The Collective Farms of Eastern Europe

2376 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Communism in Eastern Europe after WW2

The Collective Farms of Eastern Europe

The ideology of collectivisation 1st became a viable policy in

Stalinist Russia. The primary thinking behind this revolutionary

initiative was to improve agricultural production to a level that

could sustain the ever-increasing urban masses. Furthermore the

decision makers in Eastern Europe wished to ensure an abundant supply

of cheap food was available so that they could control, and keep real

wage rates at a manageable level. The collectivisation of agriculture

was envisaged by the socialist regimes as the “Ideal vehicle to

achieve this objective.” (1) The large-scale cultivation necessitated

by collectivisation was seen by the socialist regime as a fundament

strategy to improve the total productivity of the agricultural sector.

Within a short space of time its origins and principles had began to

spread rapidly throughout the Eastern European states, until the

widespread adoption of the policy became an essential tool for the

majority of socialist regimes.

As one looks at collectivisation throughout Eastern Europe, it becomes

apparent early on that no 2 nation states had identical results from

the adoption of this policy. Each State has to be judged on its own

merits and individual socio-economic results.

Hungary, Poland and Czechoslovakia were 3 infant states that had

collectivisation enforced upon them by the expansionist German regime.

In the immediate aftermath of the war they simultaneously decided that

they would progress with the ‘cooperative farm’ ethos that the Nazi

government had installed in their societies. It had shown a level of

effectiveness and efficiency that when ma...

... middle of paper ...

...on,

1994).

2. G. And N. Swain, Eastern Europe since 1945 (Basingstoke, 1998).

3. D. H. Aldroft and S. Morewood, Economic change in Eastern Europe

since 1918 (Aldershot, 1995).

4. M. Kaser and E.A. Radice, (eds.) The Economic History of Eastern

Europe 1919-1975, Volume II: Interwar Policy, the War and

Reconstruction (Oxford, 1985).

5. J. Lovenduski and J. Woodall, Politics and Society in Eastern

Europe (London, 1987).

6. G. Kolankiewicz and Paul G. Lewis, Poland: Politics, Economics and

Society (London, 1988).

7. M. Shafir, Romania: Politics, Economics and Society (London, 1985).

8. L. P. Morris, Eastern Europe since 1945.

9. A. L. Cartwright, The Return of the Peasant.

10. I. T. Berend, Central and Eastern Europe, 1944-1993: Detour from

the Periphery to the Periphery (Cambridge, 1996).

Show More
Related

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    Engel, B., 1997. Not by Bread Alone: Subsistence Riots in Russia during World War I*. The Journal of Modern History, 69(4), pp.696--721.

    Read More

  • Movements Throughout History Led by Farmers and the Economy

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    The populist movement occurred in the late 19th century, formed from the Grangers movement where its goal was ta movement for people, to change the economic system where it would benefit farmers. The grange movement rapidly declined in the 1870s and was replaced by the farmer alliances. The farmer alliances were more political rather then social. The farmer’s alliance later formed the populist. The populist movement is considered to be an agrarian revolt by farmers and those concerned with agriculture, because in the gilded age many people were moving to rural areas where banks and industrial systems were superior over agriculture. The high tariffs, decentralization of currency, and decreasing crop prices were hurting the farmers. Founded by James B Weaver and Tom Watson, they wanted the government to have a stronger control over banking and industries. Populism pursued limited coinage of silver and adjusted income tax so the wealthy would be paying more than the poor. They wanted free coinage of silver because this would eventually help the farmers pay off their debts. Parallel, they wanted the government to have control over railroads, telephone and telegraph systems. They wanted to government to be more in control and involved in the economy and most of all, wanted to stop laissez faire. They aimed for a secret ballot and direct election where the president would only hold office for 1 term. Although they won several seats in congress, the Populist Party never won any presidential elections. The Democrats supported much of the Populists goals. Nevertheless, they voted Democrat William Jennings Bryan for the presidency. His goal of unlimited coinage of silver gained the support of the Populist Party uncovered injustice...

