anyway. The harsh conditions led to WWII, the very thing the treaty was supposed to prevent. As the world engaged in war, its economy plummeted and faced both short and long-term effects.
The Allies held a gun to Germany's head, with their trigger finger tense. Each article of the Versailles Treaty only made Germany more restless, until 1933 when Hitler produced his own gun and pointed it at the Allies. The Treaty had a series of unproportional effects upon Germany and its people. It caused a rift between the two sides because of the alliances that it formed, brewing tension. The punishments enforced upon Germany were unrealistically huge and it increased the wish among the Germans for the nullification of the Treaty.
It is important to have some information about the organization that the strategic planning will cover. This section of the strategic plan gives a rapid review of the organization in order to understand the circumstances that the organization is performing in.
The harshness of the Treaty and the way in which it blamed Germany for World War I crippled Germany. Much of its territory was taken away from it, including West Prussia that went to form a new Polish Corridor to the sea. Plus the Treaty forced Germany to reduce its army, demilitarise the Rhineland and get rid of its navy. The Treaty also forced harsh reparations for the War resulting in a great deal of the German people resenting the Allies. And it was later that Hitler used the bitter memories of Versailles to gain public support for his actions.
The Treaty of Versailles is a cause of World War II because of the restrictions it placed on Germany as the alleged sole aggressor of the war. The war reparation totaled $98 billion, and under Clause 231 Germany was forced to take the entire load onto her ruined economy and attempt to repay the debt starting with an initial $5 billion payment. In terms of military, Germany was limited to a 100,000 man army, with her navy stripped to the level of a coast guard, she was allowed no heavy artillery, no weapons of mass destruction and the border with France became a demilitarized zone for 15 years following the signing of the treaty on June 28 1919. Germany also lost all her territories in Africa and became a mandate of the Allied Forces, those living in mandated zones could participate in “self-determination” after the Allies taught them how to be a democracy (...
middle of paper ... ... The Treaty of Versailles, initially created to keep peace in Europe and ensure that another war like World War I wouldn’t happen again, had in fact, backfired and spiraled the world down into a deeper, bloodier battle. The treaty discriminated strongly against Germany, with the loss of territories, military restrictions, economic reparations, and the War Guilt Clause. It caused humiliation and anger within Germany, and led to Hitler and the Nazi Party coming to power.
Even before the eve of the Revolution, the colonists constantly had the image of independence lingering in the back of their heads. The colonists felt that they were first on a loose leash, and as that leash tightened over the years, the colonists began to understand their true culture and identity. As time passed, the colonists developed a greater sense of their identity and unity as Americans and by the eve of the Revolution, even though at first the colonists were unorganized and had problems with being united, they remained determined to gain their identity and unity as Americans.
The French; for example, was one who thought this treaty was too moderate and was highly disappointed by it (“D.1. The Treaty of Versailles”). They wanted to get rid of Germany all together, but on the other hand, the British and Americans wanted to avoid forming pretext for a new war (History.com Staff). Allied countries thought that the treaty was a just punishment to Germany, but in the United States it was received with mixed feelings and reviews (Adams). All responsibility for World War I was given to Germany, and they were ordered to pay reparations (Benson). Germany had been anything except pleased about this, and not to mention they felt utterly embarrassed about the situation (Benson). They also felt completely betrayed by Wilson and the United States (“D.1. The Treaty of Versailles”). Under protest and the threat of an invasion, they signed this document (Benson).
When the details of the treaty were published in June 1919 most Germans were horrified. Germany had not been allowed to the Peace Conference and was told to accept the terms or else. Most Germans however, had believed that the Treaty would be lenient because of Wilson's Fourteen Points.
The first step in identifying whether or not the peace settlement after World War I (WWI), would be the effectiveness of communication to the Germans. In order to properly communicate, one must simply tell the people involved what the conditions are and the consequences for not following them. In addition, the demands must be moderate and the opponent needs to be made clear that it will not favor them in the long run if they do not comply to the terms. While Germany was effectively given the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, one could argue that it was done in an unfair manner. Germany was not even present at the negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles and the Germans expected something along the lines of Wilson’s 14 point plan. At the end of the discussions,
...the provisions weren?t harsh enough.? Yet some might argue that, ? ..severe as the treaty seemed to be it should be remembered that Germany might easily have forced much more worse, if Clemenceau?s had his way.? However through all the excessive damaged Germans have caused throughout the WWI, to treaty is justifiable.
The Treaty of Versailles was one of the factors that led to the inevitability of World War Two. The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty that occurred as a result of the Paris Peace Conference that was held after Germany was defeated in World War One. The Treaty was put into action and required that Germany should accept responsibility for the war; of course Germany was humiliated by this. They were required to pay colossal war reparation payments. This was one of the main reasons the treaty had a severe impact on Germany; it crippled the German economy and critically reduced the living standards of the people. This made it virtually impossible for the German economy to function productively. The effects that the treaty had on Germany directly led to the rise of Hitler who he capitalised on German resentment at their treatment. He provided a focus for the German people and their desire to take back what they once had, and to restore their pride once again becoming a glorious nation.
Treaty of Versailles was a treaty between the Allies and Germany. Allied leaders considered it the most important of the five agreements. While the Allies believed it was the most important the Germans thought I was unfair. The treaty forced Germany to pay money to the winners and to give up land and weapons. Many treaties were made. Although they tried to make treaties, it still didn't help later
It has been almost a century since the first Paris Peace Conference was hold, but even until now, it is a popular yet also controversial event in the history of the world. The Paris Peace Conference took place in 1919 involving more than 1,000 representatives from over 30 nations. The results of the Conference are five treaties regarding terms that, according to the Conference, shall prevent any upcoming conflicts among nations. Although World War II started only after 15 years, nonetheless, the treaties did function as a buffer between countries. Although many resolutions were discussed, the negotiation of the Conference revolves around four main topics, reparation from the previous war losses or limitations on the main Central Power, Germany, self-recognition, President Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points, and the annexation of land.
As World War I ended, with great power and craftsmanship The Treaty Of Versailles was created. But, was all of it's content fair or well rounded for the situation at hand? To counter my points, the composers of the treaty as well as those opposed to Germany and their ways. They want to make Germany pay for what they caused, and this is how they believe it to be fair, even though that shall be debated. This peace treaty was made to put a close to the war between The Allies and Germany. The treaty put all the blame of the war on Germany, as well as imposed new rules affected Germany’s money income, land, and citizens. It has sent Germany into a rough time economically, and eventually the whole country was bombarded by the Nazis and Hitler. Now, that it was the German’s fault to this war. I believe that some of the regards put on them should have been lightened.