Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Victor Frankenstein's obsession with natural science
Frankenstein critical essay family
Frankenstein critical essay family
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Victor Frankenstein's obsession with natural science
It is good to be determined and passionate about the things that you are learning and doing, but it is not good to become obsessive about anything. In most cases obsession tends to lead people down the wrong path or cause them to make the wrong decisions in their life. One of the things that people used to be obsessed with was knowledge. This is because people knew so little about the world and about themselves. People were very curious about certain things and some decided to accidentally try things out which led to discoveries. But others decided to become obsessed about the subject that they were studying and destroy their lives in the process. One example is Frankenstein. He was a giant dumb smart person that was also obsessive about science …show more content…
Why did he not listen to the warnings that people was giving him? Well people were warning Frankenstein not study alchemy and the books that he was studying was trash. So why did he not listen? Well his excuse for not listening to his father was “my father was not scientific, and I was left to struggle with a child’s blindness, added to a student’s thirst for knowledge” (Shelley 21). He basically said that his father did not know anything about science and he did not listen to him because of it. This is how he judge people when it comes to knowledge. When a person says something that he doesn’t agree with or don’t want to hear he finds a reason not to listen to them. Like with M. Krempe, Frankenstein’s entire reason for not listening to him is because of his looks. Krempe is not beautiful enough to give him advice. Not only that but Frankenstein dislikes how they tell him. They can appear somewhat mean when they tell him that alchemy is no longer practiced. Frankenstein wants to learn to create life and wants to basically be god. He wants to know about alchemy and whether or not it can be done. But “this view of knowledge suggests a one-way relationship between learner and knowledge. The role of the learner is to obtain the knowledge or make the discovery, and then pass it on to others. It is not to engage or reflect critically in any way” (Gómez 364). Of course Frankenstein is curious but he doesn’t want to learn so …show more content…
Well, Monster started to teach himself and at the same time stalk Frankenstein. But why stalk the man that left you behind. Well it seemed like Monster was abandoned and attacked so much to the point that he couldn’t help but feel insecure about himself. He started to question his reason for being created. Maybe that is why monster started to stalk Frankenstein because Frankenstein created him. Monster had no reason for being so he made his reason for being his creator. Monster wanted his creator to feel what he felt for that two years and understand what it felt like to be alone. This all goes back to Frankenstein being a parent. This also shows what happened when “he violates a primal contract, the universal contract between creator and created, which specifies that the father owes his children the means to live, that creation mandates nurture. Frankenstein can create but he cannot nourish” (Vargish 329). It points to that because the monster could have been able to get pass that if he had that one person to be there every step of the way. If Frankenstein was to nourish him mentally the monster probably wouldn’t have killed so many people. Look at the end when Frankenstein dies, Monster is pretty heartbroken about it. He has lost his reason for being. He has no idea what to do with his life without his father. So maybe the reason Monster chose to use violence was because that was all he experienced and all he basically
In the world today there is a drive to evolve and improve life through science and its findings. When looking at the good of a society, the people have to decide when the line between right and wrong is drawn. In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, she proves that the possession of knowledge can lead to destructive forces through Victor Frankenstein’s monster’s journey. The events that lead to Victor’s monster’s destructive path is when he comes into contact with the cottagers, he murders Victor’s brother, and runs away after destroying Victor’s life.
abandoned; this made him feel as if he was the only person with out no
The creation’s actions are influenced by his desire to make an impact upon Frankenstein. His decision to move to Geneva, his continuous contact with the human population when he could just as easily go off and live in nature, and the way he lives his life with killing and tormenting, all in hopes of having an influence upon Frankenstein. For example, at the end of the book, a large portion of the creation’s life motivation is to lead Frankenstein across the world, having him endure perpetual torment. The creation says, “I have devoted my creator, the select specimen of all that is worthy of love and admiration among men, to misery; I have pursued him even to that irremediable ruin” (185, Shelly). The creation turns this into sort of a game, every time Frankenstein is close to quitting the monster provides him with a clue or resources. In a type of sadistic way, the creation coerced Frankenstein into finally spending some father son time. This lack of attention provided by Frankenstein causes the monster to act out. This is mirrored by God’s negligence of Adam in the book of Genesis. The desire for a father’s attention is directly mirrored by Frankenstein and it seems as though Mary Shelley was commentating on the importance of a father’s presence in the life of their children. The novel Frankenstein implies that the concern and attention of one’s parental
As Frankenstein is enroute to his pursuit of gaining more knowledge, he states, “I wished, as it were, to procrastinate all that related to my feelings of affection until the great object, which swallowed up every habit of my nature, should be completed” (Shelley 41). Frankenstein’s decision in allowing his intellectual ambitions to overpower everything else in his life leads him to be blinded to the dangers of creating life. He isolates himself from his society when creating the monster, letting himself be immersed in his creation while being driven by his passions, allowing nobody to be near him. The fact that he allows this creation of a monster to consume his total being reveals how blinded he is to the immorality of stepping outside the boundaries of science and defying nature. His goal in striving to achieve what wants to in placing man over nature makes him lose his sense of self as all he is focused on is the final product of his creation. He starts to realize his own faults as after he has created the monster, he becomes very ill and states, “The form of the monster on whom I had bestowed existence was forever before my eyes, and I raved incessantly concerning him” (48). His impulsive decision to make the monster leads him to abhorring it as it does not turn out to be what he has expected. Because he chooses to isolate himself in creating the
In "Frankenstein" by Mary Shelley, Victor Frankenstein creates a monster that brings chaos and deaths to Victor Frankenstein's family and friends for revenge. This is one example of how too much knowledge can be dangerous. In addition to Frankenstein, the classical novel, "The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Hyde." exemplifies why too much knowledge can cause chaos. In the novel, Dr. Jekyll creates salt in his laboratory that changes his physical appearance. Thus makes an alter ego named Hyde who murders citizens of England for pleasure. This changes Dr. Jekyll since he keeps switching appearances until one day, he changes to Hyde permanently. These examples show that the misuse of knowledge is dangerous. From bringing misery to Frankenstein to changing into a murderous alter ego, humans cannot handle too much
As of this writing, I have decided to regard the local TV channel's "The more you know..." commercials as being evil. I do not understand how anyone could regard "knowledge" as anything but evil. "The more you know..." the more your mind feels the need to explorer for more knowledge and the more evil it will encounter. The more you search, the more ignorant you realize you are and the more open to pain you become. Who needs to have the knowledge possessed by God or the knowledge of creation from nothing? Frankenstein "...ardently desired the acquisition of knowledge" and later came to realize "...how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge."