    Read More

  • The Farmer's Movement of the Late 19th Century

    885 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the late nineteenth century, the agrarian movement evolved into a political force that energized American farmers to voice their political and economic grievances like never before. Although the movement essentially died after William Jennings Bryan's loss of the 1896 Presidential election, many of the reforms they fought for were eventually passed into law.

    Read More

  • The Success Of The FRG

    1542 Words  | 4 Pages

    The economic miracle was the high economic growth experienced by the FRG as a result of the Marshall plan and the financial reforms introduced by the finance minister, Ludwig Erhard. The financial reforms included implementing the currency reform in the Western Zones, lifting most restrictions on control prices in the market and reducing taxation. In the agriculture sector, although farmers continued to receive heavy subsidies, the structure of the economy was changed and as a consequence the proportion of the workforce employed in farming was nearly halved. This meant the economic miracle of the FRG wasn’t a total success because many people who previously had a job in the agricultural sector may find it harder to get a job elsewhere because they may have found it hard to transfer the necessary skills. However, it could still be argued that the agricultural sector was a success because although unemployment in the sector increased, the rationalisation by more mechanisation still brought about a substantial increase in production-nearly 25 per cent in the 10 years of the 1950s. Nevertheless, the agricultural sector wasn’t a total success because of the increase in unemployment in the sector. Another reason why the economic miracle wasn’t a total success was because Erhard’s implementation of the social market economy in 1948-9 did not immediately cause economic take off. The steep rise of prices which occurred was not matched by the rate of wage increases. This meant that the economic miracle wasn’t a total success because there was hardship for the poorer people in society as a result of prices rising at a faster rate than wages. Furthermore, the shortages of many resources, especially coal, led to a sharp increase in imports and a serious balance of payments deficit. This meant that the economic miracle wasn’t a total success because the German economy faced recession in 1949-50 because there was

    Read More

  • Theme Of Socialism In The Jungle By Upton Sinclair

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mau, Vladimir. " The road to 'perestrokia': economics in the USSR and the problem of

    Read More

  • The Role of Peasant Women in Soviet Society

    1082 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the October Revolution of 1917, Soviet Society was dramatically changed in the countryside. Prior to the revolution the countryside consisted of family plots that allowed them sustain themselves. On these family farms women from a young age worked alongside men. The self-sustaining family plot was one in which every member of the family had their share of the work. Howeve...

    Read More

  • Essay On The Bolshevik Revolution In Animal Farm

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of Orwell's main reasons for writing Animal Farm was to show how the Russian (or Bolshevik Revolutionaries) Revolution of 1917 had resulted in turning a benevolent ideal of equality into a government of an even more oppressive, totalitarian, and dominating to the people, than the aristocratic one it had recently ousted. Many of the main characters (animals) and synapses of Orwell's parody, run parallel to the event of the Bolshevik Revolution: In Orwell’s novel, The Farm is a representation of Russia and its people, and the most important characters such as Old Major, Snowball, and Napoleon parody the central figures that shaped it into the nation it came to be.

    Read More

  • The Nature of Communism and Nazism

    854 Words  | 2 Pages

    Two totalitarian systems, Communism and Nazism were the two most frightening totalitarian political systems in the history of mankind. They were the systems most brutal to its political adversaries but also to its own people and other races and/or religions. Unfortunately our own country, Croatia faced both of them during the 20th century, and some of bad influences we still feel today.In my essay I will do my best to examine these two totalitarian systems, describe their nature in essence and answer question "How did Communism and Nazism influence the societies".

