Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disaster and preparedness quizlet
Disaster and preparedness quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disaster and preparedness quizlet
Every minute, two people die from accidental drowning according to the “International Life Saving Federation”. That’s almost 1.2 million people a year. The difference between surviving and perishing can happen that often. In life or death situations, people should be held accountable for their actions because of the the time it takes to rescue people, the cost of the rescue, and how ultimately, survival is their own responsibility. To begin with, people should be accountable for their actions because of the time it takes for rescue teams to safely get the victim out of the dangerous situation. For instance, in “The Cost of Survival”, a man in Germany was exploring caves when he fell “...nearly 4,000 feet underground when he was hit by a …show more content…
In “The Cost of Survival”, the author describes a news story in 2014 when a family of four’s child got sick while they were on a boat about 900 miles from the shore of Mexico. The author also said, “Their rescue involved the US Navy, the Coast Guard, and the California Air National Guard.” For the family to be found and the child to be rescued cost $663,000 not even including pay for the rescue workers. That’s a lot of money for just one family to be rescued when only one child needed help. Others might say that nobody knows when they are going to get sick and often the timing is just unlucky. Parents especially will do anything in their power to make sure their child is healthy and safe regardless of the cost, time, or resources needed to ensure this. My position is stronger however because if everyone were to get worried about their child being sick, whole countries would go bankrupt if the cost of rescuing that family of four is representative of every rescue. Yes, everyone may worry from time to time about sickness but they could prevent the sickness from even coming on. People can take precautions, especially out on the water, like making sure there is enough fresh water on board, making sure a first aid kit is handy and other preventative measures such as hand sanitizer or tissues. That family should be held accountable for their actions because of …show more content…
In the story, “To Build A Fire,” by Jack London, a man goes hiking on the Yukon trail in Alaska and a series of events sends him spiraling down on a path towards death. He was walking alongside some springs when he broke through the ice and into the water. More specifically, “...he wetted himself halfway to the knees.” He tried to make a fire but the snow ended up blowing the fire out and he tried to make the fire again in a different spot but his hands were too numb to get it started.. Eventually, he decided to try to make a run for it back to camp so his friends could help him but but he didn’t make it. There were many actions he could have taken to prevent the situation such as watching where he was going, or watching where he built the fire. If he had just done those things, he wouldn’t have died. The ordeal was solely his fault when he died because surviving was his own responsibility and his actions affected his survival. He was in charge of himself. People who disagree may say that outside factors such as nature or things that can’t be controlled may play a part in their survival so it wouldn’t completely be their responsibility. In “To Build A Fire”, the man didn’t know the snow was going to come tumbling down and crush his fire so nature played a part in his demise. They might also say that they wouldn’t be able to predict how nature is going to play out, especially
He ventures into merciless terrain of Alaska and unfortunately, as he was not adequately prepared for the life in
The attribute of independence in these people helped in their survival because if they would have stayed and waited to be rescued they would have never survived. Independence can allow someone to think what is best for themselves, because no one knows when something could go differently than expected in a time of
In the article it talks about how it was a extremely ordinary day for the main character and he had no indications that today would be his last day on earth. With that in mind, this man chose to be courageous not knowing the consequences of his actions. "Every time they lowered a lifeline and flotation ring to him, he passed it on to another of the passengers". When the water was to take this mans life, it was unbeknownst to him, but he still had the courage to pass the rope to save another. Courage is not a attitude that one might claim in just a day. It is a characteristic that is made, created, and molded as you use it. With unfathomable courage, this heroic man passed the rope one last time, knowing he would never lay a hand on it again. Imagine the character he would have had to possess in order to utilize his agency, without hesitation, by passing on his chance of life to someone he didn't even
According to Hunter Thompson, “Luck is a very thin wire between survival and disaster, and not many people can keep their balance on it.” In “To Build a Fire,” by Jack London, the man was clumsy and fell to the side of disaster. According to the tips in “Deep Survival,” by Laurence Gonzales, there are many steps the man could have taken that would have given him a better shot at surviving. For example, the man may have survived if he would have taken correct, decisive action, if he would have stayed calm, and if he would have surrendered. Each time that he failed to complete these actions, it was like the wind blew and pushed him closer to his final disaster.