...ich may be described as a desperate addiction to discovery is a fine concept but a dangerous practice. Man's natural flaws debase any professed altruistic goal; all attempts at discovery are ultimately revealed to be corrupt, selfish, and misbegotten.
Mary Shelley's Attitude to Knowledge in Frankenstein Mary Shelley is a gothic writer, who (through this novel 'Frankenstein') has been able to create a hybrid form of gothic literature, a gothic/horror genre which allows Shelley to convey a more realistic terror, one that resides within the psyche instead of a form outside , an example would be Ghosts. Her knowledge on different subjects allows her to create a realistic world in the novel, possibly even criticising her own husband Percy Shelley, who searched for knowledge and in doing so became egotistical and self obsessed like a true romantic just like Frankenstein and other romantic characters like him. Shelley was always surrounded by intelligent people, which were mainly her father and his inner circle that also included her husband. These people encouraged Shelley to educate herself and develop her own opinions. Shelley found the gothic genre a perfect place in which she could air her thoughts, such as a critical view of certain powers in her society and imply things about the industrial revolution through subtle remarks in the novel.
At the beginning of life, humans are exposed to the outside world with an open and blank mind. A newborn has no knowledge, no concerns or worries and it only seeks to fulfill its main necessities. Surrounded by the outside world one lives through many experiences where knowledge is accepted. Encountering other human beings reflects upon one's perception and brings about ones self decisions. Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, written in 1816, demonstrates through characters that an obsessive desire for more knowledge may ruin ones life.
Frankenstein is a book written by Mary Shelley in 1818, that is revolved around a under privileged scientist named Victor Frankenstein who manages to create a unnatural human-like being. The story was written when Shelley was in her late teen age years, and was published when she was just twenty years old. Frankenstein is filled with several different elements of the Gothic and Romantic Movement of British literature, and is considered to be one of the earliest forms of science fiction. Frankenstein is a very complicated and complex story that challenges different ethics and morals on the apparent theme of dangerous knowledge. With the mysterious experiment that Dr. Victor Frankenstein conducted, Shelly causes her reader to ultimately ask themselves what price is too high to pay to gain knowledge. It is evident that Shelly allows the reader to sort of “wonder” about the reaction they would take when dealing with a situation such as the one implemented throughout the book.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Shelley shows that the acquisition of knowledge can be dangerous through the characters of Victor Frankenstein, the Monster, and Robert Walton. Knowledge is a good thing to a certain extent but it can consume a person’s life and have negative affects. The unlimited quest for knowledge is a negative flaw in some humans.
By definition, knowledge is the fact or condition of knowing something with familiarity gained through experience or association (Merriam-Webster.com). In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley considers knowledge as a “dangerous” factor. The danger of it is proved throughout the actions of the characters Robert Walton, Victor Frankenstein, and the creature. The characters all embody the theme of knowledge in different ways. Shelley supports her opinion about knowledge by using references from the Bible and Paradise Lost. She uses these references to show the relationship between God’s Adam and Frankenstein’s creature, and how nothing turns out as great as God’s creation. Mary Shelley’s goal is to teach a lesson on how destructive the desire for knowledge really is.
Knowledge can be a good thing if we use it wisely and properly, but if you don’t use it wisely it may bring a harmless rumor or cause an awful consequence. In Frankenstein’s case knowledge was not a good thing. The novel, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, was an intriguing story with many comparisons of the great powers in life. It contains many themes of our society today. It contrasts science and literary, technology and human, life and death, but mainly it consisted of knowledge and ignorance. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley makes the theme evident with knowledge in the characters development.
Affective science is the study of emotion and how it inadvertently affects every decision a person makes. While the study of something that cannot be seen even on a cellular level is often controversial, individuals experience the direct correlation emotions have on decisions every day. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the emotion of misery progresses throughout the novel until it is all that remains. It is through this progression that the readers see that the factors that contribute most to misery are: living without a being that provides support and living without the acceptance of others.
He was not willing to take responsibility for the monster he created. The monster was his responsibilities, his belongings, but Frankenstein didn’t accept the monster, “I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room, and continued a long time traversing my bedchamber…” (35). the moment his creation comes to life, Frankenstein abandons it and letting it free into the world. Frankenstein did not know what the monster is even capable of, leaves it unattended. In the article, “The Age of Biological Control”, A.T. Nuyen discusses bioethics as well as Confucianism, which is the religion of ethical, political, and social teachings. The article also goes over Francis Fukuyama’s concepts which examine the transformation human beings will go through. Moral principles don’t seem to matter because scientists are willing to do just about anything to reach their scientific goal, no matter the responsibilities that follow. Shelley reveals how ignoring one’s responsibility will catch up to them and cause havoc on their life. Frankenstein avoided his responsibility of the monster and in return, the monster began killing his loved ones and getting revenge on his creator for abandoning