    Read More

  • Small Country Farm at Bordighera

    464 Words  | 1 Pages

    In January 1884 Monet set out alone for the Mediterranean village of Bordighera, just across the Franco-Italian border. Originally intending to stay only for three weeks, Monet became so absorbed in the challenges of capturing brilliant hues of the lush landscape (so different from the cool, gray tonality of northern France) that he spent over two months there and produced forty paintings. Monet recorded his progress and frustrations in copious letters to friends back in Paris: "These palms are driving me crazy; the motifs are extremely difficult to seize, to put on canvas; it's so bushy everywhere, although delightful to the eye.... I would like to do orange and lemon trees silhouetted against the blue sea but cannot find them as I would like."

    Read More

  • The Iranian Revolution and the Russian Revolution

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cassier, M. (1999) The Shattered Horizon, How Ideology Mattered to Soviet Politics. Studies in European Thought, 51(1). 35-59.

    Read More

  • Agricultural Revolution In The Industrial Revolution

    779 Words  | 2 Pages

    Agriculture was the prevailing economic activity in England and Europe through the early modern era. The agricultural revolution laid a fundamental base for the industrial revolution. If agricultural productivity in England grew between the middle ages and the nineteenth century, then most of it occurred before the mid-eighteenth century. It all started with the “Bing-Bang”, the Black Death of 1348. Followed by new crops and techniques, increases in output and land improvement but also urban growth, agriculture became much more productive. Institutions such as enclosures and large farms are said to have increased productivity by encouraging farmers to adopt those new crops and techniques. However, there is little direct evidence for the actual impact of changes in land tenure on agricultural productivity. Indeed, the consequences of the enclosure movement on agricultural productivity has been a deeply debated topic in English economic history.

    Read More

  • Freedom For The Farmer Summary

    435 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Freedom for The Farmer” is can be outlined by two major points for this chapter. “No power over agriculture was given to any branch of the national government”. While this is said and done that, of course, didn’t stop Congress and federal agencies from looking around the Constitution. Which to when The Supreme Court struck down the phrase “general welfare”. To still basically gave Congress no power to control anything. But still doesn’t stop Congress from putting their hand where it doesn’t belong. It’s clearly stated that none of the branches of government have power in agriculture. Like always they believe that they do so and try to come up with numerous about of excuse to justify that they do in fact have a place.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Russian Revolution And Animal Farm

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    The allure of power and the difficulty of resisting said temptation has long been an issue for several rulers. In the metaphorical comparison of the Russian Revolution and Animal Farm by George Orwell, both face the temptation of power and ultimately fall to is corruption. Stalin and his animal representation, Napoleon, are proof that the quote “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” by Lord Acton rings true.

    Read More

  • Essay On Nazi Germany A Totalitarian State

    2864 Words  | 6 Pages

    MODERN HISTORY – RESEARCH ESSAY “To what extent was Nazi Germany a Totalitarian state in the period from 1934 to 1939?” The extent to which Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state can be classed as a substantial amount. With Hitler as Fuhrer and his ministers in control of most aspects of German social, political, legal, economical, and cultural life during the years 1934 to 1939, they mastered complete control and dictation upon Germany. In modern history, there have been some governments, which have successfully, and others unsuccessfully carried out a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is one in which a single ideology is existent and addresses all aspects of life and outlines means to attain the final goal, government is run by a single mass party through which the people are mobilized to muster energy and support.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Marxism

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socialism belongs to a family of ideologies, and springs from a common impulse. It envisions a society in which everyone contributes their time, labor, and talent to a common pool, and in return receives enough goods to satisfy their needs. It condemns the exploitation of one individual or class by another that occurs, so for example “when one profits from another’s labor.” Socialism also believes that property should be to benefit the public at large, not the wealthy. Socialists tend to favor peaceful and piecemeal reforms as a way of bringing about a socialist society, in which they envision a society whose major means of production are mines, mills, factories, power plants, etc. which are either publically owned or operated to benefit the public (187). Karl Marx’s envision for socialist transformation was, “a society that is changed not through moral suasion, but by understanding the hidden structures and process of material production.” The key to this was the “materialist conception of history” this made the primary determinants of social stability and change, material production and class struggle.

    Read More

More about The Collective Farms of Eastern Europe

Open Document