We hit a down hill point so we grabbed drift wood. It would save man power and be faster to sled down. The rest helped Landon out the most because he was the smallest so he didn 't have energy left to use. But this refreshed him so we could keep going. Time was not on are side. The only thing keeping us alive was the fact that if we got out we would be the first ones ever to make it out not dead. It was about the hottest point in the day now and we had to find shade or we would get to dehydrated and die. We drank all the water we had just to fine out that we had a under ground stream below
This topic is relevant to today’s society because it is important to save lives, and doing the opposite would just be inhumane. For example, there’s a single mom on a little adventure on Everest, alone, and she fell. Should rescue services help her to reunite with her little kids? Or should they “accidentally” put the poor kids in an orphanage? With the example given above, it is crystal clear that the option to save the mom is the best choice. And that’s why people do have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at risk. There are a lot of mountain climbing accidents happening every day, think about it, imagine how grieving life would be for the unfortunate climbers’ families if rescue services can’t help
Some people think that individuals should get rescued even thought they put themselves at risk. They say that rescuers signed up for that job, knowing they’ll put their life on the line. However, people shouldn’t die trying to save someone who purposely risk their life. After all, it is the climber’s fault, so their rescuer should have to die because of their faults.
As the plot unfolds, I feel the story's protagonist falls victim to several factors brought into play at once: his inexperience with the severity of the Klondike winters, his inability to envision the possible consequences of his decision to travel alone in such weather, a series of unfortunate events during his trip, and the misjudgment exercised in his attempts to survive those incidents. Though quick and alert, the man's lack of imagination renders him unable to visualize what might happen to a man traveling without a companion should adverse circumstances arise in such severe weather in an uninhabited landscape. When he indeed finds himself in dire straits as a result of getting wet in the brutal freezing weather, he once again fails to imagine how quickly the cold will threaten his life and consequently misjudges the severity of his situation. His poor judgment causes him to make one mistake after another until he finds himself incapable of extricating himself from his situation. It seems obvious that had he made himself more familiar with the culture of the land and paid attention to the warnings of the old-timer on Sulpher Creek, he might have chosen to delay his trip and live to travel another day.
That minor detail of the critical placement of the fire ultimately cost the man his life. The third...
...e of them fell through and got wet. Since both of these situations had consequences, the reader can foreshadow that this expedition is not going to end well for the man. The man not being on the dog’s side and listening to it got him in the last situation. He built his last fire underneath a tree and the snow melted and fell onto the fire and put it out. His ignorance and overconfidence in his survival skills and not trusting the instincts of the dog eventually led him to his death.
Obviously that was not the situation which was meant to occur. The cold served as a lesson to be taught to all explorers who would set foot into the never-ending winter from that day on. The continuous efforts that the man made to start a fire symbolize his will to survive. No will however is match for mother nature. The suffering man took on the role as a great teacher and hopefully preserver of life for generations to come.
Humans are programmed as children to follow the leader, to wait for instructions and to stay in line. This teaching is wonderful for normal, everyday life but deadly when used in disaster situations where time is the enemy. Many people die in disasters simply because they were waiting to be rescued. There is also the false assumption that during evacuations people will move like water. Unfortunately, as Ripley puts it, “The problem with treating people like water is that water molecules do not experience pain or fear” (Ripley, 121).
The man must hike across this area for approximately thirty-six miles before he reaches the camp at which he is expected to be. The constantly dropping temperature further complicates the hike. When he begins his journey at nine o'clock in the morning, it is at the day's high of fifty degrees, below. At the man's time of death, the temperature had made a sharp drop to seventy-five below. This setting brings a sense of harsh reality and an idea of how fragile the human body is to the piece.
He arrived at his first destination after about an hour of hiking. After a short while he figured he had looked over his new found haven enough, he was ready. He started down the grade with a small arsenal, consisting of a shovel, about ten granola bars, two bottles of power-ade, his snowshoes, and what was left in his hydration bladder in his pack. After descending about two hundred feet he came into the clearing he was hoping to find, it was as smooth as silk, twenty inches of fresh powder under his board. Up ahead he say a small but formidable drop off on the mountain, he knew if he was going to escape this with his dignity he was going to have to work some magic, to his success. The drop was approximately eighteen feet, but he was ready for it, he landed perfectly, it was like a dream the poof of snow exploding out from his impact, and the gentle flakes hitting his face. As he continued down the slope he did not realize that his gentle landing had severely weakened the physical structure of the mountain’s blanket, and that any moment he could bring the mass down upon himself at impossible speeds.
Natural disasters are natural events that cause damage or loss of life. These events effect millions of people all around the world each year. The effects that these disasters have on children can be very serious, but often vary based on the severity of the disaster. There are no ways to control these events, making them hard to predict and prepare for. In 1999, there were nearly seventy million children that were impacted by natural disasters, and with climate change continually worsening, this number is likely to triple by the year 2020 (Penrose and Takaki, 2006). When it comes to looking at the impacts of these disasters, children and their personal well beings are rarely the focus because there is a misconception that children aren't effected